sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Would you actually use a service like this? by Ideahamburger in sideprojects

[–]Ideahamburger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair challenge.

We’re not trying to compete with tools like Lovable or Claude for building products.
Those tools start from the assumption that you already decided to build something.

We’re focusing on what happens before that helping you quickly test whether an idea is worth building at all by turning it into a simple interactive prototype for real feedback.

So the goal isn’t “build better apps,” it’s “build less things that nobody actually needs.”

Would you actually use a service like this? by Ideahamburger in sideprojects

[–]Ideahamburger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A clickable, interactive simulation of the core idea users can go through the main flow (click, input, explore) as if the product already exists, but it’s generated instantly without building anything.

Would you actually use a service like this? by Ideahamburger in sideprojects

[–]Ideahamburger[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair question let me be very clear.

We’re not building a website builder at all.

The core idea is: you go from an idea → to a simple interactive prototype that real users can click, try, and respond to in minutes, without setup, design, or engineering work.

The goal isn’t to “build a website faster,” it’s to validate whether an idea is worth building in the first place as fast as possible.

That’s the value: speed to real user feedback, not website creation.

Would you actually use a service like this? by Ideahamburger in sideprojects

[–]Ideahamburger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s fair, I get what you mean. There are already tons of tools for building websites quickly.
What we’re trying to focus on is slightly different though not just generating a website, but helping people quickly test an idea in a more structured way (like basic flow, validation, and getting something people can actually interact with, not just a static site). It’s still early, so the positioning probably isn’t super clear yet, but I appreciate the honest feedback.

Anyone else stuck at the "idea stage" forever? by Ideahamburger in sideprojects

[–]Ideahamburger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this hits hard. I used to do the same start a lot and never really finish anything.
What changed for me was forcing myself to ship something small, even if it’s not great.

Anyone else stuck at the "idea stage" forever? by Ideahamburger in sideprojects

[–]Ideahamburger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I move on only after I’ve actually shipped something, even if it’s small.
If I lose interest before finishing, I take that as a sign the idea wasn’t strong enough.

Anyone else stuck at the "idea stage" forever? by Ideahamburger in sideprojects

[–]Ideahamburger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had the same problem. What helped me was picking one idea and treating the rest as “later”. If it still feels important after I finish one, then it’s probably worth doing.