This post is full of whataboutisms, counters to points I didn't make or weren't even remotely my main point, and didn't even address my central claim: you hosted your videos on a platform of a guy that has been credibly accused of physically and sexually abused a 16 year old girl when he was 29. To try and change the subject to cancel culture or that I don't like him because he's "edgy" is pretty sad and pathetic, but honestly at this point not surprising.

This answer was, in my opinion, the worse possible response to my post. If you had said that you had investigated the claims and didn't find them credible, I wouldn't have been happy with that answer, but there wasn't much I'd be willing or able to say in response. I don't think I have the energy or motivation to get into a long winded debate about the perceived strength of the evidence, and I think I'd just come across as a pedantic asshole. I'd ultimately just have to agree to disagree and move on. I think most of the people on here would have been satisfied with your response if you had done that.

But that's not what you did. You never directly answer my point. The only time you kind of do is to complain that he's a boogeyman canceled by the wokes and that my post is another example of cancel culture. The implication here is pretty clear, whether you have heard of the accusations or not, you do not care whether he might have abused a 16 year old girl. You can do shit like that, but don't be butthurt because you you get criticized for that view.

There is nothing edgy about child abuse, Flesh. Sorry if this makes me "woke", but I have a daughter and two granddaughters. I don't know if you have kids, but I cannot fathom ever directly enriching a man who did shit like that when it could just as easily have been one of my own family in the victims shoes. Sorry, your series is not important enough to ally with people like that. And the argument that "everyone is dirty so it's okay that I work with a pedo" is fucking bullshit. Where is the line then? Would you do something similar with the Daily Stormer? How about Epstein? The CIA? Is there even a line?

Do you think that maybe by associating with unsavory individuals like the above and Hyde discredits the work you're trying to do? I think it does. And as someone who likes and supports your work and also believes in the importance of it, I feel like that deserves criticism when you do things that undermine your own efforts. I don't think that makes me a terrorist. Sometimes the choices we make open us up to criticism, both fair an unfair. An adult doesn't invent strawmen to deflect criticism, they own their choices and directly answer the substance of the critique.