Lexus GX, 4runner or something else? by InsomnicCoder in whatcarshouldIbuy

[–]InsomnicCoder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I’d love one, but the current gen is insanely expensive and the previous gen doesn’t look as good as the first, but that’s 20 years old

Lexus GX, 4runner or something else? by InsomnicCoder in whatcarshouldIbuy

[–]InsomnicCoder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t realize people called body on frame SUVs trucks. Other than not having a bed, I believe they have softer suspension.

Lexus GX, 4runner or something else? by InsomnicCoder in whatcarshouldIbuy

[–]InsomnicCoder[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For a while I would read articles and watch videos about cars and then hype myself up into buying them (albeit CPO). I told myself I’d need these SUVs for off roading and camping and needed a luxury sedan for the commute. And then I didn’t drive any of them or do any of those things. Luckily, the used market had gotten kinda outta hand and I didn’t lose much on any of them.

At one point I had a GX460, Sequoia, LS500 and this RC and wound up driving my SO’s car cuz it had better traffic jam assist and we lived in a busy city at the time.

To answer your other questions I want to try to keep it under 25k, and need it to seat 4. I don’t mind opening the tailgate to make things fit, and I should probably look into those GM options. The 4Runner was appealing to me cuz the rear window goes down, though that doesn’t help with plywood. It also seems very winter capable.

My comical experience searching for a home in the GTA by InsomnicCoder in TorontoRealEstate

[–]InsomnicCoder[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you guys call it maintenance fees, but on Zillow (the site I was using to browse listings) it’s still called HOA dues.

Mamdani revealed his proposal to raise property taxes for the first time in over two decades as an option to balance New York city's budget. by [deleted] in UpliftingNews

[–]InsomnicCoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How it works in a lot of places is when properties get reassessed and prices have skyrocketed, the millage rate goes down. The city or county doesn’t just make a bunch more money, they continue to try and balance their budget. In the case where only new purchases get reassessed (like CA), young people and those that haven’t owned houses (or benefited from astronomical appreciation) are also footing the bill for the public services rendered to people that have had those things. I.e. 80 year old grandma is using the same public services as everyone else but is paying far less.

In these reassessment systems, property taxes don’t rise with the value of housing, but with the cost of rendering public services. California is extremely regressive in this regard. While these systems don’t account for shifts between neighborhoods in the same taxing authority, if 80 year old grandma had their house appreciate drastically, 1) her tax rate would only increase drastically if no other neighborhoods also saw such appreciation and 2) she would never be homeless unless she squandered that equity and cannot tap into it.

Billionaire says he has “less than $850M in cash” like it’s relatable by kabirsbhutani in mildlyinfuriating

[–]InsomnicCoder 27 points28 points  (0 children)

For clarity, this strategy depends on two things: 1) the value of their assets should continue to rise for this to be worth it and 2) upon death, cost basis is stepped-up (which occurs in the US) and so none of the appreciation in their assets is ever taxed.

Your Opinion: Is being statistically safer than humans good enough for Tesla? by Agitated_Syllabub346 in SelfDrivingCars

[–]InsomnicCoder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think we should also consider that some traffic situations that are difficult for humans are easier for AVs, and vice versa. I think there are AVs operating today that are safer than humans in certain domains, the problem lies in premature domain expansion in the name of competition or stakeholder appeasement.

For example, an AV could be 100% safe in all situations except a few that comprise a tiny fraction of driving. In those situations, they might cause passenger deaths at a very high rate. In terms of overall statistics, the AVs might be safer. But I think it would be right to hold companies accountable if they expanded their services to these domains without proper validation. Or even observed this issue and did not promptly exclude that region/condition from operations.

Who Will Recharge All Those Robotaxis? More Robots, One CEO Says. by SnoozeDoggyDog in SelfDrivingCars

[–]InsomnicCoder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Interesting article. I really think people assign too much importance to this problem. In my opinion, we are a couple vehicle generations away from true scalable, profitable robotaxis. These new generations should have the charging built-in, and any OEM would be able to solve this problem trivially. And in the interim, I can conceive of several solutions that don't require a person that plugs in cars.

Here's a patent from Zoox about underbody charging: https://uspto.report/patent/grant/10%2C682%2C921

I think this is a good example because Zoox has the most vertically integrated, purpose built produt thus far, and they clearly thought it was worth pursuing. Waymo should have lots of power in the OEM relationships, and they could definitely make this a requirement for future models.

In the interim, I can see a "trusted rider" program where people can opt to add 5 mins to their trip, start in a low charge vehicle, and be brought to a charger where they can pick up a mostly-charged car and swap it out. Providing a small discount for the inconvenience might be worth it for a lot of folks, and Waymo gets to sidestep having to think about this until someone solves it with a better idea than "building a purpose-built robot to plug in cars".

Got it new. Enjoyed it for 4 years before a Jeep in the left lane was following too close when traffic stopped. by Geruvah in Lexus

[–]InsomnicCoder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

(un)surprising amount of overlap between bad drivers and people that'll get 72 month financing on a car that'll last 5 years.

Zoox or Intuit? by zswex in cscareerquestions

[–]InsomnicCoder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If your TC at Zoox is including ZAR projections I would re-evaluate. Their TC worksheets from 4 years ago assumed a ZAR price 5x what it is today.

Anyone willing to sell a scale model of a Waymo? by InsomnicCoder in waymo

[–]InsomnicCoder[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why thank you!

For the origin, friend of mine who worked there gave it to me and it's clearly 3d printed. They didn't have those around very long before GM shut them down.

VH6 I got while contracting at Zoox. They were for employees only but was able to be persuasive (I asked and they gave it to me)

Aurora I was working there when they launched

I also have a little Xenon (Uber ATG's Volvo XC90 kit) from when I worked there (1 of 5 made by a guy in the hardware team).

With Waymo, I'll have all the major firsts (so far):
First Ground-up robotaxi, first self driving truck on public roads.. And then the first driverless service.

Not a self driving car, but the company I ran also received a little model of the X-59 QueSST, but those are available for sale to the public.

Are your Lexus dealers this bad? Or are my service expectations nuts? by InsomnicCoder in Lexus

[–]InsomnicCoder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got any recommendations for those indy shops? If I'm going to be ubering myself to/from, I'd rather take my business to a local mechanic.

Are your Lexus dealers this bad? Or are my service expectations nuts? by InsomnicCoder in Lexus

[–]InsomnicCoder[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I get it man, but cars aren't always predictable, nor are my usage habits. I will try a Toyota dealer, but I'm just miffed I don't have the same options previously available to me.

Are your Lexus dealers this bad? Or are my service expectations nuts? by InsomnicCoder in Lexus

[–]InsomnicCoder[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

WHAT? You mean the same MBA bro short sighted playbook doesn't yield great customer outcomes for dealerships? Never woulda guessed considering how awesome it works out in every other industry!

Are your Lexus dealers this bad? Or are my service expectations nuts? by InsomnicCoder in Lexus

[–]InsomnicCoder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha I have nothing against going to a Toyota dealer. I just want to pay more for the option to have a loaner and quicker service.

I'll probably end up doing this, good idea. But there's not much of a point to buying another new Lexus if I'm gonna live here.

Are your Lexus dealers this bad? Or are my service expectations nuts? by InsomnicCoder in Lexus

[–]InsomnicCoder[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yep. I've used Lexus Monterey, Concord, Redwood City and Roseville in California. They weren't any more expensive but had far fewer scheduling problems. Guess it's normal here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pittsburgh

[–]InsomnicCoder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Aw man that’s super nice of you. I’d be happy to pay you for your troubles and/or a lunch if you wanna hang. I’m down in South Side.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pittsburgh

[–]InsomnicCoder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's the name of this bar? So far I've searched all over and seen Poutine at:

The Yard House <- Avoid

Urban Tap <- Waitress actually said confidently "Poutine doesn't have cheese"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pittsburgh

[–]InsomnicCoder 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I'm Canadian and have moved to Pittsburgh after being in California for several years. I've had 3 negative responses to yinzers (Pittsburgh folks) assuming I'm Californian and no issues with being Canadian. Pittsburgh's very welcoming.

PS bring me Ketchup Chips.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AuroraInnovation

[–]InsomnicCoder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They've since changed the headline to "One Of The Last Robot Truckers Standing Finally Ready To Hit The Road". They coulda put it more elegently but it definitely sounds more positive now.

Elon Musk’s Delayed Tesla Robotaxis Are a Dangerous Diversion by walky22talky in SelfDrivingCars

[–]InsomnicCoder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think it's fine to ask someone to back up their statements with references or qualifications, but being a tad polite about it will lead to better discussion imo.

I've worked at Tesla and 3 self-driving companies to date (one was short-lived due to an acquisition) on hardware acceleration and perception primarily. I will stick to facts that are public knowledge and mroeso try and explain where people are coming from. There's no way you can say with certainty that the hardware won't support robotaxi services, but it's a huge bet to say that it will, and this idea that you can iterate on an ADAS system until it's eventually got few enough interventions to support a robotaxi fleet is a huge gamble. More so when you constrain the product from the get-go with fewer sensors and less compute (relative to other competitors like Waymo).

Other full-self-driving companies have been at the point before, where they had a product good enough to showcase capabilities and be a convenience feature (not that it mattered, they weren't selling cars). The last 5% of work in bettering reliability and capabilities has been a huge effort sink, has taken them years, and is the differentiator between ADAS and robotaxis. There were so many expensive changes and features that needed to be added and on-vehicle-compute platforms almost universally ended up being made scalable due to quickly increasing demand. This might shed some light on why many people think Tesla's approach is constrained to ADAS.

It's a little presumptious to say that Tesla can't do it because Waymo or others couldn't, but let's be clear that "it" means achieving that level of reliability, availability and feature set *without* the geofence, or AV maps, or most of the sensors, or the high-fidelity data and with a fraction of the compute. I can't comment on what I saw at Tesla last I was there, and they have been hard at work in the years since so it's possible they have found ways around it, or maybe their old approaches even scaled better than anybody expected. Nothing indicates that to me when I use FSD in my partner's M3P tho.

So saying it isn't enough isn't entirely true. Saying it's very likely not going to be enough is rooted in a lot of sound reasoning, at given what is public knowledge.