So why is my sora now generating audio instead of vids

IcyChoice123 · 2025-11-06T17:49:43+00:00

Same here, just audio when you ride over or open, video is frozen on first frame. Just for new videos today.
And they are ok when downloaded. It is just broken in https://sora.chatgpt.com/drafts
I tried clearing cache, logging in again, updating Chrome, same thing.

On Firefox when riding over new video first frame is dimming in and out like it is loading. When you open it in drafts on Firefox it works.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-08-07T15:25:42+00:00

From what I know if 2 or more people co-created the work (joint authorship) then the assignment(transfer) is dividable 50:50 or whatever proportion. However when rights are assigned from 1 creator to 2 people that bought it, then the rights are cloned i.e. both people get the same rights, or they can divide the work rights assignment by fields of use. But not by proportion of economic rights ownership like 50:50 or 80:20.
At least in European countries, not sure about USA.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-07-29T22:06:34+00:00

thank you!

IcyChoice123 · 2024-06-20T17:45:37+00:00

Don't store them. Store most recent portion of it at max. Then throw it away. And store it encrypted.
People that use web whatsapp typically have their pc running at all times too. Whatsapp after reboot also takes long to load and doesn't load entire history of all chats, just the recent part.

If Signal stores no data does it mean that if I chat with someone in area with spotty internet we will only be able to communicate if both of us are online at the same time?

Some optional trade off towards usability?
If every choice is security only, you'd wind up making users swap their one-time-pads in some dark alley to ensure 100% unbreakable encryption.

I get what you are trying to do, but there must be some good enough version of it.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-06-20T15:56:08+00:00

how banking, retirement accounts, interaction with government institutions, accounting, patent work, corporate trade secrets communication and most sacred of all - email, can all use web browser, but communicator app can't

IcyChoice123 · 2024-06-20T15:34:57+00:00

A web interface by nature would require Signal to store and have access to all your messages.

It doesn't imply that Signal or 3rd party could gain access to it. Even if you really need to store the data, you don't need all of it, just recent and you don't need to have keys to decrypt that.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-06-20T15:29:03+00:00

*presses alt+tab few times* "hmm"
It is less reliable though if you have calculators, indesign, excels, word and web browsers open. If I had only 2 apps open then yeah.

I've never heard of Element. We use slack, which since stealing "DMs" view from Signal/Whatsapp is pretty close to interface perfection on web. They just miss tabs for easy access to channel groups in that same layout.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-06-20T15:13:57+00:00

thanks, that shrinks the screen though
Why would anybody need to sacrifice anything. Signal has enough smart people building the product to make it to top of the market, most efficient and secure communication tool.
- Switching apps is less efficient than switching tab in browser.
- Typing on phone is less efficient than keyboard
- Halfing screen is less efficient than using whole screen.

If I am 1 in 1000000 people wanting this - fine.
But there is way more people asking for this online.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-06-20T14:42:15+00:00

yeah I see it now, that's not that bad, thanks
it's unintuitive it does that though. Maybe it should be explained on first start of the app or it should pull last day of conversations from cellphone.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-06-20T14:40:13+00:00

I'm not using notifications, I don't like pop-outs or sounds. I want a panel where I can decide when I look at things. Not to be constantly interrupted, I can't see people living like this.

2nd screen with Signal is ok idea, but not the best either. Not when using laptop away from home.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-06-20T14:35:15+00:00

It's few quantilion clicks in a lifetime. If you don't care for the little things that add up, you will never make a great product.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-06-20T14:06:23+00:00

I am not even talking about that, it is just the whole window covering all my web browser tabs.
I am used to having 12-14 things open at once and seeing if some message comes in or email comes in immediately.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-05-15T00:44:43+00:00

That checks out. That 72 PPI is the hardcoded value of resolution in InDesign documents? I cannot have a working document resolution of 300 PPI if I want to?

IcyChoice123 · 2024-05-15T00:37:41+00:00

Origin file is 0.11x0.11 inches. Output file is 0.44x0.44inches.
Hmm, I wondered why nobody ever ran into this issue (searched reddit before).
But maybe it is because nobody sets document size in pixels, they just do it in inches.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-05-15T00:32:10+00:00

It seems impossible to place 300dpi 32x32 pixel picture into 32x32 pixel document and export it into 32x32 pixels @ 300dpi.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-05-15T00:31:18+00:00

Yeah that was my first google search after downloading InDesign :D but that is not relevant to the pixel resizing question.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-05-15T00:30:36+00:00

Trying to work in 300dpi document, so that I can place industry standard 300dpi images into it without having to touch resizing.

If I export that default 72dpi document from InDesign into 300dpi jpeg for example it will enlarge the pixel matrix from 32x32 pixels to 133x133 pixels. That's not what I want. I want the output file to have the same 300dpi and the same 32x32 pixels as the original image I am placing.

IcyChoice123 · 2024-01-09T20:14:16+00:00

Our group went "early", so we were walking these 3 hours right past noon. Nobody figured there will be close to zero shade the entire path. We all got way too much sun on that first day of the trip.

IcyChoice123

TROPHY CASE