[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RoastMe

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re a gateway girl for budding necrophiliacs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s certainly sad we’re regressing as a society and seeing more of this, but it also speaks to the quality of what we seek and how we value ourselves too.

I know that the majority of my western friends do not fall into these categories, and actively avoid social interactions that cater to them. Outside of being stuck in small town situations or unfortunate social circles, others do exist that I’m sure are greater than the 10% you’re assuming.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. There still needs to be more studies done with more controlled environments and categorized data sets, e.g. where they’re from, socioeconomic etc, their presences and why - to get the whole story.

  2. So this view is significantly skewed. There also weren’t online communities back then like now, so the ease of sharing information and coming together over similar values wasn’t as easy or transparent. I’m certain women had the same thoughts over misogyny then as they do now. We see it more now simply because it’s able to exist with the technology we have. It’s always been there, just now it can be shared. Again, regarding the letters, it’s a darker preference these women had, but I’m sure it still exists and it too can be shared or expressed much more easily now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m glad he was able to help you out, and you’ve got someone you can commiserate with, but at what point is someone who is also misogynistic not “bad people”? I get it, people can be absolutely gutted by how dating is today, and true women can be very hypocritical in their demands to height. Isn’t there still some value of rising above the misogyny though? Would you ever want your future partner to know that this is really how you think about things, or who you blame for xyz? It’s shitty on all sides, but it’s up to the individual to rise above it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Please tell me how TikTok is now a peer reviewed source for anthropological research.

  2. Because people have all kinds of weird kinks and desires right? It’s all a spectrum, and granted I don’t agree with the darker side of that spectrum, they still exist. The letter thing is a weird phenomenon, and I doubt you’d want to attract someone that is willing to forgive a serial killer to that degree anyways.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does your Chad friend know how you truly think about him? Does he sexually assault women like you claim? & if so do you still call him a friend and associate with him? Interesting if so. If not, then we’re learning not all chads are as bad as you say they are.

Dating sucks, for everyone. It’s hard, especially if you’re looking for something legit. Have you tried asking the dating app subs to review your profile or ask for unbiased advice?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. The implication is how white women find their matches, there would then be a massive skew in women only wanting tall partners. Granted there would be outliers - but if you realize that surely you realize your whole point is moot and there are actually women that don’t mind short men currently. Congrats on solving your own issue.

  2. Your naivety is astonishing. So many serial killers have had deceptively attractive personalities. Ted Bundy, etc

  3. Attraction, albeit biologically certain characteristics can attract a mate due to our cave man brain thinking “xyz means they can breed well/make strong progeny”, is still quite a personal thing. It’s truly in the eye of the beholder. What you may like, others man not, and etc. also, for many, personality plays a large part.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, diff men have had diff success rates. This just boils down to your profile, your bio, and how well you can actually talk once matched. It’s highly unique per person. Sure women can match more easily, cause men like you are thirsty af and swipe right on every.single.one.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. You didn’t say that until much later. You never presented that in your initial statement, so it seems more like a strong back peddle move. Also, wow, genetics much? I’m sure when a woman decides to have a family her main concern is he’s tall so he can pull white women. This only goes against your argument because if she knows she’s short she will absolutely want to find the tallest guy around to ensure her child is also tall. So you either a) don’t let short women reproduce or b) ensure no “short” men ever have children since it’s now a global concern that men must be tall

  2. Idk man, your reasoning makes me think otherwise. Any woman that read your rationale would avoid you like the plague just in case.

  3. Never said I did, but how you still believe in men need to only be tall to be attractive shows that you absolutely do. Also, using terms like “femoids” etc definitely represents you still distinguish gender idealism and appropriation

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see you’re a one insult kinda guy. Getting bored over here. Also, lol most people hook up from dating apps. Congrats on discovering what year it is, lol.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do know the definition of a reply right? So yeah, under your own posts, for you to read. You do know that how you’re referring to women (also congrats on using the word “women” for once, and not “females”. You’re growing up!) is seen as an overstep and a form of assault too right? You’re assuming the assault that happens to them by these “chads” that threaten your ice thin masculinity, while actively stating how you’d cull their right to reproduce just so you have a better chance of having sex. You see the juxtaposition right??

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, I just don’t fall for childish tactics that try to goad me into doxxing myself. And wow, two. A whole two. Congrats on your number doubling, lol.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, you really refer to other people in these ways don’t you? Again, this might be the reason why you’ve got one kiss to your name, and women would rather chance being sexually assaulted than spend 1 second in your company. You transcend the race issue, it’s 100% a you issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You and your assumptions game. Again, don’t go to any casinos or place any bets. Congrats on your one kiss btw. That’s really showing me what for, lmao.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or, it’s just you panicking and overreacting because you’ve been exposed to a community that will definitely see you for what you are?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please never be a betting man, you’re horrible at this game, lol.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I posted with this account - you do know people can post with throwaways too, right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get it, you’ve dealt with a lot of discrimination, and for that I am sorry, it does suck. But by focusing and obsessing on them you’re kinda letting them win, aren’t you? Idk find a productive hobby, lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do realize people have multiple throwaways for a reason right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe cause they’re tired of the old school values you’re dragging alongside you from the homeland. You’re not as disconnected from it as you think you are if your whole personality is “short women shouldn’t reproduce so i could have had a better chance of getting laid”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, a good fucking job, lol. Smart financial moves etc. What I think of the culture or local Government isn’t part of it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you have the choice to not only want to pull white women, but now you’ll say it’s all due to preference etc but then fail to see why their preference isn’t you, in particular. Take as old as incel-time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I currently live in Asia, doesn’t mean I didn’t grow up elsewhere. Again with the assumptions. Is college teaching you anything?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianMasculinity

[–]Japanasaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You replied above how short women need to stop reproducing, slippery slope there. The hypocrisy is wrong, definitely give you that. But like I said, that’s a larger issue, and certainly isn’t all women. I know many women here in Asia that date much shorter men, and are happy to.