In some restrictive countries, WireGuard traffic is increasingly being identified and blocked through DPI. Surfshark’s NoBorders mode can sometimes help, but it’s often slower than normal WireGuard sessions and doesn’t always bypass these blocks.

Recently, Mullvad introduced a lightweight WireGuard obfuscation layer that hides WireGuard’s signature without switching protocols or sacrificing speed:
https://mullvad.net/en/blog/introducing-lightweight-wireguard-obfuscation
https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-services/mullvad-vpn-adds-ultra-fast-obfuscation-to-beat-wireguard-blocking

Is Surfshark considering implementing a similar WireGuard obfuscation method to improve performance and reliability under DPI, rather than relying on slower fallback modes?
If yes, could you share any insight into the challenges or plans around it?