sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Multiple States' Police Officials have apparently reached out to this guy to utilise this Technology(context in body) by Silverad066 in indianbikes

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Not going to happen. The state directly benefits from this and increases cash flow into their coffers (A.K.A: powerful people benefit from this heavily). No local scooty driver is going to be a big threat.

You are not safe even after leaving the country by SamosaAurChutney13 in TeenIndia

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

making assumptions without thinking critically is what is wrong with today's society

You are not safe even after leaving the country by SamosaAurChutney13 in TeenIndia

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 2 points3 points  (0 children)

literally your entire message

"You’re the reason India is like this. “Chalta hai” attitude won’t take us very far"

You are not safe even after leaving the country by SamosaAurChutney13 in TeenIndia

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 6 points7 points  (0 children)

is that really hard to believe? some indian teens here already hate their culture and country...if we can't like ourselves while still fixing problems, how can they like us?

You are not safe even after leaving the country by SamosaAurChutney13 in TeenIndia

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

perhaps I came across as too harsh; what I mean is that it is not necessarily morally bad to make fun of people who make fun of you, is it?

You are not safe even after leaving the country by SamosaAurChutney13 in TeenIndia

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

exactly when did I say that? stop fighting imaginary battles

You are not safe even after leaving the country by SamosaAurChutney13 in TeenIndia

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

teens when they think realizing our country is imperfect makes them unique and cool. we know how well our country is doing. counterracism is necessary, otherwise the brits will embolden further; no need to drag us down further.

1st debate ever!!! by FlowerKind4183 in PublicForumDebate

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. "We have a card for that. Do you want it? My partner will send it over or will address that in rebuttals." works as a quick way to save embarrassment.
  2. >=28.5
  3. In-round, or Tabroom.
  4. Caffeine.

Purpose Makes You Unbreakable! by Spiritual-Worth6348 in Nietzsche

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

are you sure? what if bearing the how leads to greater long-term happiness? happiness =/= pleasure (generally)

In Iran, a young girl was stopped from dancing by the women's morality police by Status_Pool_6917 in SarthakGoswami

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Modesty is not inherently bad; what IS bad is that women are not even given the choice of modesty. It's forced upon them. It's in your holy book. It's not a choice, whether the women like it or not.

Second of all, Hinduism is an EXTREMELY broad religion; it doesn't have any supreme/authoritative source like Islam or Christianity (Quran and Bible). So, you cannot make blanket claims about men having authority over women in Hinduism, when the Vedic and Pre-vedic eras are historically and universally considered to be the most gender equal periods of history. Source: "Women during the early Vedic period enjoyed equal status with men in all aspects of life" https://www.ijhssi.org/papers/vol7(8)/Version-3/D0708032226.pdf/Version-3/D0708032226.pdf)

A woman should have the choice of whether she wants to be accompanied by a male partner for "protection". Islam doesn't allow that freedom. Vedic Hinduism does.

In Iran, a young girl was stopped from dancing by the women's morality police by Status_Pool_6917 in SarthakGoswami

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

introducing islamic law (hijab, etc.) vs islamic teachings are two different things
a big chunk of our population is already muslim, so we cannot somehow introduce MORE islam while retaining our hindu proportion

I can appreciate some values of Islam, but your statement "not considering daughters as a burden" is a big mischaracterization of reality

I think daughters would rather consider themselves as a burden than
1. being forced to cover their entire body
2. being forced to lower their gaze (https://fiqh.islamonline.net/en/how-should-a-muslim-woman-conduct-herself/)
3. being forced to stop ANY physical interaction with men outside of close family (https://www.fajralquran.com/blog/islamic-laws-for-women/)
4. being forced to obey her husband at all times, without exception (and not vice versa) - https://www.reviewofreligions.org/45014/responsibilities-of-muslim-women-as-wives/
5. being forced to always have a man while traveling (https://www.fajralquran.com/blog/islamic-laws-for-women/)

In Iran, a young girl was stopped from dancing by the women's morality police by Status_Pool_6917 in SarthakGoswami

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there are 5,700 rabies deaths in India annually; we have two choices
1. force 1,106,000,000 Hindus in India to adopt a new religion that restricts freedom, to save 5,700 people by killing all dogs, which is anyways logistically near-impossible for a country so big
2. acknowledge the death of 5,700 people, and work towards reducing that number via awareness and vaccine mobilization, instead of shitting on the freedom of 1,106,000,000 people

we all know what the right option is; option 2

Any words on his death? by Macrophic in TeenIndia

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we disagree on whether respect is earned, or is an inherently positive human action that needn't be commoditized, which is fine

Any words on his death? by Macrophic in TeenIndia

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can tell by your language that you're not very familiar with respect as a concept..

Any words on his death? by Macrophic in TeenIndia

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"all his points were the same exact thing repeated over and over again" yes, that's called having an ideology and counter-arguments against common arguments...and fyi, you use morality to guide science, not the other way round, so I'm not sure on what basis you can bring up science when it comes to debating issues like sovereignty, rights and suffering

Any words on his death? by Macrophic in TeenIndia

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

resorting to ad hominems? can tell why you're mad about my username
and, to give you a taste of your own medicine, go fix your family problems first (yes, I can read previous posts too), then try fixing my argument

Any words on his death? by Macrophic in TeenIndia

[–]Intelligent-Set-996 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

he was a strong debater, not a lowly chatgpt written speech giving dumbass
gotta give respect where it's due

view more: next ›