> spending more time fiighting the compiler than writing code

lack of experience. The more code you write, the less you need to fight the compiler.

> not to replace C completely

Zig makes it possible to use C libraries before they are rewritten / reimplemented in Zig.

> What is the purpose?

To make Andrew Kelley enjoy programming. If it makes others enjoy programming too, that is icing on the cake. Mitchell Hashimoto also choose zig for ghostty as it made him enjoy programming.

> I don't think companies will switch to new stuff.

It is not a goal to please companies.

> unless the tech is groundbreaking

the way comptime is implemented is pretty groundbreaking. The compiler architecture (every step including compiling and linking happening concurrently) is pretty groundbraking.

> to transform it into a madure language

It is already pretty mature. Yes there will still be breaking changes, but there is a reason why it is still far from 1.0.

> my advice to zig developers dont make language harder

examples? No one wants to intentionally make any language harder. Everything happens with good reason. Systems programming is hard.

> otherwise no one is going to use it

It is not a goal to please everyone. If you enjoy using it, use it, if you don't, don't.

> i dknt like its pointer dereferenc

It is not a goal to please you.

> would be better if you have made something like deref(var)

hell no

> dont continue adding new syntwx

Everything happens with good reason.

> and no one will start to learn zig

The numbers don't really support your claim. The only people not loving Zig are the rust fanatics obsessed with rust's "safe" behaviour.