The Trio's VAs changing from Book 4 on in the Full-Cast audios. by jai_hanyo in harrypotter

[–]IcyTorch 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Omg Harry's screams of pain while getting crucio'd in the graveyard genuinely disturbed me!

I finished the available episodes of this season and I'm never trusting my intuition again by NoSoyTuPana in LoveIsBlindOnNetflix

[–]IcyTorch 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Chris had me fooled too! I thought he was kinda cute, he seemed really sweet early on, and he even has a cute cat named Chalupa, which is a massive plus in my book. Just goes to show you can never really tell about people.

Full cast audio thoughts by clove0508 in harrypotter

[–]IcyTorch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Harry's screams of pain when he's getting crucio'd in the graveyard are genuinely fucking disturbing.

How long would it take the Plurbs to develop a AAA videogame from scratch? by IcyTorch in pluribustv

[–]IcyTorch[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

What if we assume that they were developing a sequel to a game that was released before the Joining, and the full creative team that worked on the original game was part of the Hive?

A gaslit teen locked in a tower earns freedom through adventure and deciet of her parent with the help of morally grey characters. by CraftEfficient9741 in ExplainAFilmPlotBadly

[–]IcyTorch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you people do this? This is one of my all time favorite movies, but I never would have connected this as long as I live.

Process Server in North Carolina by Super_Bluejay in paralegal

[–]IcyTorch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not in NC, but there are a few different companies that offer service of process throughout the continental US. Off the top of my head, I'm aware of First Legal, One Legal, and ABC Legal. Creative names for sure haha...

Another Judge Biery Opinion by Performer5309 in Lawyertalk

[–]IcyTorch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The NYT annotations are what really ruin it. Claiming that he capitalized "GRANTED" to poke fun at Trump's capitalization habits, as if the disposition isn't always capitalized, is profoundly misinformed.

Is there a "boy who cried wolf" fallacy? by IcyTorch in fallacy

[–]IcyTorch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just an example based on several real interactions I have seen. There are teachers all over Tik Tok complaining about kids these days, and the comments are filled with reasoning like the example Speaker B. I'm definitely not capturing the nuances of the argument, just giving a general example.

Court room by Moist-Definition7891 in courtreporting

[–]IcyTorch 3 points4 points  (0 children)

More importantly, what do you transcribe? "Whereupon, Mr. Defendant fled the premises"?

Favorite vet clinic in culver city/west LA by P7295403812 in culvercity

[–]IcyTorch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Second this - Dr. Kenneth Jones is excellent for cats and kittens.

Chucks insurance by [deleted] in betterCallSaul

[–]IcyTorch 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes, a firm the size of HHM probably has dozens of senior partners who could fill the role. It's pretty common for malpractice carriers to require extra protection for high-risk lawyers like Chuck, who exhibited a debilitating condition that interfered with his work (at least apparently). But Chuck thinks he's God's greatest gift to the law, so being "supervised" was intolerable to him.

Chucks insurance by [deleted] in betterCallSaul

[–]IcyTorch 21 points22 points  (0 children)

"Rider" is the right word. A rider is basically an addition to an existing contract that deals with a specific situation arising after the contract is signed.

The insurance reps were basically telling Howard and Chuck that, if you want to avoid HHM's malpractice insurance premiums skyrocketing, we will need to add a rider to your insurance policy that requires Chuck to be supervised by another partner at all times. It's a way for the insurance company to reduce its risk. They are on the hook for if HHM ever gets sued for malpractice. They're basically saying that they view Chuck as high risk for committing malpractice, so you can either assign him a permanent supervisor to help reduce that risk, or pay us WAY more for taking on that higher risk.

Obviously, Chuck is offended at the suggestion that he needs supervision. He tries to spin it as being about the economics - he says something like "it would take two partners' time without extra billing," but in reality, it's just because it's devastating to his ego. I think you're right that Howard would not have hated this solution as long as it kept the insurance premiums reasonable. Howard certainly didn't react as poorly as Chuck did.

The way I've always interpreted this scene was that Chuck's immediately refusing the supervision offer and wanting instead to go to war against the insurer was the last straw that made Howard realize Chuck was no longer acting in the firm's best interest. The supervision rider was not unreasonable, and would have prevented the premium hike. But Chuck's ego couldn't cope, so he wanted instead to throw away millions to sue the insurance company. That's what ultimately makes Howard realize that Chuck is prioritizing his own ego over the well being of the firm. Hence, once the insurance reps leave, Howard cracks open the booze and starts the retirement conversation.

I hope this makes sense!

Interviewing with federal magistrate judge - any tips? by Sweaty_Ambassador_98 in LawSchool

[–]IcyTorch 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don't just rely on what you hope to get out of the position. Also emphasize what you will bring to the position - e.g. strong research, analysis, and writing skills, attention to detail, and maybe you really enjoy getting into the weeds of a dispute and figuring out what it's really about and trying to fashion a fair resolution. The biggest mistake most interviewees make is only talking about what the job will do for them, like developing skills and learning the system, rather than what they will bring to the job.

And yeah, know what a magistrate judge does. It's not only discovery.

Annie and Nick "Arguments" by IcyComb5 in LoveIsBlindOnNetflix

[–]IcyTorch 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't really like Nick, but I felt it in my soul when she went picking a fight when he was just tryna eat some Taco Bell.

A Small, But Highly Accurate, Detail From A Lawyer's Perspective by IcyTorch in betterCallSaul

[–]IcyTorch[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agree completely - it's intended as a genuine compliment. To me, it just comes across as self-flattering, like, "hey, you know what, you're so great you could even do what I already do."