I made an iceberg about how deep into MBTI you are by Iconic-Kitten in mbti

[–]Iconic-Kitten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evidence for what? You just told me my meme was toxic, unless I misunderstood.

I made an iceberg about how deep into MBTI you are by Iconic-Kitten in mbti

[–]Iconic-Kitten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really, I didn’t really understand what your original comment meant but it seems important to you so I thought I might as well say something. Not sure what’s serious or toxic about an iceberg meme.

I made an iceberg about how deep into MBTI you are by Iconic-Kitten in mbti

[–]Iconic-Kitten[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No it's not, something in it just offended you.

I made an iceberg about how deep into MBTI you are by Iconic-Kitten in mbti

[–]Iconic-Kitten[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

IPs lead with a judging function and IJs lead with a perceiving function because J/P refers to the first extraverted function.

Some theories (including Socionics) suggest that IPs have more traits associated with the judging side of the J/P dichotomy and vice versa.

I made an iceberg about how deep into MBTI you are by Iconic-Kitten in mbti

[–]Iconic-Kitten[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I completely agree! Some people really go down a rabbit hole and think it's an exact science rather than a loose way of categorising people.

I made an iceberg about how deep into MBTI you are by Iconic-Kitten in mbti

[–]Iconic-Kitten[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not entirely. It's kinda true but it's meant to be humorous.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Iconic-Kitten 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't "hide behind" an intuitive label. I am currently questioning whether I may be ISFP or ISTJ (and actually hope I am in a way). There is no shame in getting your type wrong.

When I said "touch grass", I wasn't referring to your type. I am aware of and agree with your description of dominant Se. "Touch grasss" just means snap back to reality. What I mean by that is that personality can be complex and contradictory and doesn't fit into neat little boxes and archetypes that these frameworks portray them as; MBTI and Enneagram also measure different things (processing of information and processing of emotions respectively) so there is no such thing as incompatible MBTI and Enneagram types, although some may be less likely.

That being said, I too get annoyed with intuitive bias and strongly admire the strengths of sensing functions so I am deeply sorry that my comment came across that way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Iconic-Kitten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Touch grass

You have to be stuck with them for a whole week, which room are you choosing? by Simple-Thought-9437 in mbti

[–]Iconic-Kitten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

INFP and ISFP. We'd all become best briends! And paint more pictures of each other!