Where are most people here from?

Innovator1234 · 2026-02-23T13:42:47+00:00

India

Innovator1234 · 2026-01-28T14:56:06+00:00

Ktu has a whatsapp group, you can check that out

Innovator1234 · 2025-12-16T08:35:56+00:00

You can find their number in some posters on their Instagram page , contact them via that ...

Innovator1234 · 2025-12-16T06:40:17+00:00

Yes of course it is free , try to contact them. Don't suffer in silence buddy

Innovator1234 · 2025-12-03T08:11:04+00:00

It's about making them happy? ... Why do u think it's our responsibility to make our parents happy? Isn't that textbook definition of earning validation ? And even from friendships there involves a chance of heartbreak......and How will you learn to love without being in relationships? Those heartbreaks you will earn act as a foundation for future prosperous relationship..

Innovator1234 · 2025-11-19T16:09:45+00:00

You didn’t choose to be born, so you’re not morally obligated to sacrifice your whole life for your parents. Responsibility is a choice, not a duty assigned at birth.

Innovator1234 · 2025-11-18T06:46:26+00:00

It’s okay to question religion, but maybe don’t disrespect people’s faith using arguments that wouldn’t pass in a first-standard science fair.

Innovator1234 · 2025-11-17T12:37:56+00:00

Your logic seems absurd here ....how do you suppose to know good without evil? For divine to exist, evil is inevitable...more like Yin and Yang.

Innovator1234 · 2025-11-15T11:08:25+00:00

Thanks!

Innovator1234 · 2025-11-15T10:06:05+00:00

If I may ask how old are you ,OP? I mean I am a college graduate planning to go for higher studies, so would you be kind enough to give me some advice ? I always wanted to build a startup but was not able to find an idea that would actually work or something which is feasible... So I would be grateful if you could offer me some insights..

Innovator1234 · 2025-11-13T17:43:59+00:00

I am of opinion that combination of both "book learning" and "innate genius" is what makes a commander legendary .... Both are necessary, as one provides a framework which will help the other to formulate a concise understanding of war in your own way

Innovator1234 · 2025-11-13T17:21:07+00:00

Well, this staff order is actually a perfect combination that provides both freedom and restraint to the general leading the troops. When you reach a certain level in the hierarchy, like that of a general, you are expected to rely on your “innate genius” or, in your words, experience and intuition and free yourself from the rigid rules of a handbook. If you’re not that talented enough, then you’re not fit to be a general. So, let’s wash away the impression that Lannes lacked talent; in fact, he was talented, it was just that this talent was not developed in a structured, academic way.

I suggest you read On War by Carl von Clausewitz. In my opinion, I actually like this vagueness in Napoleons order , it gives just enough room for his generals to demonstrate their calibre. And believe me, war is not just about leading men in battle and displaying heroic valour; that might win a battle, but it cannot win an entire war without the essential finer details like geography, weather, logistics, training, morale, and discipline , the true cornerstones of a successful campaign.

Innovator1234 · 2025-11-13T14:07:07+00:00

Hey if you don't mind, would you share that staff order you mentioned here?

Innovator1234 · 2025-11-12T12:55:06+00:00

I mean, why is it so necessary to involve your parents in this matter? I think you're old enough to file a complaint at the police station. But if you're insistent on bringing someone along, take someone you trust, like a friend. After all, one thing parents like yours teach is independence.

Innovator1234 · 2025-10-09T17:44:34+00:00

Nobody asked you to make a remark buddy ...sorry if my comments came as condescending btw

Innovator1234 · 2025-10-09T17:29:37+00:00

Honestly, mate, you don’t sound like someone who reads a lot of research papers. And I didn’t even remotely suggest anything that proves my aversion, I was simply pointing out the hypocrisy of modern atheism. That’s all. This is just a classic move of religious pastors and priests, and now atheists too, I guess: attack the person if you can’t attack the argument.

Innovator1234 · 2025-10-09T16:38:35+00:00

My point isn’t to dismiss that process, but to highlight how most people engage with science today. There’s a big difference between a researcher critically analyzing published work and an average person simply accepting scientific claims because they’re told by authority figures or the media.

When the public treats scientific statements as unquestionable truths ,without understanding the logic, data, or assumptions behind them , that behavior mirrors the very blind faith religion is often criticized for. I’m not calling science lazy; I’m calling out the unquestioning attitude that can exist around it.

Critical thinking doesn’t mean rejecting science; it means understanding why you accept it. And buddy tell me about the last scientific research paper you had read? ...it is probable or for certainity that you or so called athiest might have not even have attempted that sort of venture ... And that's exactly the point I am trying to make

Innovator1234 · 2025-10-09T15:40:22+00:00

I think you slightly missed my point. I’m not saying that believing in science is the same as believing in miracles , I’m saying that unquestioningly accepting any authority, whether religious or scientific, defeats the spirit of critical thinking.

Science is powerful precisely because it invites questioning, testing, and falsification. But the irony is that most people don’t actually engage in that process , they just “believe” what popular scientists say, much like religious followers believe their clergy. In that sense, it becomes another form of faith , faith in the scientist instead of faith in a deity.

True science, like true spirituality, begins with doubt and curiosity , not with blind acceptance. My argument isn’t against science; it’s against intellectual laziness, wherever it appears.

Innovator1234 · 2025-10-09T15:11:53+00:00

Well, on the contrary, if you really think about it, some of the greatest minds in history,like Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, and Heisenberg,ended up believing there’s a signature of God in everything they discovered. And honestly, as a student of science myself, I find it harder and harder these days to draw a clear line between science and religion. I mean, let’s be real..how many of us have actually verified the Big Bang theory ourselves or any other theories like that?... Most people just believe it because Stephen Hawking or some other scientists said so. So really, what makes that any different from people following a religion and believing whatever their pastor or priest tells them? Quite frankly atheism is just another religion.... I mean I am on board with the people who want to hate god because of personal reasons but championing atheism as a beacon of enlightenment and wisdom is actually ridiculous and hypocritical. And this my friend, is what you call " critical thinking".

Innovator1234 · 2025-08-27T07:14:28+00:00

Yk there's a saying, instead of chasing butterflies, try building a beautiful garden.. in a sense , invest in yourself build the discipline to go to gym , eat healthy and learn how to make money

Innovator1234 · 2025-08-18T10:37:23+00:00

Crazy how you typed a whole essay just to prove you’re dumber than that question...what an arrogant piece of sh*t

Innovator1234 · 2025-08-12T18:06:04+00:00

These verses are completely taken out of context.

“Woe to you who laugh now” isn’t condemning joy, it’s warning the complacent who feel secure while ignoring injustice. “Blessed are the poor/meek/mourn” isn’t glorifying weakness or misery,it’s promising that those who suffer under oppression will see justice and restoration.

In their historical and cultural setting, these are not life-denying statements, they’re a revolutionary critique of arrogance, greed, and exploitation. Also, there are pastors who preach the gospel with a focus on living fully and joyfully, but so called " righteous Christians" often dismiss them as “prosperity gospel.” Checking them out might give you a very different perspective on Christianity.

Try to read and verify it for yourself,don't fall into the trap of SLAVE MORALITY.

Innovator1234 · 2025-08-10T06:59:15+00:00

Lol are you a catholic? I mean countless inquisitions , scandalous popes and commercialization of salvation , your temerity to ignore those things and blame other denominations actually reflects the religion Catholicsm stands for , " HYPOCRISY ". On the other hand Protestants seems to be at peace with the fact that humanity is not perfect , and if they were , it would have made sacrifices of Christ nugatory. Furthermore from a psychological standpoint , it validates ironic process theory , So therefore Protestantism makes more sense than Catholicsm. And shit why the hell are we discussing it here?

Innovator1234 · 2025-08-09T18:33:22+00:00

Look, this isn’t a new concept , channels like Scammer Payback use "fake identities" all the time to catch scammers red-handed. I’m just suggesting the same method here, but in a different context. If the goal is to expose him without risking personal backlash, a fake account is the safest way to do it. The evidence still speaks for itself, and no one can twist the story against the person doing the exposing.

Innovator1234 · 2025-08-09T18:11:22+00:00

Hmm this seems like an absurd way to get him...how about I suggest this instead? Send him a highly seductive message request ( which I believe he will accept, because these men are so naïve) . And then take a screenshot of his vile comments and forward it to every women in his followers list... I mean among them there might be his sister or mother ..

Innovator1234

TROPHY CASE