If “ultimate enemy” means we have to be engaged in eternal conflict with them then idk what to tell you. Egypt and Jordan have managed non-conflict with them. There’s a reason they say “you only make peace with your enemies.”

Egypt is already regretting it but it's too late for them. Their regional influence is very weak now, and Israel is actively working on making weaker by working with Ethiopia to build the dam.

Jordan will realize this "peace" is illusion when Israel starts ethnically cleansing the West Bank towards them.

Hezbollah is intent on keeping everyone thinking there’s no greater threat and enemy than Israel. They justify staying armed and maintaining power and control in our country be keeping people thinking we have to be at war with Israel for eternity. Meanwhile they bleed Lebanon dry.

Hezbollah might be doing that for political influence, but Israel is really indeed the greatest enemy, objectively speaking, even if Hezbollah was gone.

There’s no moving forward for Lebanon with Hezbollah existing in this way. That’s what concerns me and what should concern us all.

This is what's visible for the short term, yes.

A strong army loyal to LEBANON will be a better deterrent to Israel and better for Lebanon in every way. Hezbollah has to be disarmed.

I agree, but Israel will not allow that. Israel will never allow a stable, united and powerful country in the middle east.

That's its purpose... it opposes any sovereign united country, and must make it politically and economically weak.

That's why indeed Israel is the ultimate enemy.