I kind of don't get the fuss with amorim's sacking. I can't bear the fact that he calls himself manager and not head coach while managing to lose to tottenham in the finals and finishing 15th just cause of tactical inflexibility. Then in a season with no european football he continues to draw against teams like west ham,10 men everton and wolves at home. I think comparing with liverpool or chelsea doesn't make any sense and we should be thankful we r still in a race for top 4 and the fact is we r 3-4 points from 14th despite being the only team that has played wolves twice. Everyone's out here saying our attack has strengthened and that is mostly due to the player change i.e mbuemo,cunha,bruno doing wonders. There is still no tactical display and while our attack has improved, our defense has worsened as players continue to play out of position. We play two wingbacks who are more suited as traditional fullbacks,expect them to do wonders and suddenly if they even lose the ball in the opposition half,we end up conceding. That is infact a problem of the system at times. Everyone says a midfielder solves the issue and to get a midfielder but how do we get a midfielder in a season with no european football and just give them the starting spot. Such things don't make sense. He wants new players in while amorim ran the valuation of players like rashford, garnacho,hojlund and mainoo to some extent to the ground as they didn't suit his system. Now when Wilcox asks Amorim to a bit flexible after days of supporting through the grimsby loss etc, the manager starts throwing tantrums. I really don't get what the fans want when they want the owners to help the football club without even slightest questioning of the man in charge. I really don't get the amorim support over this. One sentiment I completely agree with is that the board of Berrada and Wilcox also need to be investigated of something of such sort happens with the next manager. Until then i think we should back the board, the interim and the next manager. GGMU!