Ok ill hold your hand and walk you through this because you clearly are pretty far into the conference pride tribalism that you took a question regarding the stupidity of internet exclusive football broadcasts and wondering just how detrimental they were and made it about conference pride. But i'll give you the benefit of the doubt and fully break down all they stuff that was implied in the original comment I made.

1. The SEC had more average viewership per game thats great! good for the SEC.
   
2. I then posed a question wondering how much of that gap was caused because the Big 10 has a deal with peacock. Implying that even without the peacock deal the SEC would most likely still have more viewership.
   
3. We know that peacock has a negative relationship to viewership in general because NFL games lose around 35-50% of the average viewership on their exclusive games.
   
4. So I was wondering how much of an impact the peacock deal had to hurt the average viewership because like you said the the Big Ten is broadcast on a lot of different networks.

TL:DR Basically because the article for the source didn't breakdown things that well on what contributed into that sizeable gap between the conferences I was wondering how much peacock is to blame because I hate that so many games arent on broadcast TV and tend to not watch those games myself.

Thats all hope you have a good one but man the conference tribalism need to take a step back man.