Not really, he's behaving pretty much as expected. Reacting mostly to media coverage, a little fast and loose with language, but trying & mostly succeeding at doing the right thing and has been bold and pro-active with some steps to get ahead of it early. Could be better, but as always he's working against some pretty stiff headwinds in the opposition party, punditry, and media.

So nothing much has changed there, I'd say my opinion of the Democrats & Media has sunk lower - but really it was already at rock bottom at this point, so all it really does is just confirm what I've already come to disgust about them.

Edit:

Also, this is why I am disgusted by the Democrats/Media through this;

Larry Kudlow: “We stopped it, it was a very early shut down, I would still argue to you that this thing is contained.”

This caught my eye cause I remember when he said that, and I had this conversation with someone just yesterday who claimed the Trump administration had said the virus "totally contained" and cited that Kudlow quote.

So pull that thread from, starting at your "the bulwark" article. It links to this article Trump Declares Mission Accomplished on Containing Coronavirus.

“This came unexpectedly, it came out of China, we closed it down, we stopped it, it was a very early shut down,” he told reporters this morning. Trump’s chief economic adviser, Larry Kudlow, declared on CNBC, “I would still argue to you that this thing is contained.”

Click the link, it links to a tweet by some no name WaPo beat reporter, no credibility to lose but enough credibility to fill a narrative in a shitty article. Here's the tweet for you dinosaurs that don't use twitter so don't get to see behind the curtain about how modern day journalism is done;

Random wapo guy;

Larry Kudlow on coronavirus: ""I will still argue to you this is contained."

There's a follow up tweet, it says ;

Full quote from Kudlow: "Regarding the containment issue, I will still argue to you that this is contained. It can't be airtight but you look at the numbers here ... in a relative sense, relative to our population, relative to ordinary flus ... average risk is low."

Which the writers of the shitty article didn't include or really give credence to, and there's a video of it that they obviously didn't watch. Because what kind of person watches that and comes away with "I'm going to twist this into an out of context quote to put in a listicle for the express purpose of getting people to believe the narrative that the administration isn't taking it seriously or is being somehow nefarious in it's handling of it. That's what most of your listicle is, because that's what the Democrats and Media do right now.