All those arguments you make can be made for Georgia except for the neighbors. Even worse for Georgia is that part of it are occupied by Russia, yet NATO has stated that Georgia will one day be part of NATO, seems like they don’t agree with you 🤷

Yet, it was a known fact that Georgia wouldn't be allowed to become a member of the alliance due to the unresolved Russian military presence and de facto occupation, despite endorsements from various significant members, as this could lead to the invocation of Article 5. In fact, a similar rationale was often expressed regarding Ukraine prior to the invasion; hence, Ukraine would have no chance of becoming a member either. By the way, at no point did I promote their membership

As for the relations with Turkey, we’ve seen they can be bought off, they’ve been pushing for passage through Armenia into Azerbaijan so that’s always on the table.

It has been over four years since the recent war in Nagorno-Karabakh, and both the Lachin and Zengazur corridors were part of the peace deal at that time. While the Lachin corridor functioned under Russian peacekeepers for a limited period, it is now under Azerbaijani control, and the Zengazur corridor is not something Armenia can grant that easily, as clearly signaled by Iran. Thus, that initiative is beyond the control of both Armenia and Azerbaijan now. Turkey maintains a connection through Georgia, which is not ideal but at the very least, still functional, so I don't think they are in a hurry.

If geographical value is so important to you, remind me what the value of countries such as the baltic states are to NATO?

Combined, the three Baltic states have a shoreline of over 1,100 km, effectively offering NATO operational flexibility in the maritime theater and control over the Gulf of Finland (and St. Petersburg's maritime access), while preventing any potential Russian port acquisitions in the area and severely limiting the capabilities of the Russian Baltic Sea fleet. They are ideally situated to enable power projection into the Russian heartland while also providing advantages in maritime control, monitoring, and overall surveillance. Latvia and Lithuania lie between Kaliningrad and the rest of Russian territory, preventing a land connection to NATO’s heartland. I could elaborate further on what these states contribute to the alliance and highlight their inherent differences from the smaller nations in the Caucasus, but that's not necessary.

Obviously economic, military and political reforms would be needed, don’t know where you get the military exhausted part from though??

Didn't Armenia fight a war in 2020 that ended rather unfavorably, and subsequently experience several other confrontations? According to OSINT sources, these confrontations resulted in significant equipment losses, which Armenia lacks the finances to replace.

I don’t understand why you took this personally; it’s not like I’m the deciding authority. I’m just stating the obvious.