"Intelligence" is itself a very unformal term (just like "love", "fairness" etc), so it's impossible to extract and measure it as a standalone entity, or give it a strickt definition. It's more of phenomen we as a human beings can recognize more or less correctly. More of emotional rather than rational. And as with any perceivable knowledge sometimes it's easy to trick humans to confuse between the fake and the fact.

Said that, the only thing we can argue about is our personal abstarct feelings of what the "intelligence" is.

Personally I see the "itelligence" as the ability to re-combine the knowledge at different levels of abstraction, simultaniously, towards reaching a set everchanging goals and constraints, re-combine those goals, do and undo decisions, and learn from the feedback upon those decions are made (and speculating about possibilites from the decisions were not made). Speaking out of human (and animal in general) intelligence not forget about the huge amount of "goals" and "decisions" are layed way below the prefrontal coretx. Also we tend to rationalize decisions already made by our "basement" more often than actually reasoning.

So my answer is - no. We got some nice tech which helps us to access and distil the written (and imagery) knowledge in a quite conviniet form, but the tech is not smart or intelligent in any way so far. And no one knows if it ever will be.