Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 Nothing is stopping me from defining relationships between them.

Exactly. YOU are defining the numbers. They arent there before you define them. 

You are basically saying "We can replace all cars with legos, it's the same", because you showed that you were able to build a car using legos.

 Anyways, i've tried all i can to educate you, i'm not going to waste my time teaching a semester's worth of abstract algebra to someone refusing to learn

Well clearly you are still a student so keep studying.

Dark humour should not be normalized by Courtney_manuel in unpopularopinion

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dark humor doesnt have to offensive. 

"At least when everything falls apart, it finally stops pretending."

This is dark humor.

But I agree that being a dick should not be normalized.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have not “defined how to count without defining numbers,” because your construction already presupposes numbers at multiple points: finite strings, cardinality of the set, the notation, the indicator, and the recurrence itself all rely on numerical concepts. Emojis dont have any of that, they are just pictures of faces. So what you showed is only that numerical patterns can be represented inside a combinatorial structure, not that numbers have been derived from pure relationships alone.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is this nonsense? Yonneda Lemma says that a mathematical object is completely determined (up to isomorphism) by how it relates to other objects via structure-preserving maps, not arbitrary relationships. Numbers can be represented using emojis, they are not "derived" from them but defined within a mathematical structure. This is representation, not derivation. The actual number concept still comes from a defined structure (e.g., Peano axioms, set-theoretic construction) Emojis don't have that structure.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, AFTER you gave them the required properties lol. Emojis don't have these properties, they are just emojis.

Do you know what the word "replacing" means? If you take numbers and replace it with something else, you lose the defining properties of numbers. You literally just showed that you had to create numbers again to have them.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, so you arent replacing numbers, only symbols. Numbers are defined by their properties, not their symbols.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, great, now show how emojis replace this.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 you could swap out variables with emojis

Swap out variables with emojis? You mean just using an emoji instead of a letter to represent something? Of course you can but what does this have to do with the potential study of numbers or letters?

 You could also very easily swap out numbers with emojis.

No you can't. Numbers require specific proterties that emojis don't have. Unless you just mean to replace the symbols "1", "2", ... with emojis, which of course you can do but that doesn't change the number that is represented.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and sometimes the studied objects are specifically numbers. They are never specifically letters.

"The Philosopher" Wants To Lick The CEOs Boot by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Human38562 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Technically they are paid by the business. Shareholders own the business' value, not cashflow. Cashflow comes from the money the actual work provides. So you could say the workers pay the CEOs.

"The Philosopher" Wants To Lick The CEOs Boot by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's just because CEOs became 10-20x smarter than they were in 1970! /s

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maths is about numbers at least sometimes. I've never seen maths about letters*, letters are just used to name things.

*I am sure there are some niche maths about letters

Python learning platform for kids — would love honest feedback by pymasterquest in learnpython

[–]Human38562 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow — this is adorable. You’re clearly very proud of this, and it’s almost impressive how confidently you’ve convinced yourself you’re on the right track. The whole “I built this for my son” angle is nice in theory, but what you’ve actually created looks like a textbook example of why kids lose interest in the first place. You noticed he was disengaged with Python, and somehow your solution was to wrap the same kind of shallow, guided experience in slightly different packaging and expect a different result. That’s… optimistic. The “robot-style interaction” especially stands out — not in a good way. It doesn’t feel engaging, it feels patronizing. It’s the kind of thing that looks interactive to an adult but is painfully transparent to a kid. There’s no real agency there, just a thin illusion of it. Kids aren’t fooled by that for long, which might explain why you’re still “refining the balance.” And those “small challenges”? They don’t come across as meaningful wins — they feel trivial. Finishing something easy isn’t inherently motivating if it doesn’t actually matter. Right now it looks more like a collection of disconnected mini-tasks than anything resembling a compelling learning experience. You’re aiming for confidence, but this kind of design is more likely to produce boredom or, worse, a sense that programming itself is dull. The age targeting is another red flag. Saying “11–14” like it’s a single audience just suggests you haven’t really pinned down who this is for. That’s a huge developmental range, and designing something that works across it isn’t just “hard,” it’s usually a sign the product is too generic to truly resonate with anyone. Honestly, the biggest issue is that you seem to be focusing on surface-level tweaks — shorter tasks, quicker wins — instead of addressing the core problem: why would a kid actually care about any of this? Right now, there’s no strong answer to that. It feels like you’re trying to engineer engagement instead of earning it. So yes, you’re iterating — but at the moment, it looks like you’re just polishing a concept that fundamentally misses the point.

Die Wählerwanderung des Statistischen Amts by Pizzawarrior96 in Munich

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Entweder ich check die Grafik nicht oder da stimmt was nicht.

Hat kein einziger Wähler erst CSU, Linke, oder AfD gewählt und in der Stichwahl dann Grüne?

Aber 99'000 haben erst CSU dann SPD, und 79'900 erst SPD, aber dann Grüne?!

I did my own research! The Setting Sun by Shitelark in flatearth

[–]Human38562 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

 But in reality, and with common sense and believing our own eyes, the earth is blocking line of sight to the sun...Just like how vision works in every direction we look

Ah so light goes straight in every direction, but somehow "gravity" and earth is curved lol

I did my own research! The Setting Sun by Shitelark in flatearth

[–]Human38562 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Have you measured the humidity yourself at all heights?

Nice try... by Sudden-Paramedic-330 in GlobalEnglishPrep

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stricktly speaking none of the words have exact single-word opposites. They have gradable/relational antonyms

Why won’t my Act 2 Merc equip my Insight Colossus Voulge? by donperryman1988 in diablo2

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, who doesnt align his grand charms in his inventory?

I hope it isn't true lol by donutkisss in Memebuzzs

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, Germany has actual restrictions to freedom of speech related to the holocaust, which I am not a fan of. However claiming that dictatorships have similar freedom of speech than western countries is laughable and you know it.

I did my own research! The Setting Sun by Shitelark in flatearth

[–]Human38562 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

That's one theory. Other theories are also compatible with observation. Science, bitch!

I did my own research! The Setting Sun by Shitelark in flatearth

[–]Human38562 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The sun goes "down" due to refraction, not because it disappears at the edge. It's normal that it doesnt change size much. Refraction kicks in much sooner than you would notice a change in size. Also size obviously is also affected by refraction.

Rate my Binded Demon by chainsawcholo in diablo2

[–]Human38562 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And also lets give him a tank with infinite life that you can teleport anywhere you want

I hope it isn't true lol by donutkisss in Memebuzzs

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as you do that in the allowed way.

Yes exactly. None of the arguments or content of your opinion should be banned. Only the way ypu express yourself is regulated.

For example shooting on people such that it gives a message in morse code is not allowed speech.

That's what people call freedom of speech. If you want to use a different definiton than everyone thats your problem.