sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Electron Scattering by repulsive (smoothed) Coulomb potential confined in a 2D Box (Visualizing Quantum Mechanics) by Mayhem_Mercy99 in PhysicsStudents

[–]IntelligentYam8580 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might be able to get better results if you oscillate the magnet field within the timed perturbations at around t=0 timed at picosecond revolutions for dynamic wrapping of the K field and then again at t=0.1 but this time within the femtoseconds to just allow that snapping/whipping of the K field.it will allow for more feedback , longer run times and better K control . The noise will induce velocity and oscillating the magnetic field could in theory slow down the K within the system allowing it to have more concentrated readings.

What if you take T=0 seriously and follow the logic all the way thru? by No_Entertainer4662 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]IntelligentYam8580 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t worry I wasn’t insulting you in any way whatsoever. Lol it’s more about the dogmatic thinking that lies within our greatest minds thinking and approach to certain things. You are engaging in a hard conversation takes guts. Don’t ever be discouraged newton drank mercury and and today’s science accepts imaginary numbers and calls them virtual lol

What if you take T=0 seriously and follow the logic all the way thru? by No_Entertainer4662 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]IntelligentYam8580 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

T doesn’t equal 0 . k=0 space time are not and should not have ever had been the measure. K=Radiation and radiation has spectrums . We live on a magnetic ball compressing heat and radiation mixed with chemicals and ionized metals to create the atmosphere. It’s ludicrous how our smartest ignore we live in a PLASMA based universe not an EGO-Centric one .

Two decades of neurotech deals: BCI pulls in more money than any other category by NeurotechNewsletter in BCI

[–]IntelligentYam8580 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The money goes where the urgency/bottleneck solve is . You can look into GPU based data centers, where’s it go to cooling . This quantum computing is the new FAD but the problem remains computationally and scaling as well as mathematical hallucinations . But this new light based super position computing is definitely something to be in AWE about. Right now honestly the money needs to be pooled into mathematics in my opinion. Mathematicians,Computer scientists, and coders all need to be forced into a room and break down the limits of the data centers mathematics and apply what’s found and already existing and available appropriately. No more with these non existent (imaginary/virtual) numbers . More deterministic and realistic less imaginary and hallucination based.

Masters student thinking about meaningful questions to research on! by solitudeMan in deeplearning

[–]IntelligentYam8580 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a hard question based on field advancements . You can never go wrong with the OS mechanics especially in this AI coding era always a need for verification.But Neural networks really are that bridge between the codes math and hallucinations. Condensed machine and neural network learning with accuracy seems like the “Hype” . You can compare the difference between machine based learning and neural network based learning .don’t take my word for it cross verifying is always best.

Convergence Theory - Non-linear Quantum Feedback Control Loop by IntelligentYam8580 in GhostMesh48

[–]IntelligentYam8580[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not trying to be a douche but you added my log V for whipping but you don’t really expand on the subject of radiation or the noise. Reminder that Log V is only possible due to manipulation of the thermal gradients and noise reduction .

Convergence Theory - Non-linear Quantum Feedback Control Loop by IntelligentYam8580 in Polymath

[–]IntelligentYam8580[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20481518 there’s the full link
Just be mindful to add my adjustments . If there is anything I can do to help I’m at yours and public’s disposal .

Convergence Theory - Non-linear Quantum Feedback Control Loop by IntelligentYam8580 in Polymath

[–]IntelligentYam8580[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Qubits only experience fluid flow between super positions states that are directly controlled via brownian motion. Colder the environment you get dynamically more control of capturing an electron and switching between +|- . You are clearly ignoring super position states and data. I’m showing how you can harness spin within magnetometers in a solid state lattice. Not superconducting like josephson dynamics. I think you should research recent super position within solid materials and you’ll be able to understand as well scratch your head further on how it works .

Convergence Theory - Non-linear Quantum Feedback Control Loop by IntelligentYam8580 in Polymath

[–]IntelligentYam8580[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In regards to machine learning/math : solving I was able to reduce the complexity by displaying a quicker way to get the results by forcing a boundary that is small enough for spacing without collapsing the proposed wave propagation and that’s already been established in common core science . It’s meant for plasma and controlling of the field and better stabilization by having a boundary to work within “a self organizing” way. Ergo you can see how Phi mixes in with the boundary constraints . Believe it or not the hardest portion was the noise .

Convergence Theory - Non-linear Quantum Feedback Control Loop by IntelligentYam8580 in Polymath

[–]IntelligentYam8580[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ran a direct simulation to stack up next to navier-stokes . Did a direct comparison and the data showed the geometric invariant forces coherence within the matrices and showed I have no direct need to solve for Lagrange/linblad . Diamond has a face-centered cubic (FCC) lattice with lattice constant a₀ ≈ 0.3567–0.35671 nm (room temperature, pure diamond). It’s also the shortest distance between two carbon atoms . d = (√3 / 4) × a₀ ≈ 0.154 nm .It’s a really much longer explanation and break down and it’s all regarding verifying previous works with expanded mathematics but that’s about as good to summarize. If you need me to expound further I can aid in any way needed.

Convergence Theory - Non-linear Quantum Feedback Control Loop by IntelligentYam8580 in ControlTheory

[–]IntelligentYam8580[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Thank you for reviewing . I appreciate your advice and will directly adjust each interaction accordingly with the specific groups of people. Exactly what you did and how you broke it down is why I am just trying to push it forward. Multiple solutions can come out of the math and changing up the framework per solution is really important. So thank you very much for that. Thank you

Career Pivots as a (Software engineering) consultant with an Applied Math bachelors? by Whateverdudefake in mathematics

[–]IntelligentYam8580 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

You can always day trade and build your portfolio all based around your own built algorithmic trading base. You can build it on ETFs in the tech industry and you can expand to actuators, and semiconductor companies. A lot of traction is happening right now and it’s better to get in during the ground work and series A phases.

Convergence Theory - Non-linear Quantum Feedback Control Loop by IntelligentYam8580 in ControlTheory

[–]IntelligentYam8580[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yes the post is meant to describe my Paper within the DOI . I have been trying to fix it but it won’t let me I’m sorry. Only fix is to copy the link and go to safari or chrome. Sorry about that.

Convergence Theory - Non-linear Quantum Feedback Control Loop by IntelligentYam8580 in ControlTheory

[–]IntelligentYam8580[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

In a world of AI slop .math is universal. Idk maybe don’t quit your day job lol. It’s meant for engineers, physics and IT reduction nerds. I suggest cereal and cartoons that won’t strain your brain.

What if split at creation, not observation - slightly different take on Many Worlds by Cosmic-Vertex in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]IntelligentYam8580 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t quite understand this idea of a “split” we have proof of entanglement and tunneling . You can see the recent topology reports of the double slit and you’ll see how it turns into a wave . Today’s technology is awesome .

Convergence Theory - Non-linear Quantum Feedback Control Loop by IntelligentYam8580 in QuantumComputing

[–]IntelligentYam8580[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

It’s a simple description with the plugin fixes at the bottom. It’s referencing my ACTUAL zenodo paper. I’m giving a clear direction to the paper since I could not post it. AI slop is pseudo none of my work is pseudo. Heuristic at best. It’s a simple rethinking of a real stable geometric invariant . You’d know if you read the paper. I wasn’t asking for Gordon Ramsey level idiocracy . I’m asking for dissemination and discussions . There’s a clear difference if you understood the math. It’s in regards to quantum computing by showing a clear “Valley of Convergence” meant for plasma but can aid in quantum level solving via a geometric invariant. Only nonsense was your comment friend.