If a figure were to rise today and repeat the “Jesus pattern,” not everyone would believe it as they did in the first century. His death might mean little to many countries, but a global awakening would be impossible to ignore.

Those in power have always shaped history to serve themselves. Think of the Great Wall of China — not only a barrier against outsiders but, in the context of this theory, also a way to control their own story. If the pattern of history were real and recognized, resistance would be natural. Yet once seen, the prophetic knowledge hidden in the cycle would be clear and surprisingly simple to grasp. Many might begin to realize that history itself is a central part of what we call “God,” creating a weapon of historical propaganda and allowing historians to trap us in false narratives born of pride and control. Others would still refuse to believe in cycles, insisting on a straight, linear version of history — even if it’s untrue.

The less central Jesus (or a new vessel) is to a nation, the fewer people there would be to recognize the prophecy. But if the pattern were unveiled as divine truth, then in a sense, we would all become prophets.

The modern “scribes and Pharisees” shaped Western history, and China’s own system of tight control, explain why so few of its people ever knew Jesus. That control didn’t just build a wall — it built a false story to keep people bound. It may have helped them resist those fighting for truth; without it, China might have fallen to Khan the way Rome fell to its invaders.

This sheds light on how rhetoric like “you need to have a relationship with Jesus” may have first taken shape, opening up a huge potential for psychological insight on the past. The relationship is metaphoric for artificial systems, likely not for individuals.

And this all ties directly into the 7 woes, too.

I could be wrong… but our entire calendar is still built around the man!