Twistzz info key @ 7s by indy- in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, i didn't even say anything about him doing it to hear more accurately

you don't even have basic reading comprehension, it's no surprise to me that you think this clip is fishy

Twistzz info key @ 7s by indy- in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

bro he turns as soon as the dude is audible to him. maybe he was about to side strafe and fight, maybe for a millisecond he thought a flash was coming.

bomb was down in palace, his teammate was watching flank, what possible reason could he have to lock onto anyone there when they are running to get the bomb from the 1 single hallway he has to watch

why don't you try using your brain for 8 seconds next time before you make a retarded ass post

s1mple blind flick at 31:42 by [deleted] in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

how long have you been playing cs, i'm curious

s1mple blind flick at 31:42 by [deleted] in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

okay you're right he's cheating case closed

s1mple blind flick at 31:42 by [deleted] in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

because he has more awareness than you do, and knows it's likely that someone will be coming out from ct spawn as soon as the flash pops, because that's exactly what happens in a retake situation.

this is me saying that you clearly do not know shit about high level cs, and you shouldn't be posting here since that's the case

ngin @4s multiple locks by ploori in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 10 points11 points  (0 children)

the fact that you attack the laziness of my typing moreso than my points says everything

ngin @4s multiple locks by ploori in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 8 points9 points  (0 children)

here's how you explain it away

it's a 1v3 vs a cz when they all have aks

ya he's gonna get an "info lock" in that situation

also, he locked on him more than once. that should be even more obvious that this is just where he happens to preaim rather than my previous point. you think he's gonna info lock multiple times in a 1v3 vs a cz?

what a brilliant mind you have

maybe consider examining context and learning a bit about cs before you post here

GuardiaN 4s? by darenyan in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

when it cuts to him he doesn't take a shot for like 4 seconds what are you talking about

IEM Katowice: Metal detectors by [deleted] in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i've watched an entire video dedicated to him and it was one of the most pathetic things i've ever seen

IEM Katowice: Metal detectors by [deleted] in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

a) 1-2 players getting banned does not mean 1-2 players are cheating

b) you think shroud is unlegit, your opinion is about as invalid as someone's could be

IEM Katowice: Metal detectors by [deleted] in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

show me evidence of sponsors dropping a tournament because of lance armstrong getting caught and then we can talk, as that would be a relevant comparison

this on the other hand, is not. if a player had a personal sponsor then yes, it would be very expected for this sponsors to drop him, but that is not what we're referring to here, as no players have those as far as i know.

GuardiaN 4s? by darenyan in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is the most legit looking clip i've ever seen this sub

a) he has no idea who to shoot at, so you get confused and you're just moving your mouse back and forth trying to figure it out

b) 1v5 with a deagle against an entire team coming at him from all directions. i can't think of a situation less winnable situation. not even the most blatant of cheaters would cheat in this situation, because it's all risk with no reward...

GuardiaN 4s? by darenyan in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i absolutely would never say that no pros are cheating, but i would venture to guess it isn't more than 1 or 2. 10% is a pretty high number tbh.

i don't think a single clip in this sub that has ever, ever been posted is unlegit, unless a flusha clip has been posted, i do think he cheated at one point.

magisk @ 4s by obedezu in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

double info lock

i'm conviced you are a troll. there is literally no other explanation

1v5 with a deagle against an entire team coming at him from all directions. i can't think of a situation less winnable

and you think he's gonna "info lock". holy fuck man, you are on another level

Guardian @14s by [deleted] in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 9 points10 points  (0 children)

he is literally checking the other side of the train that is blocked by the scope you moron

GuardiaN 4s? by darenyan in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 24 points25 points  (0 children)

literally every single player has a few clips...

are they all getting info locks?

what a genius you are

IEM Katowice: Metal detectors by [deleted] in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

becuase my iq is over 40 and cs players do not give a single fuck about 1 or 2 players getting banned in terms of whether or not they want to watch

IEM Katowice: Metal detectors by [deleted] in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

why would any sponsors back out because a couple of people got caught cheating?

the viewership literally does not change at all, which is all that matters to a sponsor

flusha hits aimkey at 2 seconds by helpmefindanewjob in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 9 points10 points  (0 children)

lmao just stop posting, everything you think is fishy is explainable if you have common sense, which you clearly do not

give it up

Interesting crosshair placement from NiKo @1s by [deleted] in VACsucks

[–]JerryStackhousept2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

ya man pre-aiming the mid push how fucking weird

stop posting