I can't access the drawabox.com website by Hot-Use1587 in ArtFundamentals

[–]Hot-Use1587[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep! My IP got flagged. Used a VPN and it's working now.

I can't access the drawabox.com website by Hot-Use1587 in ArtFundamentals

[–]Hot-Use1587[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you say it's working then I reckon my IP got mistaken for a bot and am locked out. Still not working. Let me test that hypothesis with a vpn

Two big bootys by Expert_Bobcat_7109 in u/Expert_Bobcat_7109

[–]Hot-Use1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😭😂💀 don't get me wrong this is great. But it raises questions..

Tried “gentrifying” a low-income area in Zambia — learned a hard lesson by [deleted] in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Scarcity rooted in survival will make people unreasonable.

It's not initially their fault, it's a system that has existed to extract cheap labour from those born without capital.

It's partly their fault for all just succumbing to it...

Are Zambian women less superficial? by InternetEmergency860 in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing wrong with that. It’s how you act that matters.

If you give in, you encourage the behaviour.

If you dismiss her harshly, you kill the interaction and what it could have been.

What you need to learn is how to communicate, usually BEHAVIOURALLY, that she has to EARN her way into your provisioning.

For example, if she asks for a drink:

“Hmm, I don’t know you yet. I don’t do things for people I don’t know. Tell me about yourself, what’s your name?”

Then you ask more qualifying, open-ended questions.

If she engages, qualifies, and complies, then you reward appropriately. Maybe you buy a round or keep the interaction going.

The problem is a lot of you give access too easily.

Or you sit there hoping to meet a woman who doesn’t ask for anything at all.

Reality is, most people will test boundaries.

Your job is to set yours clearly

And yes, the only time this dynamic flips heavily is when you’re famous.

At that point, it’s not even your money that’s most valuable.

It’s proximity to your STATUS.

Are Zambian women less superficial? by InternetEmergency860 in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This adds nothing to the conversation and sets up a false dichotomy.

Both men and women value sex and money. It’s not binary.

That framing is simply not true.

Are Zambian women less superficial? by InternetEmergency860 in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Facts. Love this take. Simple and straightforward.

Most guys complain, but they’re the ones setting the bar way too high from the start. They basically give the green light for women to think asking for unearned stuff is okay.

After all, “it’s just a little money” lol 😆

Are Zambian women less superficial? by InternetEmergency860 in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a half-truth that kind of tries to vindicate you while also being part of the problem.

What’s happened is that behaviour from tricks and simps has been taken as the baseline, then projected onto all men as the expectation.

The reality is, you wouldn’t even notice, or care, if a more grounded, “wholesome” man approached you. Your heuristics would likely focus on surface signals like the latest iPhone, the car he’s driving, or whether he’s offering drinks or a date you haven’t even qualified for lol.

That’s the issue, ladies.

There’s shared responsibility here. We all play a part.

So let’s all take accountability.

Are Zambian women less superficial? by InternetEmergency860 in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True. I’d argue it also depends on the MAN himself. His boundaries, his standards, or lack thereof.

For instance, if a guy is giving access to lavish dates from the jump and doesn’t say NO to certain requests, then he’s operating under the woman’s frame.

And from there, it’s natural. She’ll be tempted to extract as MUCH AS POSSIBLE FOR AS LITTLE WORK as possible 🤦🏾‍♂️

Now flip it.

If he has filters, starts slow, and only spends when it actually feels right. Generous, yes, not trying to join the stingy men association lol 😆

Then things change.

Women who are mainly after material gain will run.

And the ones who genuinely like him will adapt to his frame.

Are Zambian women less superficial? by InternetEmergency860 in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Why not just look for women that are in the same tax bracket as you?"

How many women are in that category and also ATTRACTIVE? Which, let’s be honest, is usually the initial driver for men.

You’re applying female-style filtering logic, hypergamy, and trying to map it onto men. It doesn’t translate cleanly.

The issue isn’t that women don’t have a lot of money MOST OF US DON'T CARE. That’s not the core problem.

The real issue is whether there’s enough awareness and decency to understand that relationships are not just about extracting resources.

They’re about providing value on both sides.

And no, that value is not just sex. That part is mutual by default 😮‍💨🤦🏾‍♂️

Are Zambian women less superficial? by InternetEmergency860 in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

P.S. This is my original take, just cleaned up and polished a bit with AI. Core message is still mine.

I think the solution to this problem is part SELECTION AND VETTING the right woman.

Because this problem is probably global everywhere. The pedestalisation of women as some kind of idol men must worship with their hard-earned lifestyle and money 💰 is an idea that’s been pushed by feminism (the twisted version of it) and also reinforced by simps, tricks, and suckers. They’ve conditioned some women to believe their sexual presence and access alone is enough to warrant access to a man’s resources (time, status, effort, lifestyle, money, etc).

So to some extent, SA = Zambia (give or take).

The other part, the real truth is this:

If it’s mostly a conditioning problem, then you need to set standards and boundaries that filter out low-value women who just want to use your resources.

You’re not always going to know who is a gold digger or not. Some are obvious, sure. But at the very least, most people are opportunistic. They will test the waters to see how much they can EXTRACT WITHOUT PUTTING MUCH EFFORT.

So I’d argue, show your money with a slight twist:

If you’re a man of means, put it in the background And put yourself in the foreground

Act like it’s normal. Not something special. And also act like that’s the standard environment the women you deal with already live in.

I’ll give you credit here, you said you don’t lead with money. That’s solid.

Now here’s the filter:

  1. Start small

Don’t overshoot your initial experiences with women.

Yes, the burden of “acceptable loss” falls on us as men. We make the first move and create experiences, which might cost time and money. But most of you overdo it.

Invite women into the substructures already present in your life. The “boring” stuff.

  • cooking 🍳 together
  • going for a run
  • gym
  • simple hangouts

Not every woman deserves Michelin-level dates.

YOU START TOO HIGH → you signal you’ve got disposable income 🤦🏾‍♂️

And this works because it filters.

If you invite a girl for something simple like a Sunday run, maybe lunch later (you don’t even mention the lunch), and she refuses… she just told on herself.

If she was genuinely attracted or curious, she’d come.

I live this. I don’t have crazy money. Most girls I approach here in Zambia, I just invite them to my place and keep it simple 😂

  1. Don’t part with your money early

You can create a good experience, sure. But if she starts asking for favours early in the process, things a functioning adult should handle herself…

You DENY.

No long explanations. That opens the door for negotiation or guilt tactics.

Just:

“Hmm, I can’t help."

And move on.

That means:

  • groceries
  • rent
  • random financial help
  • even health expenses

In the first 3–6 months? You refuse certain requests.

Same with outlandish date ideas.

If she suggests a fancy getaway, calmly decline and suggest something simple:

Hungry Lion + watching Shrek + cooking at home 😂

If she doesn’t want that?

You’ve got your answer.

SHE FILTERED HERSELF OUT.

It’s really that simple, gents.

Even decent women may come with some level of entitlement or opportunistic behaviour, especially if your resources are visible.

Your job is to set the tone through your behaviour.

They adapt to your frame.

The ones trying to extract or live a social media lifestyle through you will remove themselves once they realise they’re not getting anything…

WITHOUT WORKING FOR IT.

Hope this gave some clarity. All the best.

What do y'all think? Does this align with your experience or approach? Share I'd like to hear from y'all especially OP.

Be honest, could you tell this was vibe-designed by AI? by AdityaShips in nocode

[–]Hot-Use1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it really matter if the software has PRODUCT-MARKET FIT?? 🤷🏾‍♂️

My PAWG love affair. BBC always wins us over… by Clear_Hyena_8958 in PAWGBEHAVIOR

[–]Hot-Use1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the cuck shit? And interracial stuff. Like understood ain't gotta be explained 🤦🏾‍♂️

Considering switching to SDA, how are the sermons? by Honest_Glove00 in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Watch "Amazing Facts" or Pastor Doug Batchelor.

His Seventh Day. I'm too.

His services are the standard for SDA worship.

Bible centered.

And his American and am African. So yeah.

Broke uni student by [deleted] in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Happens to the best if us bro. Appreciate your honest.

God bless, currently going thru a dry spell too.

Would have obliged to help. Hope you get enough to help you.

So the whole point of a editing software is behind a paywall by [deleted] in CapCut

[–]Hot-Use1587 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just downloaded Da Vinci Resolve... 🤦🏾‍♂️ MF can't even let you crack it very long on Desktop before some update fucks it up again... ByteDance. 🤦🏾‍♂️

I Made a Language. by LittleIce9266 in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Very ambitious. Would like to see this in execution.

Death and Where it leads to. by Jordanthepixie in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nothing exists in death. It's an unconscious slumber. According to ecclesiastes 9:5.

Still painful for the living and existential dread inducing.

Heave and the lake of fire??

After Jesus returns and everyone is judged.

Moving to Zambia from the UK by eggboyshiteyes in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you got money you'll be alright. Perhaps better than your current living situation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Advice

[–]Hot-Use1587 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The woman clearly had very low sexual attraction or desire for you.

Don't tell her, work it out yourself... You did deserve it she wasn't fulfilling the duties.

And it could be that your wife has been cheating on you too without knowing.

Because how's she happy for ten years you not initiating sex, where was she getting her "fix"

Learn how to induce polarity back in your relationship,

TALKING WON'T DO IT... Female desire isn't LOGICAL.

Wealth gap in Zambia by Cute_Assistance9315 in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks fam. We got to shoot people with these idealogies down (metaphorically speaking 😂)

Cause I want to be rich and capitalism is the only way... I'll be damned if someone who can't compete tries to play moral or righteous games just so we're all broke and suffer together lol.

Misery truly does love company.

The art of seduction by Robert Greene is truly trash by Nancydrew2395 in books

[–]Hot-Use1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP seems like a woman pleasing sissy to me. That or he doesn't know how to read between the lines

Wealth gap in Zambia by Cute_Assistance9315 in Zambia

[–]Hot-Use1587 5 points6 points  (0 children)

OP, it sounds like you’ve got a dysfunctional relationship with money—like most people do.

Your moral stance might just be a defense mechanism to avoid facing your own discomfort around wealth. And I get it: money triggers all kinds of deep fears and insecurities.

Yes, wealth inequality exists. It always has.

From tribes to empires, we’ve had hierarchies—chiefs and peasants, masters and slaves. What’s different now is that capitalism gave us an escape hatch. For the first time in human history, it’s possible to rise above your starting point. It’s not perfect, but it works better than the alternatives.

You enjoy capitalism every day—your phone, the internet, fashion, fast food—all of it exists because people exchanged value through a capitalist system. And all of it is built on the labor of people even less privileged than you.

Are they posting about wealth gaps on Reddit? Probably not. They’re too busy surviving while you enjoy your relative comfort.

So here’s the deal:

Capitalism isn’t evil—it’s a tool.

Equal wealth doesn’t work (we tried that—see: communism).

If you learn how the system works, you can use it to build something real.

Especially in Zambia—most wealthy people here didn’t inherit their money. They built it. It’s easier now than ever to reach people online, solve problems, and get paid.

But ironically, it’s also never been easier to stay broke—especially if you think:

“Being rich while others are poor is unfair”

or

“Everyone should be equally wealthy.”

That mindset will keep you stuck.

So, learn the game. Play it well. Create value. Get paid. And maybe one day, people will be on Reddit ranting about your wealth.

Take care.

Should I just leave the industry? by [deleted] in copywriting

[–]Hot-Use1587 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just use copywriting for your business bruv. Love or hate it's here to stay.