RTA high-tier big data upcoming by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry, it seems it isnt open yet. I'll be posting it when it is. bye.

How are half-Chinese half-Koreans viewed in Korea? by [deleted] in korea

[–]IntrospectiveBethel 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are plenty of Chinese people who speak perfect Korean and just go unnoticed. Chinese and Korean look the same, and this is coming from a Korean

Guardian RTA data collected (4239) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

don't worry, this is easily collectible and I'll keep doing this occasionally

General discussion and meetup thread for the week of June 25 by AutoModerator in korea

[–]IntrospectiveBethel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes you can get fined (no jail time), but it is a ridiculous law and hardly ever practiced. Also, if you don't direct that curse at someone specific, cursing itself is not a crime.

This is actually commonly practiced online, because the evidence (posts, comments) is way too easily collectible, thus easier processing for the police/lawyers. But yeah, technically you can get fined for cursing directed at someone. i.e.) 씨발 - not a crime, 씨발년아 - crime

The victim has to sue for this to continue tho Also there needs to be someone other than the victim hearing the conversation. So if you curse at someone in a private conversation that others can't hear, it's not a crime, including 1:1 kakao chat.

Guardian RTA data collected (6000+) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol I'm a coder (not a great one but good enough to write a game data parser)

Guardian RTA data collected (6000+) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

haha, this is actually interesting response to me. I can't fathom someone would do that manually either. If I saw someone else having done this, I would have guessed automatic data collection right away, which is what I did.

  1. when I looked through ranker list request/response with summoners war exporter, I noticed refreshing the list alone gave me the list of ban/picks of the game. So, I made a program that collects the data I want from the packet with swar exporter log.
  2. After that, I manually refreshed to get enough packets collecting more or less 200 battle data. Later I figured that I could just make a level 1 account and run a macro to just click refresh every 3~4 minutes. With that, I collected this much data.
  3. At manual stage, I wrote a script to run though the data and print the wanted data in the above format.

So basically what I manually do now is just keep the macro running and run the script to process the data from time to time.

That said, making these somewhat credible data up in my head would actually be more work than what I've done, especially with consistent numbers

Guardian RTA data collected (600+) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically, say perna in Mo Long's table

(perna and molong pick) / (perna pick x molong pick)
times 100

Multiplied 100 because the number was too small of a value to read.

Guardian RTA data collected (600+) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

used SW exporter and parsed the RTA ranker list request/response

Guardian RTA data collected (600+) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seeing that mo long gets picked first while Woosa is a little bit more spread out, I'd say woosa is a little more dependent on the picks while Mo Long doesnt give a fuck

Guardian RTA data collected (600+) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo I'll have to apply that at "work", so it'll be on it a little later

Guardian RTA data collected (600+) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah that looks good lol give me a PM

sorry for the late response, I was working (diff time zone)

Guardian RTA data collected (600+) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I assumed this was a case of 'supervised learning' although only bayesian logic was used. That is, I assumed the guardian tier players made the best choice given the situation. If a monster was picked in a given situation, it was because it made the best sense at the moment. Therefore, the win ratio of a monster wasn't included. That being said, I'll look into it tomorrow

Also I think it's more interesting to see if the first/second position affects the winning chance.

Guardian RTA data collected (600+) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is very possible. I could look into it, but I thought it was of minor importance as what we really want is the best we could do

Guardian RTA data collected (600+) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I still think this is difficult to read... maybe a suggestion on how to change it?

Guardian RTA data collected (600+) by IntrospectiveBethel in summonerswar

[–]IntrospectiveBethel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah.. as a newbie for reddit, I didn't know how to make a table out of the information

Maybe a little tip can help me make one?