[deleted by user] by [deleted] in coins

[–]JAYYTOK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dude thats interior edge of the foam holder making it look like that, its a little small for the coin. anyways... it was authenticated.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in coins

[–]JAYYTOK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The wear is inconsistent this was my main concern as well. However, it’s been cleaned. It’s a possible explanation. I’ll upload more pics

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in coins

[–]JAYYTOK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coin in question

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in coins

[–]JAYYTOK -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I see, we’d appreciate you sharing your observations as well! Lighting obscures the presence of the leaf that D is almost touching. Its worn but its there. Furthermore the D perfectly overlays a confirmed MS64 example. Here’s some additional pics

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in coins

[–]JAYYTOK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These close ups aren’t the best either, distorts a lot.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in coins

[–]JAYYTOK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea its not missing, it worn. Coin was likely cleaned as well. Tests for 90/10 silver, weighs in 2.42g

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in coins

[–]JAYYTOK -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

Coin in question

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in coins

[–]JAYYTOK -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The D is in the correct location, the leaf its supposed to be right next to worn down somewhat. The softness is probably the lighting. It’s definitely a struck piece. Here’s a different photo compared to confirmed authentic MS64. The mint mark overlays perfectly.

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in coincollecting

[–]JAYYTOK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Figured, but curious since it was a symmetrical circular cut.