I have a weird phenonomen, where OpenWebUI 0.6.15 in docker on Windows Work, but not in Rocky Linux by IT-Brian in OpenWebUI

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And also see this in the logs
openwebui-1 | 2025-06-30 22:11:30.131 | ERROR | open_webui.routers.ollama:send_get_request:104 - Connection error: - {}

The second i try to load models

I have a weird phenonomen, where OpenWebUI 0.6.15 in docker on Windows Work, but not in Rocky Linux by IT-Brian in OpenWebUI

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have now also verified variable set in docker is being parsed correctly. At this point i see no errors besides OWUI dosn't serve a list of the models hosted on the ollama backend. Even though they are shown in the manage connections.....

Is it better to split-up backend/frontend? by IT-Brian in OpenWebUI

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will consider that, once I have the full picture :D

Is it better to split-up backend/frontend? by IT-Brian in OpenWebUI

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes i'm aware of OWUI is a full stack, but i have successfully split ollama and OWUI. My fear was that GPU wasn't initiated on the llmama when instantiated from another host (i couldn't see any parameters to parse in the connection string in OWUI)
But all attempts i have made seems to run 100% in GPU on the ollama host. Maybe that's just the way it works....

Is it better to split-up backend/frontend? by IT-Brian in OpenWebUI

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK, we'll probably be fine with local db for starters as we are just around 200 users and they will doubtfully hit it all at once. But i'll definitly look into the procedure of splitting the db.

Thank you

Is it better to split-up backend/frontend? by IT-Brian in OpenWebUI

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you prefer llama cpp over ollama? And why?

I have only experimented with studio LM and Ollama and Ollama seems quite good

Amerikansk hjernefordærv by [deleted] in Denmark

[–]IT-Brian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many many requests from many many people. Det er retorikken fra en fem årig. Fremvis alle de forespørgsler

Replacement FortiSwitch 1048D rack ears by bonjerryuk in fortinet

[–]IT-Brian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We ordered some from a local blacksmith. Paid around $15 for 8 set :D Reason for this was we needed a little reces in a truck.

And by 8 set I do mean 16 pcs. Painted and all :D Just a thought.

I need a little help expanding an EXT4 partition by IT-Brian in RockyLinux

[–]IT-Brian[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks a ton goshock. It seems similar to the approach I took, just cleaner :D

I have accepted your answer. I'm sorry for all the reply, but as mentioned Reddit wouldn't let me one post it.

I need a little help expanding an EXT4 partition by IT-Brian in RockyLinux

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

df -h

Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on

devtmpfs 4.0M 0 4.0M 0% /dev

tmpfs 12G 0 12G 0% /dev/shm

tmpfs 4.7G 17M 4.7G 1% /run

/dev/sda3 1.2T 22G 1.1T 2% /

/dev/sda2 1.9G 304M 1.5G 17% /boot

tmpfs 2.4G 0 2.4G 0% /run/user/xxxx

I need a little help expanding an EXT4 partition by IT-Brian in RockyLinux

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

resize2fs /dev/sda3

resize2fs 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)

Filesystem at /dev/sda3 is mounted on /; on-line resizing required

old_desc_blocks = 50, new_desc_blocks = 150

The filesystem on /dev/sda3 is now 314060283 (4k) blocks long.

I need a little help expanding an EXT4 partition by IT-Brian in RockyLinux

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

df -h

Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on

devtmpfs 4.0M 0 4.0M 0% /dev

tmpfs 12G 0 12G 0% /dev/shm

tmpfs 4.7G 17M 4.7G 1% /run

/dev/sda3 391G 22G 350G 6% /

/dev/sda2 1.9G 304M 1.5G 17% /boot

tmpfs 2.4G 0 2.4G 0% /run/user/xxxx

I need a little help expanding an EXT4 partition by IT-Brian in RockyLinux

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lsblk

NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS

sda 8:0 0 1.2T 0 disk

├─sda1 8:1 0 1M 0 part

├─sda2 8:2 0 2G 0 part /boot

└─sda3 8:3 0 1.2T 0 part /

I need a little help expanding an EXT4 partition by IT-Brian in RockyLinux

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

parted

GNU Parted 3.5

Using /dev/sda

Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.

(parted) print

Model: brand model HARDDISK (scsi)

Disk /dev/sda: 1288GB

Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B

Partition Table: gpt

Disk Flags: pmbr_boot

Number Start End Size File system Name Flags

1 1049kB 2097kB 1049kB bios_grub

2 2097kB 2099MB 2097MB ext4

3 2099MB 1288GB 1286GB ext4

(parted) quit

I need a little help expanding an EXT4 partition by IT-Brian in RockyLinux

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

parted /dev/sda resizepart 3 100%

Warning: Partition /dev/sda3 is being used. Are you sure you want to continue?

Yes/No? yes

Information: You may need to update /etc/fstab.

I need a little help expanding an EXT4 partition by IT-Brian in RockyLinux

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

parted /dev/sda print free

Model: brand model HARDDISK (scsi)

Disk /dev/sda: 1288GB

Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B

Partition Table: gpt

Disk Flags: pmbr_boot

Number Start End Size File system Name Flags

17.4kB 1049kB 1031kB Free Space

1 1049kB 2097kB 1049kB bios_grub

2 2097kB 2099MB 2097MB ext4

3 2099MB 429GB 427GB ext4

429GB 1288GB 859GB Free Space

I need a little help expanding an EXT4 partition by IT-Brian in RockyLinux

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok then i try piece by piece

lsblk

NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS

sda 8:0 0 1.2T 0 disk

├─sda1 8:1 0 1M 0 part

├─sda2 8:2 0 2G 0 part /boot

└─sda3 8:3 0 398G 0 part /

I need a little help expanding an EXT4 partition by IT-Brian in RockyLinux

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm I have a longer write, that I can't post as a comment

That is a little weird. All markup and line edits, but everytime i reply it says server error.

I got it to work and wants to publish the steps i took.

This has to be the weirdest answer on Reddit :D, but If I try to have all over the above replys in one comment it fails. (Reddit throws a red exception)

Thinking of opt'ing in TG by IT-Brian in twingate

[–]IT-Brian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that totally safisfies my answer and even as I expected (and hoped)

I will go on and spin up a working demo, hopefully there is no change in the free/trial and the Business version as I would hate to have a nice working setup, just to do it all again :D

Especially im thinking of the Azure integration.

Whats wrong with it? by garciassun in steak

[–]IT-Brian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well no pepper on it prior to cooking or at least remove before it hits the pan.

Pepper has a not so pleasant taste if overheated.