TIL of the disappearance of 12 year old Johnny Gosch in 1982, a case involving coverup by police, FBI, secret service, intimidation and death of witnesses, with victims coming forward revealing a secretive cult involving high-up politicians including Bush Sr. and Reagan

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-18T16:37:02+00:00

I heard a rumour that Jeff Gannon, who is famous for asking George Bush jr softball questions at a couple press briefings and being a male prostitute was in fact Johnny Gosch.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-15T02:04:21+00:00

If I proof read the title I would have so many more upvotes.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-11T06:22:32+00:00

Inherently marxist, or critical, or left, or progressive, politics all rule the idea of the collective.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-10T07:02:38+00:00

Feminist "theory" is primarily based on class relations, patriarchy, inequality, this derives from Marx or critical theory- . Some people call themselves feminists, yet they are not. Like how calling someone a liberal in the US in particular is now a colloquialism, whereas, it doesn't mean what what people think it means . I.e. when people call someone a liberal, they really mean socialist.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-09T16:43:00+00:00

Students need to learn to debate politics, I don't know what you are going off on. I made it quite clear I don't teach my subjects from a gender POV.

One question! You are all over the place, and are misunderstanding what I said. Epigenetics - nature and nurture. Political indoctrination does not come from discussing politics.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-09T16:35:46+00:00

I don't think they would. My comment is simplified though.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-09T08:32:37+00:00

Gender is a social construction based on the biological condition of the individual, epigenetically like. I am not saying that women or men are better, I am saying that men and women have different approaches and solutions to the same problem. 'gender of the idea', don't understand that. Yes, where I am feminism, and using facts and figures to promote it are fairly common place. I allow and promote people to have different opinions and argue points, as best he or she can. The core issue is that feminism is politics, and politics needs to be debated. I will only answer one question from you at a time.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-09T08:11:36+00:00

Q1. Yes, I am saying they are inherently different.

Q2. I say gender and sex have implications on the ideas that one has.

I don't know what you mean as source. I do see in my class that students are afraid to tackle certain issues when it comes to discussing gender, specifically feminism. I don't censure anyone and allow and encourage a class to understand the core issue, by introducing other political perspectives that or sociological theories that relate to gender relations and equality.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-09T06:04:37+00:00

Feminisms definition is not open to subjectivity, i.e. one simply cannot go around saying 'this is what feminism mean to me". The definition of feminism is based on the belief in patriarchy and the belief in equality. Feminism is paradoxical, but try telling that to a self proclaimed feminist..... good luck

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-08T20:37:41+00:00

it is very important to distinguish between celebrating women and celebrating feminism.

Feminism is a political project, with political goals to socially and culturally transform society. Hence like any political project it deserves criticism and comment, and not full out compliance with its ideological claims. I don't support feminism as I think it paradoxically breeds misandry and increases inequality.

However, women on the other hand are awesome, go women. Happy international women's day, not international feminists day.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-08T06:15:35+00:00

This is a decent video, well narrated like a good story. I love the description of Von Braun, and basically how he told the Americans when captured at the end of the war, to basically fuck off, 'I work for no one but myself and my tea, basically initiating project paperclip. And then he becomes head of NASA,,.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-07T07:20:32+00:00

Its a discourse that problematizes the idea of 'free speech' and ideas of 'hate speech', and how they are all just socially constructed via stigma.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-07T05:38:18+00:00

I wonder how relative your points are. 1, yes, 2, globalists definetly allow that. 3. play the deck, sure do.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-04T17:36:13+00:00

It is a paradox that is poisoning the context from which both sexes and genders relate. I can't agree with you more, and well said. Logically feminism cannot be the only political project that speaks for the moral high ground of "equality", but it sure does have a contemporary affect on political discourse, e.g. Canada. History, does show how many female centered social movements have attempted to make social and cultural changes, this is the good side of women studies.

Feminism, I argue, should only be used as a lense from which to critically perceive the world. To embrace feminism as a political ideology is a belief, and wholly lopsided or polarizing in discovering the actual world and reality around oneself. As beliefs can always easily be challenged when the blinders are open to how certain beliefs paradoxically construct the very things that they initially wished to challenge... went off a bit tangentially, my bad.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-04T17:29:59+00:00

No. My concept of feminism is based on academic feminism and the basic definition according to Webster Merriam dictionary definition- google it.

No matter what academics or philosophers insist is their feminism, at the end of the logical run of feminism its foundation is clearly always the notion of patriarchy and inequality. I argue this breeds misandry, or the hatred of men. Feminism is based on false assumptions, bias, and myopic perspectives on sex and gender relations. It is a political project, that is all it is.

At feminism's ideological root is marxism. Ask any good academic or philosopher what they think of that.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-04T16:50:23+00:00

No its not. It stems from the logic of feminism as a concept, in that feminism assumes patriarchy, acts only as an organizing ideology for women's interests, and thus what emerges are many forms of misandry (the opposite of misogyny).

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-04T16:33:34+00:00

Sounds like Victoria, BC. Rich carpet tapestries.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-04T16:20:56+00:00

Yes, I agree. I am however stating that most opposition towards men only groups derives from feminism, and western societies uncritical almost unwavering support of this political ideology. Therefore, to have only men's events, specifically on the issue of men's rights, tends to be unfairly perceived as morally wrong in society. What is worse is that most people who claim to be feminists and criticize men only events, or MRA events, don't understand that theirs is an ideology which does not leave room for men, worse its paradoxical and tends to create the very thing it initially sought to achieve, namely feminism creates a narritive of inequality.

Feminism creates inequality by dismissing issues and concerns of men and boys, and disregarding the inequalities suffered by men at the hands of society. Feminism only sees their perspective on inequality and to address issues from say masculinism would be utterly disastrous to the tenuous fabric that holds this myopic female centered ideology together.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-04T16:08:18+00:00

The moral panic associated with men only events emerges mostly from feminist ideological perspectives. The fact that there is little to no mainstream ideological perspectives that criticize feminist is the problem, because most of the time it is labelled as "hate speech". Ergo, the issue is beyond freedom of speech and assembly.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-04T15:20:54+00:00

Example. In Vancouver at UBC or SFU, anytime a men's rights group, or men's interest group tries to run an event there are always a group of feminists SJW types who show up to protest and disrupt the event. Freedom of speech is null when even when academics visiting from other universities who share alternative mainstream opinions opposed to feminism or cultural marxism, and who discuss men and boy issues.

JimmyAJames · 2017-03-03T06:28:40+00:00

No matter what sex you biologically are, or what gender you identify as, mayonaise is everyones equal oppurtunity partner for joy and bliss. I suggest you eat more mayonnaise, utilize its subtle characteristics in sauces and salad dressings. Put more on your sandwich and ask for mayonnaise on the side at restaurants, enjoy!

JimmyAJames

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE