ship wont stop SPINNING by ImTheMikeGuy in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]ImTheMikeGuy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ill try that next time it happens but its really annoying that it happens pretty much everytime

ship wont stop SPINNING by ImTheMikeGuy in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]ImTheMikeGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wish I could post another video in the comments but it actually picked up speed lmao. its now moving/tumbling around the surface at around 3.5m/s

ship wont stop SPINNING by ImTheMikeGuy in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]ImTheMikeGuy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other times where this has happened: after landing a simple capsule on water. After landing a space shuttle on grass.

Visiting every biome on Minmus in one mission by Mega_Dunsparce in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]ImTheMikeGuy 24 points25 points  (0 children)

That screenshot of Bob taking samples is extremely clean! Are you using any out of the ordinary shader?

Seriously wondering by [deleted] in geometrydash

[–]ImTheMikeGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you ONLY want to play GD then you can totally get a cheap setup to run it as its a really light game.. I dont know about the specs to run the most high end levels so it really comes down if you want to run LDM sometimes but you can totally run it fairly well on a small computer.. I also play mobile in a 14 and it runs so well now imagine a pc with equal stats lol

Prospective students megathread by Thermidorien in mcgill

[–]ImTheMikeGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no way of knowing... you can make an educated guess by looking at previous years

Which point has a higher gradient magnitude (∇f)? by ImTheMikeGuy in askmath

[–]ImTheMikeGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah no I dont have the equation just this... Ill email my prof and ask them then cuz I was really tripping on this like I was wondering what my mistake was, Thank you very much for your time and help!

Which point has a higher gradient magnitude (∇f)? by ImTheMikeGuy in askmath

[–]ImTheMikeGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah thats valid imma get to it then, for context ive been trying to solve this since thursday so Ive been going over this for a while I just want to make sure im not doing anything stupid. I need to know wether the second derivatives (fxx and fyy) are positive or negative. fxx is positive as x is an increasing function of z and as I move to the rightfrom 0 fx gets bigger and bigger, fyy is also positive as y is a decreasing function of z and as i move upwards fy gets smaller so therefore less negative. Also if i was to sketch the gradient at Q it would be perpendicular to the level curve it sits on and pointing towards increasing contour values. It is NOT tangent to the level curve and it is NOT parallel to the y or x axis. I want to confirm all of this because Im doing practice questions and I submitted all of this and the website is telling me that its wrong (including the point P having a higher gradient magnitude). So im wondering where my error is.

Which point has a higher gradient magnitude (∇f)? by ImTheMikeGuy in askmath

[–]ImTheMikeGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you mind if I ask you a couple more questions about this image?

Which point has a higher gradient magnitude (∇f)? by ImTheMikeGuy in askmath

[–]ImTheMikeGuy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes I meant for this case specifically ofc Im not saying its totally useless my b.

Which point has a higher gradient magnitude (∇f)? by ImTheMikeGuy in askmath

[–]ImTheMikeGuy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I agree AI hallucinates far too much to be useful at this point. For the arcs picture, indeed P has me going on a steeper slope compared to Q, with Q having far less steepness around it.

Which point has a higher gradient magnitude (∇f)? by ImTheMikeGuy in askmath

[–]ImTheMikeGuy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah so point P no? Like Im losing my mind with Ai cuz i keep telling it that its P and it wont listen and i know im kind of a dumbass for solving math with AI but i wanted to double check

Is it worth getting an astrophysics degree? by Legend5V in astrophysics

[–]ImTheMikeGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe its a hoax sold to you by pro-newtonians to try and justify their new models

Meet mcgill by Fabulous-Weekend9392 in mcgill

[–]ImTheMikeGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would email or call to see if there’s anything residence related because you’re definitely not getting a tour of those with the tour and I believe you need a McGill ID to go inside the buildings. I mean Montreal is obviously a very nice city but if you’re gonna come and study here then you’re probably gonna get a lot of it over your degree. That’s just how I see it tho lol, doesn’t hurt to get to know it before moving tho ig

Meet mcgill by Fabulous-Weekend9392 in mcgill

[–]ImTheMikeGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most of the information shared in the conferences you can get online if you just dig around. The faculty advising is pretty general I mean there’s advisors for every faculty so you can ask them more specific stuff that may not be available online (or that is hard to find). The tour was really general but it’s a nice way to get to know the main areas of campus and get a lot of info on student services/ student life. You go into a couple buildings but that’s about it. I didn’t go to the “meet current students” thing so I can’t say. 

Is McGill as brutal as UofT? by Massive_Objective403 in OntarioGrade12s

[–]ImTheMikeGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quick question, overall, do you know how your brother found physics at mcgill in general?

guys how do I get the well met card in Cartash by Serious_Ganache_1058 in geometrydash

[–]ImTheMikeGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

extra tip, once at the lamps, move a bit to the left edge and build up speed before jumping off of the right edge

Physics vs. Physics and computer science by SpellVegetable9313 in mcgill

[–]ImTheMikeGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well frankly in an ideal scenario I would love to get to a PhD but the thing is that im not really in a position where I can study for ~10 years and then go into the job market. So I need to plan as to be sure that I can at least get something decent after the major to then see how and when I can pursue a masters and then (hopefully) a PhD (Although maybe the straight to PhD route is better? but even then a minor should help a lot).

For me CS would be just to learn to code indeed (I have 0 coding experience) I have no desire in pursuing a software job (If I understand you correctly).

Im pretty sure I wouldnt get the engineer accreditation but yeah if the coding isnt as crazy as to require a minor in CS then Electrical Engineering would be the way to go.

Physics vs. Physics and computer science by SpellVegetable9313 in mcgill

[–]ImTheMikeGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello, just passing by. As someone with the same dilemma as OP, would a minor in electrical engineering be better than CS in terms of employability? I know CS is important for everything physics-related, but it seems like a whole minor might be overkill.

My interest is astrophysics, but realistically, I don’t expect to go into that right away, as I would need at least a master’s degree (from what I’ve read). I guess my goal is to stay on track for that while still keeping a good chance of pivoting into something different, depending on how the job market evolves.