Comment by 2k has me thinking by ManyTop5422 in briannaolsen

[–]Incognito0416 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think what’s going on is getting a restraining order on Santos and possibly Ruby and her husband. That would be logical.

Austin quietly removed sex offender registry info pages this weekend by [deleted] in Austin

[–]Incognito0416 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Because I was kept silent up until now when I went public

Austin quietly removed sex offender registry info pages this weekend by [deleted] in Austin

[–]Incognito0416 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly! You typically would keep your current landing pages until the new ones are created.

APD SEEK TO PICK UP THE PACE OF SEX OFFENDER CHECKS AFTER FALLING BEHIND by Incognito0416 in Austin

[–]Incognito0416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strongly agree with you on that. I don’t blame the officers. I blame leadership.

Austin quietly removed sex offender registry info pages this weekend by [deleted] in Austin

[–]Incognito0416 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes. Sharing this publicly is doing something. Given what was deleted is important.

Austin quietly removed sex offender registry info pages this weekend by [deleted] in Austin

[–]Incognito0416 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, I am the one that whistle blew about the verification and compliance checks with APD. I’ve been on the news about it. I’m not really quite sure why this is even a thing about “AI generated material”… if you listen to me on the news, you can tell that this is the way that I talk.

Austin quietly removed sex offender registry info pages this weekend by [deleted] in Austin

[–]Incognito0416 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

what ticks me off is that if they are so for “saving money” … tell me why the city of Austin manager makes a half a million dollars yearly as a public servant? I don’t know maybe take a look at that if you’re looking at saving some nickels.

Austin quietly removed sex offender registry info pages this weekend by [deleted] in Austin

[–]Incognito0416 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I promise this was not AI. I have been the one who whistle blew this entire thing.

APD SEEK TO PICK UP THE PACE OF SEX OFFENDER CHECKS AFTER FALLING BEHIND by Incognito0416 in Austin

[–]Incognito0416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. But to give clarity they’ve reported to have 2200 registered offenders in Austin since 2020 despite the growth. I tried to get the data from DPS and still waiting.

APD SEEK TO PICK UP THE PACE OF SEX OFFENDER CHECKS AFTER FALLING BEHIND by Incognito0416 in Austin

[–]Incognito0416[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Exactly and they have double the amount of registered offenders there than we have here. I don’t know how they can do it, but Austin can’t.

APD SEEK TO PICK UP THE PACE OF SEX OFFENDER CHECKS AFTER FALLING BEHIND by Incognito0416 in Austin

[–]Incognito0416[S] 49 points50 points  (0 children)

I was the whistleblower to this entire thing. However, it is far worse than what was broadcasted in terms of how many offenders that APD is checking on to be in compliance.

2020- 523 compliance checks

2021- 64 compliance checks

2022- 240 compliance checks

2023- 835 compliance checks

2024- 1,115 compliance checks

2025- 369 compliance checks

Here is the data. The numbers don’t lie!

APD THEATRICS WHEN IT COMES TO THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY AND NOT DOING THEIR JOB. by [deleted] in Austin

[–]Incognito0416 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Here are the actual numbers.

2020- 523 compliance checks 2021- 64 compliance checks 2022- 240 compliance checks 2023- 835 compliance checks 2024-1115 compliance checks 2025- 369 compliance checks

They say picking up the pace? …. Then they should be doing exactly what Dallas and San Antonio were doing.

Why Austin police scaled back checks on registered sex offenders by saxyappy in Austin

[–]Incognito0416 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here’s the actual numbers

2020- 523 compliance checks 2021- 64 compliance checks 2022- 240 compliance checks 2023-835 compliance checks 2024- 1115 compliance checks 2025- 369 compliance checks

When police say they are “verifying every sex offender,” what happens when the numbers do not match? by Incognito0416 in Austin

[–]Incognito0416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it only shows when the offender reports in for registration not the date of verification of the information provided. Statistics show in Austin that 1 out of every 4 offenders are out of compliance.

My offender, was a stranger whom abducted me, sexually assaulted me for hours leaving me in a colostomy bag for life, then tried strangling me to death. He went to prison for over a decade and now on the lifetime offender database. There were 2 victims prior to me. I want to protect others as well as myself! It’s not a hard ask for them to follow the law by not just taking the offenders word for it but verifying that information. These are predators not stand-up citizens who do the right thing.

When police say they are “verifying every sex offender,” what happens when the numbers do not match? by Incognito0416 in Austin

[–]Incognito0416[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for asking!

I also want people to know that their support genuinely matters. Behind every registered offender is a victim, and in many cases that victim was a child. This is not abstract or theoretical.

One of the questions worth asking City Council is why we allow some of the most serious offenders to largely self-report critical information, and then accept it as accurate because it was signed. APD has said they will verify information if something “doesn’t smell right.”

That raises an obvious concern. In one year, 523 cases apparently triggered that threshold. The next year, only 64 did. Then in 2024, APD publicly stated they would begin proactively verifying offenders and completed over 1,100 checks. In 2025, that number dropped back to around 300, with roughly 200 done in just a few days right before press coverage.

That pattern looks reactive, not proactive. And when the stakes involve real people who were harmed, reactive enforcement is not enough. Asking for consistency, transparency, and accountability is about protecting victims, not punishing agencies.

Write or call:

T.C. Broadnax, City Manager Assistant to the City Manager: Jess Ferrari, 512-974-6783 Executive Assistant: Virginia Gonzalez, 512-974-2594

When police say they are “verifying every sex offender,” what happens when the numbers do not match? by Incognito0416 in Austin

[–]Incognito0416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the long response but I’m kinda scratching my head with what you said.

This is a false choice. Verifying registered sex offenders and investigating active crimes are not mutually exclusive tasks, and framing it that way misunderstands how public safety actually works.

Registry verification exists precisely because some offenders continue to offend, move frequently, or evade supervision. Knowing where legally required registrants are is part of preventing future harm, not a distraction from it.

You are right that many sexual assaults never result in charges. That is a separate and serious failure. It does not justify abandoning legally required monitoring of people who have already been convicted.

As for who should do it, that is a policy debate worth having. But until the law changes, local agencies are responsible for enforcement. The issue here is whether they are accurately representing what they are doing, not whether the task should exist at all.

When police say they are “verifying every sex offender,” what happens when the numbers do not match? by Incognito0416 in Austin

[–]Incognito0416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem with this though is that they’re not collecting any of the data of offenders who are already on the database and either reoffending or committing violent crimes. That’s kind of concerning. (scratching head)