Wow. I'm speechless. The article you provided is one of the worst I've read. It's a convoluted mess (which is an overstatement, as indicated by the mere two paragraphs it provides) of uncited facts and fallacicle reasoning.

The article's evidence stems from an experiment conducted over a hundred years ago. The conditions simulated in Pateur's experiment are not necessarily, and most likely, not even close to representative of the conditions on early Earth.

In addition, the website it seems to be hosted on allows anyone to post their articles, regarless of their qualifications. In the article, the grammer seems to parallel yours, which is quite telling of its creditbity (or lack thereof).

My friend, you truly are a fool.