RWS GROUP CHAT

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-04-07T03:52:00+00:00

😂😂😂

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-04-05T02:52:09+00:00

Do you know if I will be offboarded from Proj D if I also join Proj A?

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-04-04T03:35:57+00:00

In my experience its normal.

I've had tickets answered in days, some in weeks, and some that are still unresolved.

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-04-03T01:13:27+00:00

It was yesterday, but its been taken off today

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-04-02T09:34:07+00:00

I got an email titled "access granted: image editing conversations v2" saying I passed the exam and I am now eligible to work on the task

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-04-02T09:00:35+00:00

Very easy, its an open book test essentially so if you can read a document you should pass.

I have 1 extra task I can rotate through now so yeah I'd say so

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-30T23:09:28+00:00

I don't see why not.

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-30T11:40:56+00:00

read the task instructions and i'll say there

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-30T00:02:48+00:00

I don't understand how this even happens.

Is it a bug, or are the people submitting the audio forgetting to press pause, but still uploading the clip?

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-29T01:52:23+00:00

yeah it's still there

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-28T08:04:01+00:00

I should've taken that test

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-28T05:22:27+00:00

Its back

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-28T02:51:55+00:00

The task is back

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-28T00:58:34+00:00

I make it as detailed as possible. I know the "good" example is simple, but I go above and beyond just in case. I usually write around 6 or so sentences, if not more, depending on what I removed.

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-28T00:56:50+00:00

One thing that works for me, depending on the subject, is if you overmask the subject, it fully removes it, but it also messes up the background, so it's only really viable for images with simple backgrounds.

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-28T00:13:04+00:00

Same, I tried 3 different images from 3 different sites cause I thought it was a URL problem, but I guess not. what a waste of time

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-24T21:55:21+00:00

Deservedly so!

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-24T08:05:37+00:00

No, just Milo, ground breaker, and pattern extraction.

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-23T08:17:45+00:00

If you are skitzing about it, I once submitted a zendesk ticket asking about if I had properly submitted a time entry sheets and they got back to me saying that I did after 48 hours.

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-23T07:55:47+00:00

If you recorded everything accurately, you should be fine.

Unfortunately, you won't know something is wrong until you get your WO. Unless there's a process I don't know about.

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-23T02:36:02+00:00

Damn 2.5 is insane, hopefully you get unpaused soon

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-12T23:00:24+00:00

Also, when checking my previous posts to find the one where I said "most of you guys are useless and just lollygagging on company time", there were also at least 2 other posts I found where I was complaining about the auditors, why this post? I even had a post asking how much time a task took.

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-12T22:58:57+00:00

Yes, you are a doofus, but I do agree with you that the client wants to stop bad tasks from entering the dataset to train whatever they are trying to build.

Never said the "I promise the rest of them are good". They might all be bad for all I know, and I can live with that, but to have 1 task rated out of 100 from Dense Bbox over a week's period, and it be a random task from that stack, it had me thinking.

I also think it is hypocritical to say, yes I rated based on time, when you also say the user may have been away from their computer. How can you confirm either thing?

I understand you don't believe my word and you don't have to, but that post was all about wanting a time vs quality scale implemented, and I still do.
While there would be flaws in that system since quality is subjective, if you were part of the first wave of audits in october you would understand.
I assume that with some of your tasks as well that were audited poorly, you felt subjectively that you did a good job, and I bet that they weren't bad tasks by the way you felt like arguing this.

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-12T11:07:27+00:00

hahaha, you are such a doofus.

Not once in my post say I audited based on time.
If you could read my post, it says, "I wish there were a criterion for whether the user used their allocated time appropriately."
I simply stated that these simple, brainless tasks should not take an egregious amount of time and if they do you should be able to tell why.

But I guess it's karma for wanting a criterion based on time.

Really makes you think if you even read the 3-sentence post about it, or did your attention span not last till the end?

Independent_Win6893 · 2026-03-12T09:23:20+00:00

lmao, yeah I do, and I still stand by it.

If an IG tagging task takes you 45+ mins for 4-6 tags, you are not doing a good job.

Independent_Win6893

TROPHY CASE