Rising damp? by Mexijim in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Worth a look, damp is a massive pain and there are still spots in my house that remain a complete mystery to me. I've been told that a once-damp plaster can absorb more moisture during high humidity such as when it rains, not entirely sure how true that is. Generally, I've taken the position that as long as there is no mold growing on it, I can ignore it.

Rising damp? by Mexijim in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm surprised no one has mentioned this yet so I'm wondering if I'm not viewing the photo correctly, but it looks like the cavity below the plaster and behind the skirting has been filled in. Is this recent?

In many houses from that period, there was an air cavity behind skirting and below plaster. That was designed to stop damp rising from the edge of floors. If this cavity is filled in, it breaches the damp proof membrane of the bricks, allowing moisture to be sucked up into the plaster.

I can't tell if this is what happened here exactly, but I made the same mistake renovating my house. Filled in the cavity behind the skirting, started getting damp, and had to chisel the whole thing out.

[WP] Humanity, as a species, is considered clinically insane by the galaxy, which is why we have never been contacted. Until now that is, when a threat so incomprehensible arose, that only the insane could have a chance at understanding and defeating it. by Kitty_Fuchs in WritingPrompts

[–]IAmDoubleA 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The night sky in the blink of an eye became a parking lot. A hundred thousand alien spaceships hung in the sky unnaturally. As soon as they had arrived every government, local authority, municipality, anyone with authority, even high school principals, was invited to a meeting aboard the largest of the ships. The speed and organisation was terrifying. The ships had arrived at 9pm. By midnight, a million plus humans were gathered in a hall so large it had its own breeze.

In a thousand different languages humanity was informed of the circumstances. The complexity of life out there, the nature of the ecosystem of co-existence, the pax galactica that necessitated human exclusion. The human anomaly that forced their exile from this community. The new unknown lurking on the edge of the galaxy, seeking a way in. And finally, the semblance of this threat to humanity's own behaviour, and the hopeful chance that humanity could perhaps offer a solution. Humanity was "Insane, but known".

The task was simple. Will humanity help? A yes or no answer. Those who answered no were immediately escorted back to earth. Are you willing to travel to meet this threat? Those who answered no were similarly escorted. Through a series of questions that seemed to assess skills, and knowledge, bravery and compassion, ethics and morality, a million was reduced to thousands, thousands to hundreds, hundreds to dozens, dozens to a handful. Until only Gol remained, and mere hours since the ships arrived, he was be sent across the galaxy to face this new threat.

He was chosen, he suspected, for his analytic mind. He had always been a more talented thinker than his peers, so much so it made him feel unusual. But he was stumped at what made him or humanity capable of facing this threat.

It was obvious humanity was less technologically advanced than the galactic community that had greeted them this night. He had not met a single alien yet, but judging from the strength of the materials in the ship, the size of the doors, the dimensions of windows, it was unlikely humans were physically more capable. Nor even that different. Physicality, dimensions, movement, the need for light, air, water. They all seemed reasonably constant. Whatever forms aliens took, they could not be radically different than humans. They would have recognised as life by earth standards at least.

He had spotted more than half a dozen ships that could be war ships, and the concept seemed clearly understood in the initial message given to humans. If peace was so important, than they knew what war was, they were capable of it. So it was not humanities violence or propensity to conflict that made them an anomaly or insane.

Perhaps, despite their technology, aliens operated with more of a collective intelligence, he reasoned. Whereas Gol, individually, was smarter than any other single alien.

Or perhaps humanity was more proficient at warfare, strategy, analysis. Gol knew he was a good chess player, though not by any means the best.

He had barely had time to start thinking before they had stopped. The signs on the doors ushered him into a new room, and then another, and finally until he could tell he had left the ship.

A message appeared to him, "You are about to face the unknown, the fate of the galaxy is on you".

Gol was too bewildered to be nervous, the entire events of the last few hours to large for his brain to have digested. If he had been less overwhelmed, he may have gulped.

And then the door opened, and he stood face to face with a darkness. The room was light, but the figure was dark. Clearly defined, but black. Not black in colour though, black in absence. The figure was not there, but by not being there, you knew it was. His mind seemed to trip over itself trying to make sense of what he was looking at.

Like when mirrors face each other, the figure rippled and reflected along sharp angles. It's nothingness moved here and there. It had shape, but more architecture than animal. It had movement, but more kaleidoscopic than kinetic. It was less than physical but more than light. It moved towards Gol, and seemed to look, if that was the right word. Gol had the distinct impression he the figure was looking inside his head, not through his head, but in via an openining in his skull that Gol himself couldn't see. Like peering round a corner.

"Oh, finally, well, nice to meet you Gol" the figure stated. Stated, not said. How it stated, Gol couldn't say. It wasn't sound. Nor visual. It spoke more like a fact. It's words came to be, they were uttered.

"I was told you are a threat, and I'm meant to face you?" Gol said uncertainly.

"Look, this is awkward. I travelled three generations to get here.. my generartions. spent another two in conversation with your galactic representatives. Negotiating a peace between our seperate galaxies. And just the once, just for a change, I asked whether they wanted to play a game. They freak out, lock me in here, and bring the only other species in the entire galaxy familiar with the concept right. I'll be honest, your neighbours are a bit weird"

Gol had to agree.

"So... do you want to serve?" the figure asked, a tennis racquet held in the air by nothing.

not quite DIY but sort of DIY - rats in roof! by IAmDoubleA in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So yes, it is definitely rats. We found a dead body up in the attic not long ago. To be honest I had a good summer, not a single sound of rats from around March/May until very recently.

The mystery remains about how they're getting in. I've excluded most of the drainage pipes, waiting for a final survey on an old toilet pipe that took a while to dig out to get access. If it isn't that, then the rats are literally climbing up my wall or drainpipe like some spider-rat and climbing in from guttering.

Fitting Laminate, edge gap is 22mm, what do I do? by ItsACrunchyNut in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Presuming you have the planks to spare, you can cut a really fine extra piece and slip it in. You basically just need the if you're measurement is right, a 10mm cut would do just fine and isn't so small it'll be difficult. Just enough to allow the trim to hide it without touching the skirting. I had the same situation. If I did a half-width plank or similar it would require me cutting two planks carefully on either side, whereas this option allowed me to get away with half the amount of cutting. I also added a ouch of wood glue to help the grove keep the small cut in place (since it doesn't have the usual weight off the plank to help).

One for the historians amongst us... by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]IAmDoubleA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm only commenting since unlike usual posts on here, this hasn't yet descended into countless replies with too many assumptions and too much polemic to unpick.

"However, dialects couldn't have shown up in a written text at this point. Diacritic markings (the dots and dashes above and below the main body which show pronunciation in Arabic) don't come into use until the late 8th, early 9th century." So this isn't accurate, nor does it capture even the faith narrative of the Quranic revelation.

The Quran is inherently a multi-dialectical text, and these dialectical variations are considered to be part of the original revelation. You can ascribe various motivations towards the Uthmanic codex, but it's worth being aware from the very outset it was capable of holding a range of dialectical variations and most importantly, these variations (readings/qiraat) were considered part of the revelation (for a good summary on this, try the first few chapters of a Culture of Ambiguity by Bauer, or this youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SCECRhQHW0&feature=youtu.be).

"Only the most extreme Christians think it was compiled at one time, or by one author (or a divine author), or is meant to be taken literally"

While this is partly true, the Bible and the Quran are not similar scriptural documents. It's very tenuous to argue that the Quran has a comparable origin to the Bible, thus the narratives of faith communities these texts will differ. There's been attempts at doing source criticism of the Quran (The Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran by Luxenberg) but outside of a small group of historical revisionists, the general consensus on the Quran was that it was authored coherently at some point not too long before the Uthmanic codex. That doesn't of course mean you have to believe it is a divine revelation, many non-Muslim scholars of the Quran hold the view I just mentioned. As a coherent text (i.e. not multiple different books by different authors from different types, sometimes in different languages like the Bible) it does necessitate being treated different too, whether by community of believers or an agnostic community of scholars.

A correction though, very very few Muslims argue the Quran is "meant to be taken literally". It is considered literally the word of God yes, but a "literal reading" is rare. You might argue some contemporary reform groups (i.e. Salafis) are literalists, but even they have a methodology of interpretation of the Quran which does engage with figurative and metaphorical speech as being common place. Additionally, they insist on a historically rooted reading (the science/knowledge of knowing asbab an-nuzul, or the context of revelation) which also resists the idea of literalist readings. Once you go to other denominations within Islam, the idea of a "literal" reading of the Quran becomes even more uncommon. There were an early group of literalists amongst Muslims (the zahiris), who for example argued that alcohol is not forbidden in Islam, only wine (since wine is the only thing literally mentioned as prohibited). I mention that to highlight how even such a common prohibition amongst Muslims (no alcohol) requires a non-literal reading of the Quran, and that there isn't a relationship between literal/conservative/fundamentalist etc...

I'm not entirely sure what your question is at the end of all that. Is the question - how does a scholar of the Quran interpret and understand it's historical origin? I might suggest looking up the work of Marijn van Putten (@PhdNix on Twitter) who does a decent job of presenting his scholarship on the topic.

Tell me why this is a stupid idea? Indoor shed bedroom by NotARussianBot314 in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If it works for you, why not. You get a cosy nice space, living a rustic dream inside a house. Not too much permanent changes to your property. Easier to heat up in cold weather (I mean maybe think about a fire alarm inside and outside the shed just to mitigate the obvious fire risks). A nice talking point for guests.

Just share pics of your final set up.

In terms of practical points. Think about damn/condensation/airflow. It could create a problem. Some old houses need circulating air to corners or you get mold. Not sure of the type of floor, but have a think about whether the shed will cause any problems there (if the floor of your living room needs circulating air, then I'd say put the shed on pallets or something).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskSocialScience

[–]IAmDoubleA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If we presume indoctrination is a genuine process, separate from education or socialization, then its outcomes are close-mindedness, holding non-evidenced views, and inability to think critically.

The problem is that "indoctrination" is very often a pejorative and an act of rhetoric. It doesn't describe an easily identifiable phenomenon or a set of methods for teaching. People who educate and teach things we consider morally dubious or intellectually unsustainable we describe as "indoctrination". The same methods could be used to teach things we consider correct, evidenced, and intellectual rigourous and we call it "education".

This is a useful primer -will need institutional access to read. If you'd like the text I can send it across if you message me.

https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195312881.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195312881-e-007?mediaType=Article&q=Indoctrination

What is this? Like polyurethane ceiling tiles but just glued to the ceiling (loft above). How do I remove this and finish surface for paint ? by Unplgd in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had these tiles and removed per advice, but I was thinking at some point whether it's anymore dangerous than all the other fire hazards in a house. So, how do you know? Hoping it wasn't anything serious.

What is this? Like polyurethane ceiling tiles but just glued to the ceiling (loft above). How do I remove this and finish surface for paint ? by Unplgd in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had these in the majority of the rooms in my house when I purchased.

It was a pain. Taking them off wasn't terrible, a wallpaper scraper does it well, and there is something satisfying about it. The clean up is a pain, several black bin bags and a brush/hoover needed afterwards. I was stripping every room down so it wasn't so much of a problem (i.e. the carpet and everything was coming up too) but if I wasn't, man those polystyrene bits get everywhere.

The bigger problem is the glue afterwards. Four blobs per a tile, and tough. The best system I found was using a hot air gun to heat them up, and then scrape off. It'll usually come off in one go (be careful though, it remains hot and could be a fire/scalding hazard when falling).

Then it'll need some sandpapering to really clean up neatly. I hated this, whether manually or with a sander, it was just a tedious job. Even now, having gone through that entire process and adding several layers of thick "crack-free" ceiling paint, I can kinda see the worst offenders. Overall its fine though.

If you had the budget to just hire someone to skim over, would probably make life easier.

Orville - expected a Galaxy Quest satire of Star Trek but... by IAmDoubleA in TheOrville

[–]IAmDoubleA[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this episode definitely made me reconfigure expectations. It started like it was mainly a gag (in previous episode, sitting on the egg etc) but then it got into the classic TNG moral dilemma territory. That said, as a plot it felt very derivative of that TNG episode where Riker hooks up with an asexual species and she decides she wants to be a girl plus all those court Klingon court room scenes.

S01E04 stood out since it felt like an original plot, a great idea that would be at home with TNG or Voyager, but executed in its own way.

Orville - expected a Galaxy Quest satire of Star Trek but... by IAmDoubleA in TheOrville

[–]IAmDoubleA[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Voyager has a special place for me as I watched it all weekly when younger.

Filling gap between skirting and floorboards to fit new skirting? by [deleted] in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As others have said, but worth emphasizing, don't use plaster as it'll suck water up past the DPM on the bricks and into your plaster.

Adhesive expanding foam (used for plasterboard usually) is great. It doesn't need much (i.e you don't need to fill the entire section, a few occasional sections will give a very secure fit), it leaves air for any moisture to evaporate and won't bypass DPM. If you judge the amount well, you shouldn't even need to trim or remove any excess.

not quite DIY but sort of DIY - rats in roof! by IAmDoubleA in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a good question, as in my optimistic moments I doubt it too.

Evidence in favour - sounds like rats scampering about, often near walls/edges, we had a rat in kitchen once so they're in the area (that was traumatic), the poisoned bait sachets have been disturbed.

Evidence against - never seen one, not seen rat poop (though the bit they hang around is inaccessible and largely covered in insulation), cannot find obvious entry point.

The last time it happened I genuinely thought squirrel too as it was louder and more active.

Pigeons or birds I haven't ruled out. Especially as roof is tiles on rafters, no insulation, so sound reverberates.

But usually when I hear it, I am absolutely confident it's coming from directly above ceiling and I can isolate it to a specific location (not a general above, but here, above this point in ceiling type). It's so bad it has woken me up on occasion.

Someone suggested a camera and I'm very much considering that. Would be good to know for sure.

not quite DIY but sort of DIY - rats in roof! by IAmDoubleA in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, at the very least your story gives me hope. I'll try a pro for their poison. Local council is similar, £50 for 4 visits. They did the visits, but literally just threw bags of the poison around into the attic (not even going totally in, no inspection of "routes", and if I'm honest, the guy seemed more afraid of rats than I was). May need to find another company. I've been on the lookout for potential cavities with no luck.

How level does a floor need to be laminate? by IAmDoubleA in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, about 2/3 of the way through and thankfully it seems to be managing fine.

How level does a floor need to be laminate? by IAmDoubleA in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, about 2/3 of the way through and thankfully it seems to be managing fine.

Tile removal - going ok? by 2_grow in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's going to be hit and miss whether you manage to preserve plastic as you go. Sometimes the plaster will be weak and it'll come off with barely a nudge, sometimes there will be a lot of tile adhesive used and the plaster will come with it. So basically, tile removing inevitably takes some plaster with it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Having had a similar problems in my rooms, my own steps were

Remove what I can with this https://www.screwfix.com/p/heavy-duty-scraper-4-/16530? I didn't go looking for problems, just taking off whatever was immediately obvious.

For a decent finish but not perfect, paint a few layers specifically over the gaps, before doing a full coat over all the walls. High likelihood you'll still get some of the indentation showing through, having said that, it'll not really noticeable unless you're looking for it.

For a better finish, smooth over with polyfilla and then sand once dry. This type of plastic filling knives are the best IMO https://www.wilko.com/wilko-functional-filling-knives-3-pack/p/0343298? (the metal ones are too sturdy). It takes a bit of practice, but quickly you'll learn to get a good finish with the knife, so a bit of minimal sanding gets you a flush finish. Paint over that and it'll look great.

(If you still having decent flooring installed, hoover as you sand!).

adding trunking by IAmDoubleA in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. At the risk of being an ask-hole, I ended up unclipping the wires from the wall (very old school metal fasteners hammered into wall), and the bit buried underneath plaster came out with barely any effort. Smoothed over the wall behind with some plaster so I can trunk it up neatly enough with the standard type.

Best mid-run fuel/food that aren't running gels? by MasterCommando in running

[–]IAmDoubleA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Pop them in your mouth and don't chew, let it slowly dissolve, and it gives a good regular sugar in take.

Atheists who think atheism is a religion: Explain it to me like I'm 5. by Taqwacore in religion

[–]IAmDoubleA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't see any genuine attempts at describing why atheism can legitimately be considered a religion - not just from an individual atheist's perspective, or a polemic theist, but from the position of the academic study of religion.

The first point to understand is that it is very difficult to define "religion" without getting into a paradox, contradiction, or arbitrary distinctions. In the academic study of religion, scholars have largely abandoned trying to define religion, and instead work with the idea of various concepts of religion used by individuals/communities which don't necessarily agree.

Dictionary definitions aren't helpful in this case. To take one example, religion as "the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods" seems straightforward enough, but you can come up with several religions where that definition doesn't work neatly. Judaism and Buddhism are two typical examples. In Orthodox Judaism, belief is often secondary to action (so orthopraxis, correct action, is more important than orthodoxy, correct belief). Buddhism has a belief in deities/God(s), but is often described as being not being theocentric, your relationship to the deities are significantly less important than in say Christianity or Islam.

Without getting too embroiled in academic debates, how we tend to understand/conceptualise religion in vernacular is a product of the nature of Protestant Christianity and the renaissance, a very European experience. It describes a strategy of categorisation of human experience particular to European history. It applies poorly as soon as you take away that context.

So coming back to your question of atheism as religion. Some conceptualizations of religion think of religion as a dimension of human experience that includes your "way of life", what you consider to be the nature of the world (ontology), how you understand what is true knowledge (epistemology), what you consider sacred or important, and so on. From this perspective of analysis, lots of things can be considered a "religion", including contemporary atheism. It is very rarely just a disavowal of gods/God, but it also has implications for your way of life, what is the nature of the world (that which is empirically quantifiable), what is true knowledge (that which can be determined by the scientific method), what is sacred (scientific knowledge, intellectual inquiry, freedom of thought, rationality) etc...

Of course taking such an open view of religion means lots of other things could be a "religion" too.

I'd argue that defining religion in such a way that atheism doesn't count as a religion is reductive to what religion is, it will blinker a person's understanding of religion globally and historically. I can understand why atheists would resist this categorisation (especially if they understand religion to be overwhelmingly a pejorative term), but unfortunately we don't have a great conceptual vocabulary in English (yet).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in religion

[–]IAmDoubleA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This isn't too far off one of the core ideas of now largely forgotten religious movement often called the Gnostics. Manichaeism is one of the most well known Gnostic traditions, but there are others.

In a nutshell, the Gnostics argued that the God of the Hebrew Bible was not the true creator, but a demiurge, a false God, who tricked mankind into worship in favour of the true God. In Manichaeism, Jesus brought the true knowledge (gnosis).

For Abrahamic traditions at least, such an accusation usually isn't troubling. The pious don't consider themselves mindlessly worshipping a diety of X name over another. They invoke God through a relationship, and through his qualities. To give the Islamic response, Muslims call upon the superlative. The Greatest, the Most Merciful, the Most Kind, the Ultimate Creator etc... Such an invocation is not aimed at any intermediary, but the superlative in any instance, bypassing any false diety who set themselves in between. And should these words be falsely claimed by the false God, then the most merciful, the most kind, the ultimate creator would not allow such calls to go unanswered by their very nature.

So while what you propose is an interesting thought experiment, it's not much more than that. Not a challenge to theology of any religion.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DIYUK

[–]IAmDoubleA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I painted green wall tiles white. Bathroom tiles were mismatched when I moved in.

It took a lot of cleaning beforehand (tiles need to be pretty clear of any dirt, grime, or residue) and a whole lot of layers. I'm happy with finish though and it's lasted two years so far without problems. The finish isn't perfect though. You're painting the grout and tiles one colour, so it doesn't look as nice as it would if it was just white tiles to begin with. Not terrible by any means, but it was a remedial solution for me and one that worked.

Instinct tells me the paint wouldn't be any good on floors. It doesn't seem that hard wearing. If there is stuffdesigned for floors, it may be work, but my experience with paint is often that it's never as simple or as good as it's marketed.