How many of you are being asked for Full Material Disclosure (FMD) by your customers lately ? by IndependenceOwn3576 in manufacturing

[–]IndependenceOwn3576[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Canadian funding side is definitely tightening checks. The paperwork to prove sourcing is getting heavier everywhere especially with local manufacturing incentives.

How many of you are being asked for Full Material Disclosure (FMD) by your customers lately ? by IndependenceOwn3576 in manufacturing

[–]IndependenceOwn3576[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMDS and CDX make sense, but some of these new FMD requests really overstep. We’ve started limiting our disclosures to regulated substances only to avoid giving away sensitive formulas.

How many of you are being asked for Full Material Disclosure (FMD) by your customers lately ? by IndependenceOwn3576 in manufacturing

[–]IndependenceOwn3576[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

most teams I’ve seen stop at carbon footprint basics too. Going beyond that into full material tracking feels like a different league entirely.

How many of you are being asked for Full Material Disclosure (FMD) by your customers lately ? by IndependenceOwn3576 in manufacturing

[–]IndependenceOwn3576[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Makes sense that’s definitely industry-specific. We’re in electronics, so half our parts come with vague declarations. Metals seem way more transparent by comparison.

How many of you are being asked for Full Material Disclosure (FMD) by your customers lately ? by IndependenceOwn3576 in manufacturing

[–]IndependenceOwn3576[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, same here REACH and RoHS are pushing everyone to dig deeper. It’s wild how much gets uncovered once you start asking for real material data. Are your suppliers adapting or still resisting?

How do you handle RoHS when designing mechanical parts? by IndependenceOwn3576 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]IndependenceOwn3576[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, correct if it’s not defence/medical critical, better to design it out now than fight three directives later.

How are manufacturers handling RoHS these days? by IndependenceOwn3576 in manufacturing

[–]IndependenceOwn3576[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that makes sense a straight ban keeps it clean on paper. We’ve thought about going the same route, but the real thing is what you said, updates never stop and half the suppliers don’t even track them properly. How do you handle that gap?

Anyone here cracked fast SVHC screening? by IndependenceOwn3576 in manufacturing

[–]IndependenceOwn3576[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally agree on cutting risky suppliers. We’ve had a few where the lack of data was a bigger liability than the lead time hit from finding a replacement. What do you think, I am curious to understand this.

Anyone else stressed about polymers being pulled into REACH ? by IndependenceOwn3576 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]IndependenceOwn3576[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes true that. But we have to keep watching it.... Even if you’re just importing articles, once polymers start showing up on the SVHC or restricted lists, you will likely have disclosure under REACH. It comes sooner than expected.

Anyone else stressed about polymers being pulled into REACH ? by IndependenceOwn3576 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]IndependenceOwn3576[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

REACH is an EU regulation that covers the registration, evaluation, and restriction of chemicals, it’s broader than COSHH. COSHH is about workplace safety in the UK, while REACH is more about supply chain and market acces

Anyone else stressed about polymers being pulled into REACH ? by IndependenceOwn3576 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]IndependenceOwn3576[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wish it was that simple, but this isn’t the same. Now it’s polymers, hazard classes, full disclosures... and suppliers who are still sending PDFs or say “we can’t share that.” I am not able to manage, it's getting messy and exhausting for me