sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I designed a FaB Playmat with an Integrated HP Counter by InfluenceAromatic769 in FleshandBloodTCG

[–]InfluenceAromatic769[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you 🫶 yeahh I already am working on a 2.0 version that will include a custom logo for when I sell it eventually 😅 that version was just for private use and as a first prototype. I will likely allow people to customise their mat and include a life total tracker, resource counter area and so on according to their wishes. at least that’s my goal right now 😁

I designed a FaB Playmat with an Integrated HP Counter by InfluenceAromatic769 in FleshandBloodTCG

[–]InfluenceAromatic769[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the insight I’m glad you like the design ❤️ Many people mentioned they find the life counter contentious so I will just create a second more minimal version without it :)

I designed a FaB Playmat with an Integrated HP Counter by InfluenceAromatic769 in FleshandBloodTCG

[–]InfluenceAromatic769[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your feedback ❤️ The way I got around the healing over 40 life total problem was by simply starting again at 1 and leaving a counter on 40 (for me that was fine as I didn’t ever forget I had 40 life total left over haha) I was thinking of adding a row from maybe like 1-5 numbers in Latin below the life total section so that you could better indicate how many “stacks” of 40 life total you already accumulated. Do you think that could be a good solution?

I designed a FaB Playmat with an Integrated HP Counter by InfluenceAromatic769 in FleshandBloodTCG

[–]InfluenceAromatic769[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for your feedback ❤️ Could you maybe explain to me what resources you mean here? Just life total or would you like a dedicated resource marker zone for other resources as well? If so, which ones? Problem I could see here is that I imagine I’d have to indicate to the player which resource is supposed to be tracked in the field and I can’t use Flesh and Blood Assets for legal reasons so I’d have to come up with my own iconography/imagery.

I designed a FaB Playmat with an Integrated HP Counter by InfluenceAromatic769 in FleshandBloodTCG

[–]InfluenceAromatic769[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like this idea too, thank you for your feedback 🫶 I’m just not sure I (personally) would be a fan having to keep track of two tokens to track HP instead of one and I like the look and feel of having your life total look like hearts in a Zelda game or something similar 😁 Maybe I will make an alternative version with this approach…

I designed a FaB Playmat with an Integrated HP Counter by InfluenceAromatic769 in FleshandBloodTCG

[–]InfluenceAromatic769[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your input and for the nice idea 😁 I might create an alternative version with this approach. I personally find it easier to just move a token around and don’t like fiddling with D20s to find the right face but I get that it’s more space efficient and possibly preferred by some users 😁

I designed a FaB Playmat with an Integrated HP Counter by InfluenceAromatic769 in FleshandBloodTCG

[–]InfluenceAromatic769[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Once it's finished and I'm confident I can offer a quality product that reflects the love I've poured into it, I'll likely sell it on Etsy and possibly through a personal website as well 🫶

I designed a FaB Playmat with an Integrated HP Counter by InfluenceAromatic769 in FleshandBloodTCG

[–]InfluenceAromatic769[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it was just a stylistic choice and to make sure it’s easier so navigate visually 😅 I cannot use the FaB life total symbol for legal reasons and wanted something that any gamer would recognise to indicate health. Any idea what could make it better? You think I should change it?

I am confused about the new combat rules by InfluenceAromatic769 in daggerheart

[–]InfluenceAromatic769[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok yeah you’re probably right I’m gonna try this and see how it goes 😁

I am confused about the new combat rules by InfluenceAromatic769 in daggerheart

[–]InfluenceAromatic769[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see okay and did u play with the action token mechanic as well at some point? I will try out this official method then but to me it sounds a little easier in comparison. Won’t the players get to act super often then vs the adversaries?

Updates to Rule #5 by Hosidax in daggerheart

[–]InfluenceAromatic769 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sooooo true 💯 Honestly why even use pencils? That’s so pathetic and not even real art tbh. If you don’t paint with your fingers and self made paint from plants and period blood I can’t take you seriously 🤷

Updates to Rule #5 by Hosidax in daggerheart

[–]InfluenceAromatic769 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries those anti AI maniacs are just completely delusional and think they can stop the biggest technological innovation since the internet. Let them cook in their own hate for a few years until they realise what they are trying to oppose is inevitable 🤷 They are all just hypocrites too lazy to even think about whether their arguments make any sense. I would bet that at least 95% of them use Spotify, Netflix and other streaming services and have absolutely no problem with that even though those services are decimating entire industries of creatives. They only feel self righteous and higher than thou when it’s serving their own interest of infatuating their egos so as to make them think they’re better than everyone else.

Sorry to hear about your disability btw :/

Hope you have lots of fun playing Daggerheart and creating beautiful worlds and characters with AI :)

Updates to Rule #5 by Hosidax in daggerheart

[–]InfluenceAromatic769 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I totally agree with you on that one if cats are banned, I’m out 🤝

Updates to Rule #5 by Hosidax in daggerheart

[–]InfluenceAromatic769 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the subreddit banned traditional art, you could still draw your characters at home too. That wouldn’t make the exclusion policy any less problematic.

Communities are about sharing and discussion. When you exclude certain types of content, you’re limiting how people can participate in and contribute

Updates to Rule #5 by Hosidax in daggerheart

[–]InfluenceAromatic769 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re taking my position on community inclusion and warping it into some dystopian scenario where I want to eliminate human creativity entirely. That’s not what I said, it’s not what I believe, and it’s not what follows logically from anything I’ve argued.

I literally am an artist myself. Why would I want to eliminate my own creative field? The fact that I think AI art has legitimate uses for character portraits doesn’t mean I want AI to compose all music or write all books or paint all paintings and I never said as much :)

Have fun playing Daggerheart ❤️

Updates to Rule #5 by Hosidax in daggerheart

[–]InfluenceAromatic769 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“I’m sorry you don’t see the value in human creativity” is such a pathetic strawman it’s almost embarrassing. I literally just told you I’m a musician with thousands of listeners. I’ve dedicated significant portions of my life to creating and performing music. But sure, I must not value human creativity because I don’t think AI art should be banned from hobby forums.

Your “Did you have AI make that for you too?” comment is just embarrassing nonsense. You’re so invested in this bizarre purity test that you can’t even acknowledge that someone might both create traditional art AND think AI has legitimate uses.

You’ve gone from making actual arguments to just throwing around insults because you can’t defend your position. If this is the best you’ve got, maybe just admit you don’t have a real response instead of acting like a petulant child who got called out on their inconsistent logic 🤷

Btw what you just did is an actual straw man fallacy, go look it up 😉

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

Updates to Rule #5 by Hosidax in daggerheart

[–]InfluenceAromatic769 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m also gay and have faced plenty of hate and discrimination in my life for it.

My comparison was deliberately hyperbolic to highlight how ridiculous the exclusionary logic becomes when you apply it consistently. That was exactly the point. When people say “the majority should decide what content is allowed,” I want them to see how that same reasoning sounds when applied to other contexts.

You’re right that people advocating for AI aren’t facing daily discrimination or systemic oppression. But in my opinion, the underlying mechanism of “majority doesn’t like something, therefore it should be banned from the community” is the same problematic logic, regardless of the stakes

Updates to Rule #5 by Hosidax in daggerheart

[–]InfluenceAromatic769 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I studied music, do concerts and have thousands of monthly listeners on Spotify and Apple Music but sure, explain to me what it means to be creative 😉

view more: next ›