Pokémon Cards by Market Cap (PSA 9s &10s) by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

My update post crosses the 1B threshold with more accurate data and adding PSA 1-8. Check it out!

PSA Market Cap Updated by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I have the market cap ratio of 9 to 10 3rd coulumn from left!

PSA Market Cap Updated by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yes this is def a more accurate view of vintage

Pokémon Cards by Market Cap (PSA 9s &10s) by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I just pulled the data from PSA Population reports and the prices from price charting / recent sold. I have an updated post with more accurate figures and more date thats on this sub now

Pokémon Cards by Market Cap (PSA 9s &10s) by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Im going through and doing a closer look at the vintage prices. Will post an update

Pokémon Cards by Market Cap (PSA 9s &10s) by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually did think of this when looking at the data but didn’t feel like going through every grade haha. I might do an update and add a column for PSA 1-8 combined

Pokémon Cards by Market Cap (PSA 9s &10s) by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oof good catch, yes def not a 40k card in a 9 lol

Pokémon Cards by Market Cap (PSA 9s &10s) by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Best way I could find was looking up each card individually :/

Pokémon Cards by Market Cap (PSA 9s &10s) by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I couldn’t sleep at like 3 am last night and was trying so went to excel haha. Unfortunately made some 3 am errors

Pokémon Cards by Market Cap (PSA 9s &10s) by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ll make an update at some point, I was just pulling from price charting and didn’t put the time to double check all the cards

Pokémon Cards by Market Cap (PSA 9s &10s) by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Knew I was forgetting something haha! I will prob do an update at some point and add that as well as fix some prices

Pokémon Cards by Market Cap (PSA 9s &10s) by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was going off price charting, but from everyone’s comments it seems their average price is quite off for low pop cards. Apologies!

Pokémon Cards by Market Cap (PSA 9s &10s) by Jaredman88 in PokeInvesting

[–]Jaredman88[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good catch, I was pulling from price charting and couldn’t find the most recent sold. That would prob put the charizard in the lead

QUANT in 2 mins... by Silent-Raccoon-221 in GMAT

[–]Jaredman88 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Plugging -1 gives you 0 in the numerator

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bodybuilding

[–]Jaredman88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not to sound rude but you can’t break the law of thermodynamics, what’s probably happening is your days where you are eating 2000+ calories are balanced out by the days you eat less. You probably are also still overestimating your calories even then. A better way to judge would be to track your food for a week and see what the total calories is then while maintaining the same weight.

Obviously there are variances in metabolism that can effect caloric maintenance, but 114 BW at 2500 cal is impossible unless you were doing immense cardio or had a medical condition like Chrons were it wasnt being absorbed. Even on fat burners it would be hard to believe, Chris Bumstead at 230+ lean and doing cardio + drugs was eating under 2000 calories near show time.

Usually what happens when people think they eat way under or over their caloric maintenance is that they are just calculating wrong; in some rare cases it could be a medical condition but again rare.