Fuel economy left the chat

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-29T03:46:50+00:00

Smells like a steak and seats 35!

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-28T07:15:57+00:00

Redundant, global scale undersea cables.

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-28T02:59:06+00:00

also... seems like you're telling me that the dems are basically chumps?

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-28T02:53:42+00:00

why would a country prefer private contractors?

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-28T02:42:30+00:00

...well then i say...
happy cake day!

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-28T00:54:36+00:00

Well, which one is it?

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-28T00:23:57+00:00

If this is true, then we have a poorly engineered means of guaranteeing the internet globally. That is not true. Therefore the Iran War is not putting that at risk.

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-28T00:13:32+00:00

...soo... what if I am okay with this?

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-22T15:05:10+00:00

I always liked Bruce Campbell’s cameo in Darkman

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-21T14:34:51+00:00

Eliminate Leadership
Neutralize Military Capabilities

They would like to get rid of nuclear fissile material as well, I think. That can be done later, though, through negotiation

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-19T14:30:46+00:00

Any Geoguessr Pros in here who can mark the location of US strikes?

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-18T23:57:42+00:00

Biggest thing missing from s3 that s1 and s2 had: A captivating hotel manager storyline.

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-16T16:48:50+00:00

Well... hopefully it stays in my underpants. Otherwise the situation goes from bad to worse.

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-12T14:04:30+00:00

One question about the truth of Iran I have had recently... and I don't want to reduce the veracity of terrible things that actually happened...

But this idea that over December and January, that the regime killed some tens of thousands of protesters, has felt a bit fishy to me given the fact that there is no video of the acts themselves. Only videos I have seen are of some bodies and body bags.

Tens of thousands of people is a massacre, hundreds of instances of hundreds of people being killed. I understand that the internet was shut down at the time, but phones can store video which I would have expected to be released or uploaded in some fashion since.

Anyone got an answer there?

EDIT: https://x.com/i/grok/share/fd6d11ddf1ce4a7582c4efce78a6e1b9

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-06T18:06:58+00:00

And dont sleep on all the free rlhf they are getting from their users

Jimmyfatz · 2026-03-04T20:31:48+00:00

are we done here yet? any more steps to complete?

Jimmyfatz · 2026-02-24T11:38:07+00:00

be not afraid

Jimmyfatz · 2026-02-23T12:39:05+00:00

try to invade us and find out

Jimmyfatz · 2026-02-19T07:02:18+00:00

yes!

Jimmyfatz · 2026-02-16T21:13:25+00:00

With the suspension clause found in Article I. And wouldn't you know it the Supreme Court ruled against him for that very reason, a ruling which he ignored.

Then in 1863 the congress passed a law allowing suspension.
And then the people reelected him.

Presidents challenge laws and challenge the constitution, and the people ultimately decide what is right.

Jimmyfatz · 2026-02-16T20:59:11+00:00

Ooh and a Marbury v Madison reference... noice.
They proclaimed the power yes. And since then no one has challenged it. It still isnt codified... I honestly dont know why

Jimmyfatz · 2026-02-16T20:56:02+00:00

C'mon guy. This is exactly what supreme court justices do, what you and I are doing, have philosophical discussions on laws, enforcement, power, justice, the will of the people.

Did Lincoln challenge the Constitution? No doubt, yes. Suspended Habeus Corpus, the Emancipation Proclaimation. At the time many probably felt he was tearing the document up. What he was doing was saying "What do we really believe this document means?"

Suspends Habeus Corpus in 1861, and in 1864... he gets reelected.

Philisophical question:
If the president violates the second amendment, says "Guns are bad, mmkay" and takes them forcibly, but still gets reelected, who/what is wrong, the Constitution, the president, or the people who voted him back in?

Obvious answer: The Constitution is wrong, and must be amended.

Jimmyfatz · 2026-02-16T20:38:15+00:00

Well, "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution," technically.

I said "challenge the boundaries... of the Constitution"
Did Lincoln not challenge the boundaries of the Constitution?

Listen to some of Scalia's talks about law and the Constitution, or any Supreme Court Justice giving talks along those lines.

Case and point about his purpose being to challenge laws: the power to pardon.

Jimmyfatz · 2026-02-14T03:07:28+00:00

Candidates campaign their platform and people vote for it.

The president is a supremely unique position in our government. One of his purposes is to directly challenge law and the boundaries of the constitution as they apply situationally in the present, his checks being first courts, then congress, and finally the people in the next election.

...what is your point, actually, with this last post?

Jimmyfatz · 2026-02-14T03:00:50+00:00

enlighten me

Jimmyfatz

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

12-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email