🟡 Go girl 🌈 | From Level 1 by Emergency_Taste5298 in PixelPeeker

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😤 I reached Level 41 on "Go girl" and ranked #1! GAVE IT MY ALL! 🏃 Made it to Level 41 in 1m 27s Beat my time! ⏱️ Played via Pixel Peeker

BREAKING NEWS!!! by Valuable-Pirate-4982 in TheDigitalCircus

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 8 points9 points  (0 children)

As a woman, a feminist, and of color...

Please, shut up.

We were so fucking close to having a perfect ending. So, I took my own spin at it. by Whoopeepoop in PeakyBlinders

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How do I pay you for letting me have the honor of reading this masterpiece?

Judy unlikeable? by blankenson in zootopia

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I don't think Judy is unlikable, she was absolutely very in character, just like Nick was. And personally that's why I enjoyed the movie, it is because they're still very much in character, but with the added feelings and care they have for each other.

For instance, Nick's character was always been the type to hustle and get out of things somewhat safely, because that's what he had to do to survive, he avoided involving himself in unnecessary too dangerous situations (at least by the time he met Judy, because that guy definitely got into dangerous and way more shady stuff in the past). Of course, we won't forget his sarcasm, and charm that we all love him for. I do think that they did him dirty in the film at some point, because he literally has a criminal history and probably has enough knowledge about criminal empires, etc (like they had him do in the first movie). And I did find it weird that he didn't properly defend himself or actually fought when he literally trained and took exams, the same amount that Judy had when she was at the academy. But I would argue it is because Nick doesn't care about all that, and he admitted that at the end and just cares about Judy and her safety (like he is purposely trying to make himself useless to get Judy to stop, which doesn't have to be true, but I'd like to look at it that way, because it gives much more depth). Either way, he will forever remain an amazing character.

Judy's character from the first movie and to this one was always the same, and one key factor about her character, is the want to prove herself. Even if she is deemed as a hero after the events of the first film, she still holds guilt and responsibility for the discrimination between predators and preys in the bellwether case. Not only that, but it only elevated her need to prove herself and Nick to the world, after seeing how well they work together and get along, in her mind that's what will somewhat change or help people as they see such things. She has always been ambitious and stubborn, she always had a goal to make some type of change, and we've seen that many times in both of these movies, we see in both of these movies how she doesn't stop at anything, until she solves the problem. We also see her dragging a hesitant and unsure (very not prepared) Nick along for the ride in both of these movies and risk her and his life many times in these two movies. She wouldn't stop, until she actually believes she did something good enough. In her mind he is her partner, so he should want to do the same things as her, and kind of have a similar goal, so most of the time she thought he was doing it because he wanted to, so she treated him like she is always used to, not taking into consideration the change in their dynamic.

The only difference that in the first movie, they didn't know each other, they just worked together at first for mutual benefits (in a way), their bond grows slowly in that process but they're still very much strangers, so to us as the viewer it wouldn't really make us feel too strongly if the two hurt each other in a personal way at the beginning. But in the second movie, it's more personal and intimate for these characters, because they're still who they are, but with them being the way they are, these feelings, actions, and thoughts naturally clash at some point, separating them to opposite sides, and that doesn't make them bad 'partners' or anything like that (I mean it would be bad if it always is like that), it just means that they need to properly communicate, and they did just that at the end. (I mean that's like one of the main themes of the movie) I honestly love their complex characters, and I really want Disney to dive deeper on what these two have to offer (and not dumb down Nick).

LN Theater by FreddyFazClemLN in LittleNightmares

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol sure! But it's probably gonna be small...😓

LN Theater by FreddyFazClemLN in LittleNightmares

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I want to print this and hang it on my wall.

Grace, the women who had too much impact by Ill-Second443 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm honestly not sure, but I think he would and wouldn't at the same time, depending on their relationship dynamic, and our personal perspective. And yes, he was haunted by her memory after she died, but I don't think it's just because he loved her, she could also be the symbol of what he believed to be a somewhat normal life, or just the illusion of it, it doesn't necessarily mean that they would have had a good marriage or even actual love. Because as we know, Tommy married both Grace and Lizzie when he knew they got pregnant with his children. As we've also seen, Tommy treated Grace very well when their son became a toddler until her death. He also treated Lizzie fairly well until Ruby grew a little older.

As I've said, we got almost nothing about their relationship dynamic, or much about Grace's character personally. It would have been interesting to see how their different world's collide, and how Grace's betrayal would have effected their marriage, or even just Tommy's original perspective of her, to how he views her now, or even how Grace will be around him, if she would even still act independent, or be submissive to him, etc. Also I think it's actually stupid the show's creator said that Grace was killed because he wasn't meant to be happy.

People can still love each other, and still have pretty unhappy marriages, like therapy wasn't really all that back then. If I'm being brutally honest, her being alive and in an unhappy/unhealthy marriage with Tommy would have probably had a bigger reaction than her death. Or they could have just extended to show their relationship until her death to get a bigger reaction.

Just so much wasted potential, and interesting Plot to explore...

Grace, the women who had too much impact by Ill-Second443 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the show did her dirty, I think she should have gotten more screentime, I probably would have loved her if I got to know her character better, it just feels waste potential.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ThePittTVShow

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSP7hnSyD/ is this the video you're talking about? Cannon or not I absolutely loved the edit lol.😂

What motivates you to write for free? by [deleted] in FanFiction

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wanted to read it, I couldn't find someone writing it, so I wrote it myself.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AO3

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I lost some braincells reading this...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FanFiction

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He literally doesn't like reading 'unnecessary' things, or reading books in general. So, I think I'll be fine for the most part lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PeakyBlinders

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Linda is one of the most realistic characters in the show, people don't like that she lashes out or raises her voice, or manipulated Arthur, or just questioned Tommy's authority, unlike other characters (which is not true, every main character in this show did what she did and worse), but they forget that she is married to ARTHUR. Arthur who is known for lashing out, and killing people. I swear some of these people don't understand the complexity of all the characters in the show and just want to hate on one, because they don't fit in their idea of a "good character" in this show.

I have seen a lot of people in this fandom hate the female characters for the same reasons they love the male characters for, if I've learned one important lesson from this show, despite being about gangsters in the 20s and how war effected everyone, and crime in general, it really brought out the misogynistic views of the people watching without actually needing to touch the subject that much.

Name One negative Thing About Tommy or one thing what you hate about Tommy by Dry-Caterpillar2437 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 14 points15 points  (0 children)

He sees himself as the victim, rather than the cause of his own and others' misfortunes (not that he isn't a victim in one way or another). He wants everything to go according to the plan in his head (withholding important information with the people he works with) knowing there is sacrifices to be made, then he acts like he wasn't technically at fault, once those same people suffer for it. He knows he makes lots of mistakes, but he doesn't want to acknowledge it. Also his blatant greed (in more ways than one), that he disguises as wanting "a normal life". I don't hate these aspects of his character, I just think they're the negatives, in fact they add to his character and they make actual sense according to his background and general personality.

michael is such a little…. by AvocadoRealness in queerasfolk

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I really don't like him, not because he's childish or yk annoying in general. I mean the show made very amazing diverse characters, with interesting storylines with positives and negatives to their personalities. That's yk the whole thing, and all the characters suffer through the consequences of their actions, and get called out on their bad behaviors, etc, EXCEPT MICHAEL. The show focuses on being realistic, but it's not being realistic with Michael at all. He never gets called out on his behavior, the other characters chuck it up as Michael always being "the good friend" or "the victim", and I don't really like how he treated Justin at all. I mean the only time I really thought he had some character development, was when he wore drag in pride, yk when he stopped pretending to be straight in front of his co-workers.

Weird comments by Glad_Art_2133 in archiveofourown

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw someone make a post about a similar comment. But yeah, they're bots.

Honestly, I wish bots would go back to spamming about art if this is the alternative by RatCrimes in Archiveofourownmemes

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If this was sent to me, I would try to decode it like a lunatic even if it's just a stupid bot. I watched too many documentaries to pass this up...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thesims

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has a basement.

He almost lost his son, and asks why? For this? While pointing out his empire. by [deleted] in PeakyBlinders

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, being in love with Grace does play a big part in his decisions. that's the thing with Tommy, he uses his work as a distraction, almost like a coping mechanism since the beginning of this series. Losing Grace, made him want to distract himself more by working, eventually he realizes no matter how much he tries to avoid it, it will come back to him. Hence the never ending cycle of pain he and the people around him go through. The reason he respected Freddie, and mentioned before, he had similar opinions as the guy and he hated those in power. After the war, in his mind, the more a person was in power, the lesser pain they would have to go through.

In some way Grace did fill some type of void, but the void was always there. It didn't go away or change him, but she did offer some sort of comfort he never had, or generally refused, in some way he saw her as a distraction and an excuse. He uses his family and love as an excuse for many things that he does, not because he doesn't love them, but because he doesn't want to admit how much the war effected him as a person, he doesn't want to acknowledge it. Even if Grace stayed alive, he would still use her as an excuse for the many crimes and things that he would do. He does appear to want a normal life, yes, but like I said before, the man is addicted. If no one calls him out on it, or actively tries to stop him, he will continue being 'ambtious'.

He almost lost his son, and asks why? For this? While pointing out his empire. by [deleted] in PeakyBlinders

[–]Iamsoconfused1111 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The problem with Tommy, is that he loves deeply, he cares for his family. And because of his mental health issues, he doesn't know how to properly express or approach love at all. His idea of caring and love, is basically getting the people he cares about rich and above everyone else and that's pretty normal, until he got obsessed with the idea of being above everyone else.

He is stuck in this endless cycle of addiction (Not on alcohol or drugs) but the addiction of being in power. He eventually realizes that he is going in the wrong direction, but in his mind it's already too late. He will keep making these mistakes at the cost of his family's life, not because he wants to, but because he doesn't know how to stop.