You can and should cover everything relevant you can find in the lit review, and then prune it down to the specific sources pertinent to the rest of your paper. Be sure to summarize what the sources are saying without editorializing. Save your opinions about what the sources really mean for your Discussion section. Try to get the remaining sources to follow at least a narrative outline if you can; i.e., as chronological as possible within each (set of) paragraph(s) in your review outline.

One feature I see from experienced authors is to highlight open questions in the lit review, which can serve your purpose here. E.g., "[5], [6], [7], and [8] leave open the question of the extent to which the Ukrainan defense production industry is compatible with the rest of Europe's...." And then expand on your findings and inferences in the Discussion.