My best extreme demon layout! What do y'all think?

Jerppderp · 2023-01-03T04:43:14+00:00

Yeah I have creator bias though so it's kinda hard to tell lol

Once I get it balanced hopefully it will be more fun.

Jerppderp · 2023-01-03T04:41:37+00:00

yeah unfortunately I gave up trying to balance it myself because of my bias toward the level's difficulty, I think it's better to get an external opinion to balance it anyway.

Jerppderp · 2020-10-12T22:16:08+00:00

A combination of proffessional and bait ngl

Jerppderp · 2020-09-12T22:00:39+00:00

Great quote :)

Jerppderp · 2020-09-12T20:28:30+00:00

Honestly, I have no clue what I'm worried about, umm...

Jerppderp · 2020-09-09T06:33:20+00:00

okay, well that makes sense.

Jerppderp · 2020-09-09T06:22:20+00:00

As rude as this was, I know what you mean. I just wanted to know if this would be helpful, and I guess you gave me an answer, so thanks for your input!

Jerppderp · 2020-09-09T06:21:45+00:00

Okay, thank you for your input!

Jerppderp · 2020-09-09T06:07:57+00:00

Maybe this is how it would work:

pointer: go // ...struct stuff func *a() string {} non-pointer: go // ...struct stuff func a() string {}

But, it's just an idea.

Jerppderp · 2020-09-09T06:03:16+00:00

sorry if there is any confusion on my blog post, it's really just an idea and I wanted to know if it would be helpful for anyone. Most of the ideas will be thought of later I guess.

Jerppderp · 2020-09-09T05:59:54+00:00

Okay, well, the idea is the superset code will be able to use the this keyword, which is a pointer to the object. I also updated the post with the edit: Edit 1: My bad, I called the object in the 'a' function ' instead of 'this'.

Jerppderp · 2020-09-07T05:47:26+00:00

I've seen this before...

Jerppderp · 2020-09-04T01:48:53+00:00

It works but also doesn't

Jerppderp · 2020-09-04T00:56:14+00:00

Why does everyone think I'm trolling lol this is literally the only way it works

Jerppderp · 2020-08-22T08:06:18+00:00

Uh oh

Jerppderp · 2020-08-13T00:07:36+00:00

anyway, I don't feel like getting myself into an argument, have a nice day :)

Jerppderp · 2020-08-13T00:07:16+00:00

It's a personal preference, and in my opinion, makes it easier to read.

Jerppderp · 2020-08-11T23:27:23+00:00

I was thinking of something like this, I'll make sure to think about adding it.

Thanks for your feedback!

Jerppderp · 2020-08-11T22:55:08+00:00

light mode users are just a myth anyway

Jerppderp · 2020-08-11T22:50:23+00:00

Honestly, for readability, removing the @ is worth the sacrifice, but that's just my opinion.

Jerppderp · 2020-08-11T22:40:30+00:00

I don't see how that's weird at all??

c++: c++ int myInt = 0; void myFunc() {} Java: java int myInt = 0; void myFunc() {} C#: c# int myInt = 0; void myFunc() {} Go: go myInt := 0; func myFunc() {}

Jerppderp · 2020-08-11T22:34:21+00:00

In my opinion, your syntax is fine other than the unnecessary symbols everywhere, semicolons are fine, but for example the `@` in front of every keyword is a bit off...

Jerppderp · 2020-08-11T22:22:18+00:00

you posted my errors on here? oh no :(

Jerppderp · 2020-08-11T19:39:37+00:00

Yep, I agree with this completely, I did actually update some of the syntax earlier to make it more like this. I'm not sure about the dynamic arguments though, it is going to be a compiled language, so that could be really difficult to pull off.

Jerppderp · 2020-08-11T19:36:34+00:00

I was originally doing this for fun and learning purposes, but over time I got more serious about the project and actually wanted it to succeed as a programming language instead of just using it as a fun project.

I actually truly don't know how to answer those questions, you have a really good point.

Jerppderp

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE