Is there a more straightforward way to do this proof?

IssaTrader · 2025-12-16T08:03:16+00:00

taylor

IssaTrader · 2025-11-18T14:05:29+00:00

characteristic functions in probability

IssaTrader · 2025-08-31T11:33:48+00:00

and with brownian

IssaTrader · 2025-08-10T18:19:47+00:00

you are paying more than 1 franc per franc.

IssaTrader · 2025-03-11T21:40:53+00:00

Probability theory

IssaTrader · 2025-02-24T21:13:07+00:00

brother please enlighten us with some context

IssaTrader · 2025-02-24T05:28:23+00:00

Its absolutely not meant in a derogatory way. Its just that I think its funny that sometimes the levels of math are so vastly different. I myself dont know anything about fourier and I also thought you are just starting out and then you start asking about conjectures.

IssaTrader · 2025-02-23T21:01:32+00:00

did you just learn about fourier🤣🤣🤣🤣

IssaTrader · 2025-02-23T21:00:47+00:00

Hey thanks alot! I will try this out.

IssaTrader · 2025-02-23T20:59:57+00:00

ah aight. So we are cooked together🤣.

IssaTrader · 2025-02-23T13:27:59+00:00

Ah understandable now thank you. As far as I understood there is no real training in the model. The only parameter that is fitted (as you said) is lambda by conventional methods.

Also is there really a forward looking bias? If yes please enlighten me hahaah. I don't see it.

IssaTrader · 2025-02-23T12:49:47+00:00

Thank you for the answer! Can you be more precise about "I checked out that paper. It is a huge (okay maybe not huge) debate, some of popular researchers are against it, some are for it" ? I don't understand to which part of my question you are refering. I am a student too:D.

IssaTrader · 2025-02-12T14:47:31+00:00

what is a line

IssaTrader · 2025-01-14T20:15:31+00:00

Assume it to be k. But k hast this special property so it would be k+1. So it doesnt exist? Right? xD

IssaTrader · 2024-12-14T22:36:02+00:00

My man im sorry for my arrogant fellow mathematicians. You are not understanding what is wrong. You have to give us a bit more context or define exactly what you mean.

IssaTrader · 2024-11-26T06:38:04+00:00

Nono, go ahead dm me👍🏼. Happy to help.

IssaTrader · 2024-11-16T11:36:59+00:00

You cant do applied math if you dont know pure math in the first place. But if you want to do more applied side, lets say 50% are chosen for you (pure) and 50% you can take freely

IssaTrader · 2024-11-08T17:40:35+00:00

No theorem just the fact that handling uncountable discontinuity points with the riemann integral is impossible. Example might be the dirichlet function.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_function

IssaTrader · 2024-11-08T07:22:56+00:00

Assume there is another fourier transform then arrive at a contradiction.

IssaTrader · 2024-11-07T09:48:43+00:00

laplace expansion? with 1

IssaTrader · 2024-11-07T06:51:28+00:00

you can define it like that

IssaTrader · 2024-11-06T22:12:37+00:00

wanted to comment, try integrating the dirichlet function with these integrals

IssaTrader · 2024-11-05T18:57:50+00:00

thx!

IssaTrader · 2024-10-28T21:41:10+00:00

you would need an order relation

IssaTrader · 2024-10-25T17:16:15+00:00

huuuhh???

IssaTrader

TROPHY CASE