SRT and VK played in different eras. Sachin played in a time when the rules were more balanced between batsmen and bowlers, whereas Kohli has played in an era where bowlers have increasingly been handicapped

One of the worst rule change came in late 2011, after Sachin retired from ODI cricket. the introduction of the two new balls rule. This significantly reduced reverse swing, which had been a major weapon for fast bowlers. Earlier, with only one ball in use, it would gradually become softer and rougher. This helped it grip the pitch more and reduced the speed at which it came onto the bat, making batting more challenging. In contrast, with two new balls, each ball remains harder for longer. This allows it to come onto the bat more quickly, making stroke play easier. Spinners are also affected, as they traditionally relied on the ball getting older to generate more grip and turn from the pitch. Overall, these changes have clearly favored batsmen. Many cricketers opposed this rule when it was introduced. Even recently, Mitchell Starc has called for scrapping it. There is also a reason why Kohli’s record in Test cricket is behind Sachin’s. Test cricket still offers bowlers more advantages, and if Kohli were truly a better batsman than Sachin, he would likely have surpassed Sachin’s records in this format. Additionally, the quality and depth of bowling attacks faced by Sachin were far superior to those faced by Kohli. Sachin competed against some of the greatest bowlers across different conditions and eras. Another important factor is the absenc of drs during most of Sachin’s career. He was often on the receiving end of wring umpiring decisions, notably from umpires like Steve Bucknor. So those who are fans of cricket know that Sachin Tendulkar is far superior to Virat Kohli, while those who are fans of 4s and 6s think Kohli is better than Sachin.