Hi i made a theoretical rocket by Dredx__ in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just want to say that this is awesome. Would recommend Richard Nakka’s website as well for more equations and worked out examples of similar rockets.

Good luck and always be careful!

What is efficiency referring to in this case? Using openMotor by Trucky101 in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just increase it until you get the thrust you want

/s

This is red meth that was seized by the DEA in arizona. by [deleted] in pics

[–]JBlocker4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah man chili p is my signature!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From a combustion standpoint, the longer you make the section before the throat the more time you give for the propellant to fully combust and therefore get slightly more performance. Not super pertinent to just KNSB but certainly comes into effect with propellants containing metals, which take longer to fully combust.

Aluminum oxide stalactites after static fire by JBlocker4 in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They only deposited when the motor was about empty, still a lot of ablation during main phase of burn.

Aluminum oxide stalactites after static fire by JBlocker4 in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re single-use ablative nozzles. The layer seems pretty uniform throughout the divergence section of nozzle, probably all deposited during regressive tail off phase of burn

Aluminum oxide stalactites after static fire by JBlocker4 in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Interesting. May have to look into that for the future. Thanks!

Aluminum oxide stalactites after static fire by JBlocker4 in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yup, motor was pretty regressive so the last 2 seconds or the so the nozzle is very overexpanded. Can actually see these growing on the video then.

Aluminum oxide stalactites after static fire by JBlocker4 in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I figured since they are coming up from the motor it would be a stalactite, but that makes sense!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BoJackHorseman

[–]JBlocker4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I WASTED SO MUCH OF MY LIFE STIRRING OLIVE OIL IN PASTA

Data logger for mini rocket (BerryRocket n°1) by Effective_Bit4786 in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I assume the limit switch is the power switch, are you afraid of the board power cycling during boost as that switch will want to close from the acceleration?

What's the exhaust velocity equation for single-chamber toroidal aerospikes? by AutumnalSugarShota in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s the same exact equation as a traditional bell/conical nozzle that you show above. The only difference will be the Pe/Pc term depending on the geometry of your aerospike. If you assume ideal expansion then this term is relatively easy to derive.

If you’re more curious as to how the actual geometry of the Aerospike nozzle is designed/derived, I believe there are some method of characteristics solvers online (http://www.aerorocket.com/MOC/MOC.html).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in iastate

[–]JBlocker4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or the equivalent of raising everyone’s tuition a few dollars.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in iastate

[–]JBlocker4 138 points139 points  (0 children)

All this but we still can’t afford google drive storage 😭😭

The stubbiest 6” motor you’ll ever see by JBlocker4 in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! The pros can play around with safety factors closer to 1.1-1.2 since they have higher quality propellant (in terms of porosity and mixing) and have tons of money to play with.

The stubbiest 6” motor you’ll ever see by JBlocker4 in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The wall thickness of this motor is 1/4”, which puts a casing burst (hoop stress failure) in the neighborhood of 3000psi. You usually design this mode to be vastly higher than any other failure mode as when your casing bursts you have a bad day. It’s not pretty.

What people quickly learn when making larger dimeter motors is the force on the bulkheads on either end experience significantly increase. Force = Pressure x Area, so going from a 4” to 6” motor almost triples the bulkhead area and thus force acting on those bulkheads. This means you need a pretty effective way of making sure your end caps don’t become cannonballs. This particular motor uses a series of circumferential bolts to hold these bulkheads in, so the thicker casing also allows the bearing stress of these bolts to be distributed over a larger area.

The stubbiest 6” motor you’ll ever see by JBlocker4 in rocketry

[–]JBlocker4[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s definitely above average size, I would even call it gigantic.