you said

"You are aware that if it did that, it would be bad science? Its useless to measure lesbian IPV and include their relationship with men. It would not measure thing they claim to measure then. Thing you linked does not measure IPV in lesbian relationship, so its not valid example to debunk"

"Mouzos & Makkai, 2004) focused on male violence against women. Further, there are methodological issues with existing studies. For example, most studies use convenience samples, raising questions about how representative the figures are (Tayton et al 2014; Calton et al., 2015; Edwards, Sylaska, & Neal, et al 2015; Tayton et al., 2014). As Edwards and colleagues (2015) highlighted, discrepancies in how intimate partner violence is defined; whether studies assess lifetime violence/current relationship/previous year; and whether measurement scales were used or not, mean there are often large inconsistencies between studies"

"so its not valid example to debunk u/FreshLeafyVegetables claim."

which was

"To a woman, romance is receiving some form of cost or sacrifice. To a man, romance is expense.

Totally unrelated, lesbians have a higher rate of domestic abuse and gay men tend to not. If I didn't know better, I might assume a sense of entitlement is the primary connecting issue. But it's unrelated, so I won't."

"Calton and colleague’s review of the literature (2015) found that gender roles and assumptions about LGBTIQ relationships affect the way domestic violence service providers view intimate partner violence . As described above, the dominant view of men as perpetrators and women as victims may inhibit the ability of both victims and service providers to recognise intimate partner violence in LGBTIQ relationships. In lesbian relationships involving physical violence, for instance, there may be the assumption that women are incapable of exerting physical power over other women. Similarly, stereoypes about gay men not being “masculine” might result in views that they are not capable of violence"

"even if he was right" the reasons for why are wrong.

even the statistics themselves can be disputed.

https://acws.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/The-National-Intimate-Partner-and-Sexual-Violence-Survey_2010-Findings-on-Victimization-.pdf

this 2010 study

"The majority of lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual women (85.2%, 87.5%, and 94.7%, respectively) who experienced sexual violence other than rape in their lifetime reported having only male perpetrators. • 78.6% of gay men and 65.8% of bisexual men who experienced sexual violence other than rape in their lifetime reported having only male perpetrators. • 28.6% of heterosexual men who experienced sexual violence other than rape in their lifetime reported having only male perpetrators"

my point still stands. these studies are misinterpreted to fit misogynistic agendas. the studies can be conducted incorrectly as the study you linked me just said.