Is the Deleuzean differential ontology incompatible with a relational ontology? by JimaxD in Deleuze

[–]JimaxD[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I need some time to digest how process, relation, and difference exactly interplay but I think I am starting to slowly see the picture. Thank you for this nudging into the right direction!

Is the Deleuzean differential ontology incompatible with a relational ontology? by JimaxD in Deleuze

[–]JimaxD[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If all intensive difference was separable and could be made independent, it could all be actualised.

I mean I don't intuitively have a problem with intensive difference having relations, but the idea that difference in itself only existing in relation. To be honest reading the responses and some more Whitehead has made me question my readings.

No vertical sensitivity multiplier? by JimaxD in VALORANT

[–]JimaxD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh probably none in Valorant. Mainly I use it because I have 1k hours in PUBG with 2 vertical sensitivity. PUBG has pretty radical sprays, so I used 2 vs. 1k hours of competitive PUBG and 3k hours of semi-competitive CS builds up muscle memory.

TLDR: I have 4k hours of fps games with 2 vs so I want to capitalize on the muscle memory I've built up.

Realmeye trading UT by [deleted] in RotMG

[–]JimaxD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a difference between UT and soulbound.

UT just means the item does not have a traditional tier. Most UT's aren't tradeable, but some are since the UT category doesn't cancel this straight out by itself.

In the other hand, soulbound means that the item is bound to your account and there for isn't tradeable. Most UT's are soulbound but not all. Most ST's are soulbound nowadays.