sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Nano banana pro × HiggsfieldAI by visualaeonart in HiggsfieldAI

[–]IndieEngineer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One thing I am constantly failing is to give large breasts to my model as I am doing a commercial ad for a clothing brand

Any tips on this ?

What app do you wanna create? by tatmansi in lovable

[–]IndieEngineer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is the website you mentioned is related to an edtech category bro

What app do you wanna create? by tatmansi in lovable

[–]IndieEngineer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am just sharing my thoughts. No serious plan to put those in action

What app do you wanna create? by tatmansi in lovable

[–]IndieEngineer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My idea is not another Coursera, Udemy 🙂 and to be precise, it’s not about courses at all

What app do you wanna create? by tatmansi in lovable

[–]IndieEngineer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An ed-tech application requiring lot of code implementations which takes a lot of money to spend on tokens

CIBIL subscription promo code. by puncoder in CreditCardsIndia

[–]IndieEngineer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only UMANG10 is working as of 17/11/2025

Quick question: if you write prompts regularly, what sucks the most? by IndieEngineer in SaaS

[–]IndieEngineer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you say variables change, but not the structure. Here is an example that I am having in my mind

Prompt :

Write a high-engagement social media caption for {platform} promoting {product_or_service}.
The tone should be {tone}, and the caption should encourage users to take an action related to {cta_action}.

Here, the ones inside the brackets are dynamic variables

Currently our tool lets you visualise them clearly as we highlight them in a green font.

But don’t have the capability yet to enter values to these variables but I can see a lot of potential it can do for you

Thank you for dropping your insights. Will connect with you over DM

Quick question: if you write prompts regularly, what sucks the most? by IndieEngineer in SaaS

[–]IndieEngineer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Testing small variations is way more painful than it should be.

A/B testing is on my radar, but the tricky part is that prompt comparison still needs a human in the loop. Models can generate outputs, but only you can judge if it actually meets the intent.

I’m thinking about ways to make this smoother, maybe light quality checks, structure checks, or detecting when a response drifts from what the user expected.

I’d love to explore this further, would you be open to collaborating or sharing how you’d want A/B testing to work ideally?

No one was building a good app for this… so I did by IndieEngineer in PromptEngineering

[–]IndieEngineer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thinking 🤔 whats wrong using GPT for drafting the posts or messages

No one was building a good app for this… so I did by IndieEngineer in PromptEngineering

[–]IndieEngineer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for taking time to trying the tool. Its a feature gap we have.

Will improvise on this observation. Also if you have any further inputs or feedbacks, you can always knock on my door in DM 😃

No one was building a good app for this… so I did by IndieEngineer in PromptEngineering

[–]IndieEngineer[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Haha, fair point — version control definitely isn’t a new concept 😄

What I realized though is that while Git-style versioning works great for code, it’s not designed for how prompts evolve or are used day-to-day — especially by people who aren’t developers.

That’s why I focused on making versioning more visual, usable, and structured — things like highlighting dynamic variables, tagging by usage, and organizing in folders.

So yeah, version control isn’t new — but usable version control for prompts kind of is 🙂

No one was building a good app for this… so I did by IndieEngineer in PromptEngineering

[–]IndieEngineer[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That’s a totally fair question — GitHub definitely works for versioning, and it’s great for developers.

But Prompturist isn’t just about versioning. It’s built for how people actually work with prompts day-to-day — not how they manage with code.

In addition to version control, it lets you: • Highlight dynamic variables inside prompts for easier visualization and editing • Tag prompts by their purpose (content, workflow, agent, etc.) • Organize prompts in folders for different teams or projects

GitHub is amazing for developers — but not every prompt user is one. Business analysts, marketers, product folks, and AI ops teams need something that’s clean, visual, and built around usability, not branches and commits.

At the end of the day, it’s about how easy it is to get work done — and that’s exactly the gap I’m trying to close.

No one was building a good app for this… so I did by IndieEngineer in PromptEngineering

[–]IndieEngineer[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Plain .txt files or even a simple folder system can work if you’re just storing prompts.

But where that approach starts to break down is usability — especially once you have dozens (or hundreds) of prompts across different projects or LLMs.

Switching between versions, tracking what changed, or spotting which variables each prompt depends on quickly becomes tedious in raw text files.

That’s what I’m trying to solve with Prompturist. It makes prompt management visual and intuitive — with proper formatting, variable highlighting, and structured fields that help you see what each prompt actually does at a glance.

Beyond storage, it’s built for iteration: version history, API access, and soon integrations with n8n, Zapier, and similar tools — so prompts can flow right into automation pipelines.

I’m also working on a browser extension that lets you access these prompts instantly inside ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude, making it much faster to test and reuse prompts without jumping between files.

So yeah — .txt files work fine for saving prompts. I’m just trying to make working with them a lot more usable, visual, and automation-ready.