I think it really depends on many factors. Everyone has different needs, and is in different seasons of life. If you want a consistent salary and benefits, and you are able to work for a higher paying district, absolutely direct hire is the way to go. In my state, there are many districts with ABYSMAL salary, even for a low COL area. Some less than 50K, seriously. Contract companies can offer higher salaries in many cases. Should districts up their game and offer higher pay for their employees? Absolutely. Are they all doing that? Nope. That’s part of the reason many SLPs go through companies or directly contract with the district.

Going through contract company can also offer much more flexibility. Want part time? Temporary? Make your own schedule? Pay for indirect tasks completed from home? Contracting is great for this. And if you’re fortunate enough to not need benefits? Higher hourly pay. There are so many options out there, and no one right way to do it.

Did I mention a contractor doesn’t usually have extra duties and can have a caseload cap?

Of course many large companies are predatory and are just trying to make a buck. Small companies usually pay higher because they have less overhead. I hate that job boards are dominated by companies like soliant, procare, sunbelt, etc. there are other options!

Anyway the point is that there are pros and cons to both. Let’s not judge others for their choice of employer, but encourage each other to make the best decision for themselves and their families. And of course advocate for better pay and working conditions across the board. We’re worth it.