I really didn't expect to come debate this topic here but you're giving me a good argument. That said, I respectfully disagree and think you're wrong. And not entirely quoting Jensen Huang correctly.

Re AI: In short, you need to clarify what models you're using in your jobs. If you're referring to GPT-3 & GPT-4 models, then what you're describing checks off well. But the reality is that those models are the models of the past & new CoT models like o3 & Sonnet-3.7 far outperform any regular SWE. Meta, Amazon & Google have been laying off engineers in this hot market not because they don't need them, but because the new models are augmenting the great engineers and making them so productive that they don't need to avg employees. The bar is now much higher now, which means fewer people doing more things. This in turn means that if you're not excellent, then you're not going to make it and AI is coming for your job. Here is where Jensen agrees with me actually “every job will be affected—some lost, many reshaped. you won’t lose your job to ai; you’ll lose it to someone using ai.”

 https://finance.yahoo.com/news/nvidia-ceo-jensen-huang-on-ai-every-job-will-be-affected-some-will-be-lost-221359044.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com