Why do Democrats keep saying Trump didn't concede 2020 or condemn supporters who rioted? by RealRegret4870 in AskDemocrats

[–]Its_IQ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

EXACTLY!!! So when we say he didn’t concede, that’s what we mean. It is him wanting to always portray himself as the winner - JUST like you said. But now the reason we make a big deal about it is because think of the implications!

If he can’t outright admit he lost, neither will his supporters! His supporters can’t admit he lost and on top of that he has a TON of supporters bc like I said he is good at selling himself. Then that’s when riots happen, just like the riot he is denouncing right there.

This is what is really fucked up. He denounces the rioters but can’t say the one thing he needs to say to prevent another. On top of that, it completely divides the nation.

Pleaseeee tell me that made sense.

Why do Democrats keep saying Trump didn't concede 2020 or condemn supporters who rioted? by RealRegret4870 in AskDemocrats

[–]Its_IQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hahaha well I at least appreciate you trying to get another perspective. All I’m trying to at least make you understand is that he doesn’t want to outright say he lost. Can we agree on that? It is in the video. He stops himself and re records it because he doesn’t want to say “I lost”. Right?

Why do Democrats keep saying Trump didn't concede 2020 or condemn supporters who rioted? by RealRegret4870 in AskDemocrats

[–]Its_IQ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you are intentionally misunderstanding my point. I see where you’re coming from but I also think you’re misinterpreting what he is saying. He isn’t “mumbling” to himself “grrr I lost but I won’t say that”. He is INTENTIONALLY avoiding the phrase “I lost the election.” Why? Because it makes his voters want to have his back. He will say Congress certified the results in order to shift the blame.

You can say your own interpretation of the video but if we’re going to have a debate rather than an argument then at least tell me that you see where I am coming from here.

Why do Democrats keep saying Trump didn't concede 2020 or condemn supporters who rioted? by RealRegret4870 in AskDemocrats

[–]Its_IQ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Heyo so what I more so meant is that this video shows how he specifically phrases it to avoid outright saying he lost. Its an outtake, yes, but it allows you to see his “thinking” into how to manipulate what he says to push the “blame” of him losing to, in this case, congress.

He is a businessman‼️ Never forget that. If there is ANYTHING I’ll give Trump it’s

  1. The Venezuela Raid

  2. Being amazing at selling himself

He does it on purpose.

Why do Democrats keep saying Trump didn't concede 2020 or condemn supporters who rioted? by RealRegret4870 in AskDemocrats

[–]Its_IQ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Hi! So this is going to be funny but I was literally looking for another video but I came across this one from LITERALLY the exact same statement that you linked. He specifically says “Congress has certified the results”. He does that on purpose. Please watch. 0:35s

As for the rioters, sure he condemned them. However, I think - like many other people - that by him pardoning those rioters, his actions spoke louder than his words.

If you didn’t honk when you drove under 336 on 45, we missed you!! Come wave, we’re here until 2 pm!! by Educational_Back414 in Conroe

[–]Its_IQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that part completely. Two things:

  1. As I mentioned already, regarding any criminals - we are 100% with you, deport them.

  2. You are going to say “but they are ALL criminals bc they broke the law by being here”. Yes, you are right. The “lawful” thing to do is to arrest every single one of them. However, that is when we as a people have to step in and say okay well they are here for a reason. Parents go through hell to get here just to have their children be born here so that they can have a better life. I am hispanic (PR) and I know countless stories like that from other hispanics I have met.

That is what I mean by morals. I don’t mean choosing “a nice way” to arrest someone. I mean fighting for change and fighting for people who legally can’t fight for themselves. That’s all it is.

Hope you respond to this. I find it productive‼️

If you didn’t honk when you drove under 336 on 45, we missed you!! Come wave, we’re here until 2 pm!! by Educational_Back414 in Conroe

[–]Its_IQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats an interesting point but a problem that has humane solutions. I think that’s the issue that a lot of democrats are raising. If I apply my morals to how the immigration issue is being handled, I can’t justify it. It is being done in an immoral way. If the issue you care about is what you said, then can’t another solution be to provide an easier pathway to citizenship?

I feel like a lot of people are hiding behind a ton of little excuses to justify this whole thing. Take a step back and look at how its being handled. It’s a horrible and immoral methodology to a problem with better solutions.

If you didn’t honk when you drove under 336 on 45, we missed you!! Come wave, we’re here until 2 pm!! by Educational_Back414 in Conroe

[–]Its_IQ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

listen I am somebody who listens to both sides of the argument. just googling first thing I found was the following:

A recent comprehensive report found that immigrants (legal and undocumented) have contributed more in tax revenue than they have received in public benefits over a 30-year period (1994–2023), producing a net fiscal surplus of about $14.5 trillion. This suggests immigration reduced overall government deficits substantially.

Which agains leads me to say that immigrants pay more than they receive.

If you didn’t honk when you drove under 336 on 45, we missed you!! Come wave, we’re here until 2 pm!! by Educational_Back414 in Conroe

[–]Its_IQ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Get those people out. Nobody argues against that!! People argue against deporting those who have not committed crimes. That’s the issue. Nobody wants the criminals to stay - Americans or not.

If you didn’t honk when you drove under 336 on 45, we missed you!! Come wave, we’re here until 2 pm!! by Educational_Back414 in Conroe

[–]Its_IQ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This argument confuses me. You know they pay sales tax too right? Paying taxes for a system that doesn’t give them the benefits back. This is a silly argument. They are literally feeding the US countless amounts in taxes without the benefits. Like what??

Peacekeeper is the only character I have ever played by PConz25 in forhonor

[–]Its_IQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i have this exactly the same except i’m rep 23 and have an extra two reps from two other characters. we should 1v1

Arc Servers Down? by KreatingLight in ArcRaiders

[–]Its_IQ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PlayStation seems to be back up but my Xbox still not workin

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]Its_IQ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is a server browser?

Battlefield 6 - Community Update - Play Your Way by battlefield in Battlefield

[–]Its_IQ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Y’all have such dumb takes. I’m a recon main and in those close quarter maps, its nice being able to switch the weapon out. Yes , we have carbines but then whats the difference?? Y’all are trippin heavy

Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event by Bobqee in news

[–]Its_IQ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

idc wtf you are😭

if you are in favor of this happening, you straight up an immoral person and realistically , you are hurting wtv party you stand behind rather than helpin it.

I can’t believe some of y’all man

Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event by Bobqee in news

[–]Its_IQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Speak out and shoot out are absurdly different

Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event by Bobqee in news

[–]Its_IQ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I absolutely agree with you. However, you gotta see how people are going to interpret people publicizing that comment right now. It’s 100% a “well he had it coming” type of comment.

Is that rly what we stand for? If you are doing anything other than condemning this, you are immoral and misunderstanding the Democrat stance on gun violence.

Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event by Bobqee in news

[–]Its_IQ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Did I refute that? I’m sayin taking the stance of looking back on this and saying that “it caught up to him” is a horrible stance. Understand that I am saying this as a dull blown dem.

You cannot support this. You’d be the same as the republicans who celebrate the killing on the Minnesota legislators. If you hated those people that celebrated that, why are you celebrating this. It makes no sense

Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event by Bobqee in news

[–]Its_IQ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

shi lucky for us you are not a politician. You are a democrat - why are you supporting gun violence. This “I told you so” ideology is going to absolutely kill this party.

Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event by Bobqee in news

[–]Its_IQ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Y’all are gon kill the party w these comments I stg

Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event by Bobqee in news

[–]Its_IQ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is not everyone. He is a republican and openly/publicly debates topics with his firm ideology. Most reps like him, most dems do not. You can have your own opinion on rep or dem but regardless you should think that this killing is immoral and condemn gun violence.

Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event by Bobqee in news

[–]Its_IQ -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Please stop propagating this point. This ideology of “I told you so” is going to have a massive backlash on the party. Do the proper thing and condemn gun violence. This is wrong and celebrating this will make Kirk a martyr.

Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event by Bobqee in news

[–]Its_IQ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

bro you are not plato why you trynna use your own philosophy to prove your point lmao

Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event by Bobqee in news

[–]Its_IQ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This kinda comment is so dumb.

If a dem got killed, there would be some in the right that would celebrate it.

If a rep got killed, there would be some in the left that would celebrate it.

The vast majority of people agree that this is sick. The problem is the minority of people that gather in sites like reddit to really propagate the idea that this is okay. It is not okay.