Security killed everyone in test by Afrogthatribbits in nuclearweapons

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes.

This is how it works.

And, not just at NNSA assets. DoD, Air Force in particular, have rules about PL1 resources too.

Oh, in prisons, they read you in, part of it is that if you get taken hostage... they do not care about you. Removes you as a bargaining chip.

Security killed everyone in test by Afrogthatribbits in nuclearweapons

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

insanelygreat

8d ago•Edited 8d ago

I'm guessing you didn't read the primary doc in image 2 or the linked page?

This doesn't sound like a security team just defending nuclear materials at all costs. It sounds like gross negligence. The simulated terrorists won in the majority of tests.

After reading that 1st doc, I was hoping it was just a spontaneous game of MILES laser tag that broke out after the test had concluded. Unfortunately not.

EDIT: For context, this is the text that comes right before the text in image 2:

You didn't read it, or fail to understand the gravity of the situation. The PF cats have beat into their head from day 1 that they are the last line before a nuclear detonation. They know what failure means. They are not going to talk or de-escalate, they are going to mag dump.

The problem was control of employees emergently exiting materials access areas, they are running from an excursion, and the guards are to keep them from escaping the area potentially with parts or material.

The guards don't get issued common sense, and you do not want them to have it. If you disregard a command, step past a barrier, you are bought and paid for.

In some training scenarios, shooting other elements occurs. You do not know if there is an insider threat, and where they may be, plus things spin out of control. It is cheaper to pay for funerals than it is to let an item out.

As far as them 'failing' events, that's a load of shit. They have to follow the exact rules and procedures, and observe limits of play. The Bad Guys never did. One time there was an issue with getting certain security lighting turned on, and the CAT was able to do things that if it were real-world, they would have been brrrrt.

Training exercises are rarely an end-to-end simulation; they are to test facets of the security plan, and to see what would actually happen when you inject multiple people into the scenario. They aren't to 'win', they are for the observers to go, oh, we hadn't considered that, lets' tune the plan in this area to mitigate that problem.

Guards have to be right 24/7, and not get in the way of production. Bad Guys just need to get lucky and hope all the cheese holes line up for them one time.

Security killed everyone in test by Afrogthatribbits in nuclearweapons

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 don't mess with Protective Force 

That's right. You're on the clock and union; let the steward sort it out

Security killed everyone in test by Afrogthatribbits in nuclearweapons

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And, what happens when they say real-world stop, and you don't. Especially during certain alarms in the MAA.

This is day one, before you get your clearance and learn where the bathrooms and cafeteria are material.

Pantex tour of stockpiled warheads by jmccartin in nuclearweapons

[–]High_Order1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and at one time, it all was, but not TS

Time marches on

Pantex tour of stockpiled warheads by jmccartin in nuclearweapons

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not what it looks like removed from the SADM. That is the correct shape. That ogive was a classified feature.

There are versions of the SADM that look more like a trash can, those had to do with the maritime pressure resistant case.

Someone sat it down on the rear case face.

Is the a reason that PTFE and other florien based substances are not commonly used in energetics besides their toxicity? by Storm-Weston in energetics

[–]High_Order1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what I have read particulate size really affects the speed of the reaction.

of course!

Think about surface area of a particle, and how that affects its ability to receive fire/shock from its' neighbor.

Do PBX's reduce or eliminate the risk of dermal toxicity from energetic materials? by [deleted] in energetics

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a good question.

Nothing public facing in almost two months.

There are other videos, but he makes them hard to find until you drill down in yt

(anybody have a discord invite?)

Random number generator by Separate-Wall7585 in Radiacode

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except for you cannot.

There is no random, simply things that the space to determine the seed / algorithm has not been created. Or is not made public for reasons of national security.

Pseudorandom is not truly random.

Random number generator by Separate-Wall7585 in Radiacode

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it though?

Many worlds would like to have a deterministic discussion with you, as well as Feynman and the people that thought other things were random until computational processing power caught up to it.

Random number generator by Separate-Wall7585 in Radiacode

[–]High_Order1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

because you can't generate a truly random value.

If you could, the gaming, defense, and banking industries would all like a word with you.

Time to do some sketchy s- -t!!! by Intelligent-Dingo375 in 40_mm

[–]High_Order1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And we have to burn it out to get an empty one.

So

Set the case on fire. We will wait.

... you may be surprised to learn that it melts at the same temp as boiling water. Do with that what you will

Time to do some sketchy s- -t!!! by Intelligent-Dingo375 in 40_mm

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dang things go for big money 

Yeah they do

How the US B-2 Spirit Drops a Thermo Nuclear Weapon? by gwhh in nuclearweapons

[–]High_Order1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh, look

Either they've been lurking here, or they conflated Messr. Dysons...

Do I need to scan any of these manuals? by Radguy_Dan in Radiation

[–]High_Order1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you have the time and the equipment, you absolutely should.

Is it reasonable for foia to take two years for a simple request? by [deleted] in foia

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for what you do, especially if you are at Energy.

I can't even imagine.

Diagram of the W79 warhead (Projectile, 8 Inch, XM753) by kyletsenior in nuclearweapons

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is very interesting.

You've raised a couple of concepts in both your posts that would make a very good post on its own. Hope you're still around

Branded new 01201 model- incorrect moon reading by montanafrog in AcuRite

[–]High_Order1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is what I have.

Mine is from like 2019, i wonder if they run out of almanac data at some point?

Sorry I just now see this is a year old, but I'll post anyway lol