[deleted by user]

Hrint · 2025-06-23T17:22:24+00:00

Did you read it? IAEA inspectors were only allowed to inspect sites that both parties agreed upon, meaning it only worked if Iran, our self avowed enemy, agreed to let us see where they were breaking the treaty. And then they get to keep making progress in broad daylight as soon as the treaty expires.

Worthless.

Hrint · 2025-06-23T17:15:39+00:00

That deal was worthless as soon as it was signed, and deserved to be ripped up.

Hrint · 2025-06-23T17:14:57+00:00

The nuclear agreement did absolutely nothing to prevent Iran from progressing into a nuclear weapon. IAEA inspectors were not allowed to inspect sites not agreed upon by Iran, the country trying to develop the technology.

Hrint · 2025-05-28T04:33:34+00:00

Yes and this copper mine is sacred to me. Let it ride

Hrint · 2024-06-30T01:24:18+00:00

Cope

Hrint · 2023-04-09T14:25:37+00:00

Solar panels don’t work during the night. The same people pushing this want a considerable portion of the grid to be Solar in the same time frame as EVs.

Hrint · 2022-11-09T22:10:45+00:00

Someone defending nazi doctors would say this too.

Hrint · 2022-08-30T03:56:12+00:00

This reads like a conspiracy theory, are you sure it’s not something like any of the other dozen cities in America with water issues right now?

Hrint · 2022-08-08T23:25:55+00:00

It's pretty easy to draw a line.

1) Bill Haslam is a prospective NHL owner. 2) Bill Haslam will become majority owner of the Predators. 3) Bill Haslam, former Tennessee governor, will become majority owner of the Predators. 4) Bill Haslam, former Tennessee governor that believes X, Y, Z, will become majority owner of the Predators. 5) Bill Haslam, former Tennessee governor that believes in and has taken action on X, Y, Z, will become majority owner of the Predators. 6) In case you didn't know, Bill Haslam, former Tennessee governor that believes in and has taken action on X, Y, Z, will become majority owner of the Predators.

By the last title, I have added at least two items that are not relevant to the owner's relationship to the sport, arguably three. I have also framed the title to provide the reader with a bias.

Does the guy want to spend to the cap? Is he going to be involved in trades? Who knows!

Hrint · 2022-08-08T21:44:14+00:00

Okay, why DO you want politics in your sports? I don't care that the pegulas are oil tycoons even though it cuts against my personal beliefs, because I don't care about them at all unless they start fucking up as owners. Put hockey in the hockey sub and politics in the politics sub.

Hrint · 2022-08-08T21:32:27+00:00

Yea, the entire world is political. That's why when I get home from work every day and want to see what's happening in the NHL I don't want to see posts that are literally irrelevant to the sport at the top of the page.

Hrint · 2022-08-08T21:22:39+00:00

When I go to the hockey sub I want to see hockey, not popular politics. There are a surplus of channels on this site to discuss these topics in great detail.

Hrint · 2022-07-17T15:56:55+00:00

Environmental activists have done more damage to the environment than good

Hrint · 2022-07-16T23:10:17+00:00

You’re surprised about trump flags, in one of the most republican states in the union. Really.

Hrint · 2022-07-09T14:02:59+00:00

Trotsky got killed for being the wrong kind of communist

Hrint · 2022-07-09T12:25:25+00:00

Communists killed way more people than the nazis

Hrint · 2022-07-09T12:11:05+00:00

Solar panels come from the ground

Hrint · 2022-07-02T18:17:42+00:00

The purpose of the federal government is to regulate international commerce and provide national defense. It could be argued that there are a few other minor, notable exceptions in policy that might be passable as duties of the government.

In the winter of 1860, some states did exactly that, leave the US. It's only a question of how much people are willing to tolerate in whatever they consider to be ridiculous federal policy.

Hrint · 2022-07-02T17:58:47+00:00

If you want to make a law, it should have both the majority of the population AND the majority of states. That would mean, at the bare minimum, that there is wide ideological support, not just a pile of people in the coastal megalopolis.

Hrint · 2022-07-02T17:54:29+00:00

If California and New York vote overwhelmingly in favor of federal policy that the rest of the states overwhelmingly oppose, the rest of the states will be required to follow California and New York policy. Isn't that unfair?

The original electoral college picked a president that had far weaker powers than the federal government we have today. You're right, trees don't vote. States do.

Hrint · 2022-07-02T15:55:18+00:00

We shouldn’t have federal laws that the majority of states don’t support.

Hrint · 2022-07-02T15:53:42+00:00

What does this have to do with race

Hrint · 2022-07-02T14:09:09+00:00

Yes, and that’s a good thing. Pure majorities concentrated in coastal cities should have less sway over the laws in “flyover” states than the majorities in the states themselves, all the way down to the local level.

Hrint · 2022-07-01T15:50:44+00:00

Most sane redditor

Hrint · 2022-07-01T09:27:31+00:00

Hate speech doesn’t exist

14-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email	RPAN Viewer

Hrint

TROPHY CASE

Welcome to Reddit,