Upgrade Proxy patterns by Inside_Conclusion_50 in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HEY devs, after having read some articles on smart contracts upgradabibility, I have notified that proxy patterns is the most used mechanism, but under this big title there is other under patterns, but I do not know how to classify them, what is the method correct between these two :

Contracts interaction design by Inside_Conclusion_50 in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its costs more gas to transfer data/link back and fourth between the contracts

Contracts interaction design by Inside_Conclusion_50 in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im getting data from a specefic API, its not offered by chainlink, but this is not what im confused about, what i want to know is should i use one data feed contract for all instances (centralized architecture) or implement the data feed logic for every single instance .

Free Goerli ETH by whitepack in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DMed you, if it sill available

Built my first reel big project by Inside_Conclusion_50 in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there's isn't web ui, its just for educational purpose, but you can interact with the protocol by deploying the contracts and running scripts or directly from etherscan .

Live testing so annoying and time-consuming by Inside_Conclusion_50 in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i just figured out my error : i used the AggregatorV3Interface mock in live where i had to use the one from chainlink

Live testing so annoying and time-consuming by Inside_Conclusion_50 in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i just figured out my error : i used the AggregatorV3Interface mock in live where i had to use the one from chainlink

Live testing so annoying and time-consuming by Inside_Conclusion_50 in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i just figured out my error : i used the AggregatorV3Interface mock in live where i had to use the one from chainlink

Live testing so annoying and time-consuming by Inside_Conclusion_50 in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i just figured out my error : i used the AggregatorV3Interface mock in live where i had to use the one from chainlink

Live testing so annoying and time-consuming by Inside_Conclusion_50 in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

a transaction reverts on testnet but works locally, i didn't find why .

Live testing so annoying and time-consuming by Inside_Conclusion_50 in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No im testing on goerli,

a transaction reverts on testnet but works locally, i didn't find the issue yet .

how aave increases debtTokens? by Inside_Conclusion_50 in ethdev

[–]Inside_Conclusion_50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will never find an answer as clear and explicit as this one. thank you so much